Download PDF
Semin Hear 2002; 23(4): 309-318
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35879
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Classroom Acoustics and Personal FM Technology in Management of Auditory Processing Disorder

Gail Gegg Rosenberg
  • Vice President, Interactive Solutions Incorporated, Sarasota, Florida
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Acoustical conditions in the classroom, home, and social environments are often barriers to listening and learning for students with auditory processing disorder (APD). The effective management of APD requires careful attention to classroom acoustics and the use of personal frequency modulated (FM) systems as strategies to improve the quality of the listening environment and the student's access to acoustic information. As members of the multidisciplinary team responsible for both auditory assessment and management, audiologists have the responsibility to guide the evaluation of the listening environment and make recommendations for modifications, as well as the selection, fitting, and monitoring of personal FM technologies. Demonstrating efficacy is an essential part of the management process. Audiologists are challenged to contribute to the research base by collecting data to support the use of personal FM systems as an efficacious management strategy.

KEYWORDS

Auditory processing disorder - profiles - personal FM - classroom management

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bellis T. Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Stein R. Application of FM technology to the management of central auditory processing disorders. In: Masters M, Stecker N, Katz J, eds. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Mostly Management Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon 1998: 89-102
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Rosenberg G, Blake-Rahter P, Heavner J. Improving classroom acoustics (ICA): a three-year FM sound field classroom amplification study.  J Ed Audiol . 1999;  7 8-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rosenberg G. FM sound field research identifies benefits for students and teachers.  Ed Audiol Rev . 1998;  15(3) 6-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stach B, Loiselle L, Jerger J, Mintz S, Taylor C. Clinical experience with personal FM assisting listening devices.  Hear J . 1987;  5 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bellis T, Ferre J. Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1999;  10 319-328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Florida Department of Education. Central auditory processing disorders: technical assistance paper. Tallahassee, FL: Author 2001
  • 8 Stecker N. Overview and update of CAPD. In: Masters M, Stecker N, Katz J, eds. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: Mostly Management Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon 1998: 1-14
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hall J, Mueller H. Audiologists Desk Reference, vol. 1.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Bellis T. Subprofiles of central auditory processing disorders.  Ed Audiol Rev . 1999;  16(2) 4-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Smaldino J, Crandell C. Speech perception in the classroom. In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, eds. Classroom Acoustics: Understanding Barriers to Learning The Volta Rev 2001 101: 15-21
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Crandell C, Smaldino J. Room acoustics for listeners with normal-hearing and hearing impairment. In: Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, Roeser R, eds. Audiology: Treatment New York: Thieme 2000: 601-623
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Finitzo-Hieber T, Tillman T. Room acoustic effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal hearing and hearing impaired children.  J Speech Hear Res . 1978;  21 440-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nelson P, Soli S. Acoustical barriers to learning: children at risk in every classroom.  Lang Speech Hear Serv School . 2000;  31 356-361
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Classroom Acoustics Working Group. Improving acoustics in American schools: working draft of standard.  Lang Speech Hear Serv School . 2000;  31 391-393
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Crandell C, Smaldino J. Acoustical modifications for the classroom. In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, eds. Classroom Acoustics: Understanding Barriers to Learning The Volta Rev 2001 101: 33-46
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Sieben G, Gold M, Sieben G, Ermann M. Ten ways to provide a high-quality acoustical environment in schools.  Lang Speech Hear Serv School . 2000;  31 376-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Improving Classroom Acoustics: Inservice Training Manual.  Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Educational Audiology Association. FAQs about classroom acoustics.  Ed Audiol Review . 2000;  17 8-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chermak G D, Musiek F E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 21 ASHA. Guidelines for fitting and monitoring FM systems. ASHA Desk Reference. Rockville, MD: ASHA 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Cockburn J. Listening Environment Profile.  Petaluma, CA: Phonic Ear, Inc. 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Anderson K. Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk (S.I.F.T.E.R.)  Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Fisher L. Fisher's Auditory Problems Checklist.  Tampa, FL: Ed Aud Assn 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Smoski W, Brunt M, Tannahill J. Children's Auditory Performance Scale.  Tampa, FL: Ed Aud Assn 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Johnson C, Von Almen P. The functional listening evaluation. In: Johnson C, Benson P, Seaton J, eds. Educational Audiology Handbook San Diego. CA: Singular 1996: 336-339
    Google Scholar