Phonotaktische Therapie

Zusammenfassung

Worte erhalten ihre Struktur nicht nur von den einzelnen Lauten, sondern auch durch die Organisation der Laute innerhalb des Wortes. Diese Organisation wird die phonotaktische Ebene (also quasi die Bedeutung des Arrangements der Laute) genannt. Kinder mit phonetisch-phonologischen Störungen zeigen häufig neben phonetischen auch phonotaktische Inkompetenzen. Manchmal ist ein Kind in der Lage, eine altersentsprechende Anzahl von Konsonanten und Vokalen zu produzieren, ist aber unfähig, diese in der adäquaten Konfiguration der Muttersprache zu benutzen. So zeigen sich dann Artikulationsfehler bei finalen Konsonanten, Konsonantenclustern, mehrsilbigen Wörtern, usw. In diesen Fällen sollte das Therapieziel weniger nach phonetischen, sondern mehr nach phonotaktischen Gesichtspunkten ausgerichtet sein. Studien haben gezeigt, dass die therapeutische Fokussierung auf eine neue Wort- oder Silbengestalt sehr wohl einen Generalisationseffekt auf andere Lautverbindungen haben kann. Im vorliegenden Artikel werden diese Aspekte näher beleuchtet und spezifische Therapieresultate bzw. Empfehlungen für die verschiedenen phonotaktischen Inkompetenzen gegeben.

Abstract

Words derive their structure not only from the sounds they include but also from the organization of those sounds within the word. This organization is the phonotactic level of the word: roughly, its shape including the sequence of its elements. Often, children with immature or disordered phonologies demonstrate phonotactic as well as phonetic limitations. Sometimes, the child may produce an age-appropriate variety of consonants and vowels but be unable to use them in the configurations required by the language: final consonants, clusters, multisyllabic words, and so forth. In such cases, the most appropriate therapy goals may be phonotactic, rather than phonetic, ones. Studies have shown that clinical focus on a new word or syllable shape may generalize well beyond the specific sound or sounds targeted in that position. These ideas are explored in this article, along with specific therapy results and recommendations for various phonotactic limitations.

Phonotaktik - Silbe - Wort - Behandlung

Phonotactic - syllable - word - treatment

Literatur

• 1 Grunwell P. Clinical Phonology. Rockville, MD; Aspen 1982
• 2 Ingram D. Phonological Disability in Children. 2nd ed San Diego; Singular Publishing Group 1990
• 3 Davis B, Mac Neilage P. The articulatory basis of babbling.  J Speech Hear Res. 1995;  38 1199-1211
• 4 Bleile K M. Manual of Articulation and Phonological Disorders: Infancy through Adulthood. San Diego; Singular 1995
• 5 Bernhardt B. Phonological intervention techniques for syllable and word structure development.  Clin Commun Disord. 1994;  4 54-65
• 6 Bernhardt B, Stoel-Gammon C. Nonlinear phonology: introduction and clinical application.  J Speech Hear Res. 1994;  37 123-143
• 7 Velleman S. Making Phonology Functional: What Do I Do First?. Boston; Butterworth-Heinemann 1998
• 8 Yavas M. Phonology: Development and Disorders. San Diego; Singular 1998
• 9 Chomsky N, Halle M. The Sound Pattern of English. New York; Harper & Row 1968
• 10 Donegan P J, Stampe D. The study of natural phonology. In: Dinnsen DA, ed Current Approaches to Phonological Theory. Bloomington,; IN: Indiana University Press 1979: 126-173
• 11 Demuth K, Fee E J. Minimal words in early phonological development. Brown University and Dalhousie University: MS 1995
• 12 Kehoe M M, Stoel-Gammon C. Development of syllable structure in English-speaking children with particular reference to rhymes.  J Child Lang. 2001;  28 393-432
• 13 Vihman M M, Velleman S L. Phonetics and the origins of phonology. In: Burton-Roberts N, Carr P, Docherty G, eds Conceptual and Empirical Foundations of Phonology. Oxford; Oxford University Press 2000: 305-339
• 14 Berman R A. Natural phonological processes at the one-word stage.  Lingua. 1977;  43 1-21
• 15 Velleman S L. The interaction of phonetics and phonology in developmental verbal dyspraxia: two case studies.  Clin Commun Disord. 1994;  4 67-78
• 16 De Boysson-Bardies B, Vihman M M, Roug-Hellichius L, Durand C, Landberg I, Arao F. Material evidence of infant selection from target language: a cross-linguistic phonetic study. In: Ferguson C, Menn L, Stoel-Gammon C, eds Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, MD; York Press 1992: 369-391
• 17 Stoel-Gammon C. Sounds and words in early language acquisition: the relationship between lexical and phonological development. In: Paul R, ed Exploring the Speech-Language Connection. Baltimore; Brookes 1998: 25-52
• 18 Vihman M M, Hochberg J G. Velars and final consonants in early words. In: Fishman JA, Tabouret-Keller A, Clyne M, et al. eds The Fergusonian Impact. Berlin; Mouton de Gruyter 1986: 37-49
• 19 Edwards M L. Word position effects in the production of fricatives. In: Bernhardt B, Gilbert J, Ingram D, eds UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Vancouver, BC; Cascadilla Press 1996: 149-158
• 20 Weiner F. Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: two case studies.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1981;  46 97-103
• 21 Bernhardt B H, Gilbert J. Applying linguistic theory to speech-language pathology: the case for nonlinear phonology.  Clin Linguist Phonet. 1992;  6 123-145
• 22 MacNeilage P F, Davis B L, Matyear C. Phonetic regression in first words?. Speech Commun 1997 22(special issue): 269-277
• 23 Davis B L, MacNeilage P F, Matyear C. Acquisition of serial complexity in speech production: a comparison of phonetic and phonological approaches to first word production. Phonetica (in press)
• 24 Kirkpatrick J, Stohr P, Kimbrough D. Moving Across Syllables. Tucson, AZ Communication Skill Builders. 1990 (Note: The Test of Syllable Sequencing Skills is packaged with Moving Across Syllables)
• 25 Gerken L. A metrical template account to children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words.  J Child Lang. 1994;  21 565-584
• 26 Kehoe M, Stoel-Gammon C. Truncation patterns in English-speaking children’s word production.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;  40 526-541
• 27 Gerken L, McIntosh B J. The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language.  Dev Psychol. 1993;  29 448-457
• 28 Stoel-Gammon C. Phonological skills of 2-year-olds.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1987;  18 323-329
• 29 Roberts J E, Burchinal M, Footo M M. Phonological process decline from 2;6 to 8 years. J Commun Disord 1990; 23 : 205 - 217; cited by McLeod S, van Doorn J, Reed VA. Normal acquisition of consonant clusters.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2001;  10 99-110
• 30 Greenlee M. Interacting processes in child’s acquisition of stop-liquid clusters.  Pap Rep Child Lang Dev. 1974;  7 85-100
• 31 Olmsted D. Out of the Mouths of Babes. The Hague Mouton; 1971
• 32 Hodson B W, Paden E P. Targeting Intelligible Speech: A Phonological Approach to Remediation. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 1991
• 33 Smith N V. The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 1973
• 34 Gierut J A. Syllable onsets: clusters and adjuncts in acquisition.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;  42 708-726
• 35 Barlow J A. The structure of /s/-sequences: evidence from a disordered system.  J Child Lang. 2001;  28 291-324
• 36 Zimmerman I L, Steiner V G, Pond R E. Preschool Language Scale-3. San Antonio, TX; Communication Skill Builders 1992
• 37 Hodson B. The Assessment of Phonological Processes-Revised. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 1986