Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2002; 70(12): 625-629
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35852
Editorial
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Moderne Modelle der Persönlichkeit und ihre empirische Analyse

Current Models of Personality and their Empirical EvaluationE.  M.  Steinmeyer1 , J.  Klosterkötter1
  • 1Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität zu Köln
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 December 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Am Ende der 4. Version des Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals (DSM-IV) der amerikanischen Psychiatriegesellschaft [1], also des derzeit weltweit meist genutzten Diagnosesystems in unserem Fach, findet sich ein bemerkenswerter Ausblick, in dem die Verfasser Zukunftsperspektiven der Diagnoseforschung erörtern und dabei auch deren von Anfang an beibehaltenes kategoriales Einteilungsprinzip selbstkritisch in Zweifel ziehen.

Literatur

  • 1 American Psychiatric Association .Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Author 1994
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte. 7. Aufl. Leipzig: Barth 1903/1904
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 World Health Organisation .10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Chapter V (F): Mental and behavioral disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva 1991
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Schneider K. Klinische Psychopathologie. 5. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme 1950
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Freud S. Charakter und Analerotik. Frankfurt: Fischer 1908
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Alexander F. Der neurotische Charakter. Seine Stellung in der Psychopathologie und in der Literatur.  Int Z Psychoanal. 1928;  14 26-44
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Jung C G. Psychologische Typen. Zürich: Rascher 1921
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Meyer A. An attempt at analysis of the neurotic constitution.  Am J Psychol.. 1903;  14 354-367
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kretschmer E. Körperbau und Charakter. 24. Aufl. Berlin: Springer 1961
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Eysenck H J. The scientific study of personality. London: Routlege Kegan Paul 1952
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Fiske D W. Consistency of factorial structure of personality ratings from different sources.  J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1949;  44 329-344
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Schneider K. Die psychopathischen Persönlichkeiten. 9. Aufl. Leipzig: Thieme 1950
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Akiskal H S, Akiskal K. Cyclothymic, hyperthymic and depressive temperaments as subaffective variants of mood disorders. In: Tasman A, Riba MB (eds). Review of Psychiatry. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press 1992 11: pp 43-62
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Mehl P E. Toward an integrated theory of schizotaxia, schizotypy and schizophrenia.  J Pers Disord. 1990;  4 1-99
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Davis R, Millon T. On the importance of theory on the taxonomy of personality disorders. In: Livesley WJ (ed). The DSM-IV Personality Disorders. New York: Guilford 1995
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Livesley W J, Jackson D N, Schroeder M L. Factorial structure of traits delineating personality disorders in clinical and general population samples.  Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1992;  101 432-440
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Widiger T. Categorical versus dimensional classification: implications from and for research.  J Personal Disord.. 1992;  6 287-300
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Livesley W J, Jackson D N, Schroeder M L. Factorial structure of traits delineating personality disorders in clinical and general population samples.  Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1992;  101 432-440
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Pukrop R, Herpertz S N, Saß H, Steinmeyer E MI. Personality and personality disorders. A facet theoretical analysis of the similarity relationships.  J Personal Disord. 1998;  2 226-246
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Clark L A, Livesley W J, Morey L. Personality disorder and assessment: the chalange of construct validity.  Journal of Personality disorder. 1997;  11 205-231
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Perry C. Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders.  Am J Psychiatry. 1992;  149 1645-1653
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Widiger T, Rogers J H. Prevalence and comorbidity of personality disorders.  Psychiatric Annals. 1989;  19 132-136
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gunderson J G, Zanarini M C, Kisiel C L. Borderline Personality disorder: a review of data on DSM-III-R descriptions.  J Personal Disord. 1991;  5 340-352
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Cloninger C R, Svarkic D M, Przybeck T R. A psychobiological model of temperament and character.  Archives of General Psychiatry. 1993;  50 (12) 975-990
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Herbst J H, Zondermann A B, McCrae R R, Costa P T. Do the dimensions of the Temperament and Character Inventory map a simple genetic architecture? Evidence from molecular genetics and factor analysis. Am J.  Psychiatry. 2000;  157 1275-1280
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Costa P T, Widiger T A. Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association 1994
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Becker P A. Multifacets Circumplex Model of Personality as a Basis for the Description and Therapy of Personality Disorders.  Journal of Personality Disorders. 1998;  23 12-20
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 v Zerssen D. Variants of premorbid personality and personality disorder: A taxonomic model of their relationships.  European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2000;  250 234-248
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Livesley W J. Suggestions for a framework for an empirically based classification of personality disorder.  Can J Psychiatry. 1998;  43 137-147
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Harkness A R. Fundamental topics in the personality disorders: Candidate trait dimensions from lower regions of the hierarchy.  Psychological Assessment. 1994;  4 251-259
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Clark L A, Watson D. Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. In: Pervin LA, John OP (eds). Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford 1999: pp 399-423
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Leonhard K. Akzentuierte Persönlichkeiten. 3. überarbeitete Aufl. Würzburg: WKL Schriftreihe 2000
    Search in Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. phil. E. M. Steinmeyer

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität zu Köln

Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 9

50924 Köln

Email: Eckhard.Steinmeyer@medizin.uni-koeln.de