Semin Hear 2003; 24(1): 043-062
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37906
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Hearing Aids and Digital Wireless Telephones

David Preves
  • Micro-Tech Hearing Instruments, Plymouth, Minnesota
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 March 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT

A highly audible interfering sound may be created in hearing aid outputs by the pulsatile electromagnetic signals generated by some digital cellular telephones (DCT). At its worst, this undesirable signal totally dominates the audio processing of the hearing aid and makes it unusable. The degree of interference generated is a function of the type of DCT technology, the type or style of hearing aid, and how many precautionary measures have been taken in the hearing aid design to reduce interference. Engineers from telephone companies and hearing aid engineers have worked together with the encouragement of hearing aid consumers and the Federal Communications Commission to reduce this interference problem. As a result, considerable strides have been made, particularly by hearing aid companies, toward improving the immunity of hearing aids to DCT interference. Many of these same engineers have participated in national and international standards committees to develop viable methods for assessing the amount of immunity to DCT interference provided by hearing aids and the emission levels from DCTs. The process of harmonizing these standard assessment techniques is ongoing.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Harkins J. Practical information for audiologists on access to wireless telephones.  J Am Acad Audiol . 2001;  12 290-295
  • 2 Victorian T. Update on digital cellular telephone interference and hearing aid compatibility.  The Hearing Journal . 1998;  51 53-60
  • 3 Machrone B. Portable telephones for everyone.  PC Magazine . 1995;  July 83
  • 4 Slovut G. Cell-phone risk to pacemakers is revised. Minneapolis Star Tribune May 22, . 1997: A9
  • 5 Medtronic Cellular Phones and Pacemakers or Defibrillators.  Minneapolis, MN: Medtronic Pacing Technical Services Bulletin; Feb 1 1996
  • 6 O'Quinn L. California has declared war on GSM wireless.  Communications News . 1996;  July 10
  • 7 Killion M, Chung K, Teder H. Moving towards a Workable Standard.  Elk Grove Village, IL: Etymotic Research; 1996
  • 8 Levitt H, Harkins J, Singer B, Yeung E. Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids.  J Am Acad Audiol . 2001;  12 275-280
  • 9 Interference to hearing aids by the Digital Mobile Telephone System, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) NAL Report No 131. Sydney, Australia: National Acoustics Laboratory.  1995; 
  • 10 Macfarlane I. Magnitudes of the near E-fields close to hand-held GSM digital mobile telephones.  Australian Telecommunications Research . 1994;  28(2)
  • 11 Killion M. Letter to Elsworth Sharpe, FDA; October 31, 1996 . 
  • 12 Lambert E, Frazier T. Comparison of audible interference in hearing aids produced by CDMA and GSM TDMA RF transmission of digital cellular signals; June 8, 1994; Qualcomm Inc.  
  • 13 Killion M. Communication at ANSI C63.19 working group meeting in Dallas, TX October 31, 1996 . 
  • 14 Executive Summary (Phase I Results) Hearing Aid-Wireless Phone Interaction Study, 1996; Center for the Study of Wireless Electromagnetic Compatibility.  Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma; 1996
  • 15 GSM Project Final Report, European Hearing Instrument Manufacturers Association (EHIMA); 1995 . 
  • 16 Joyner K, Wood M, Burwood E, Allison D, Le Strange R. Interference to hearing aids by the new digital mobile telephone system, Global System for Mobile (GSM) Communications Standard, National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia; March 30, 1993 . 
  • 17 Hansen M, Poulsen T. Evaluation of noise in hearing instruments caused by GSM and DECT mobile telephones.  Scandinavian Audiol . 1996;  25 227-232
  • 18 Killion M. Method for reducing audio interference from cellular telephone transmissions. Presented at the Hearing Aid Compatibility and Accessibility to Digital Wireless Telecommunications summit meeting, Washington, DC, January 4, 1996
  • 19 Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association Joint Review Committee Planning Forum Interaction between Wireless Phones and Hearing Aids. CTIA Forum Report; June 21, 1995 . 
  • 20 American National Standards Institute Method of Measurement of Compatibility between Wireless Communications Devices and Hearing Aids C63.19; 2001 . 
  • 21 Killion M. Digital cell phones and hearing aids: the problem is mostly solved.  The Hearing Journal . 2001;  54 10
  • 22 IEC. International Electrotechnical Commission standard 60118-13, Hearing Aids Part 13, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)-Product Standard; 2000 . 
  • 23 Caputa K, Stuchly M, Skopec M, Bassen H, Ruggera P, Kanda M. Evaluation of electromagnetic interference from a cellular telephone with a hearing aid. IEEE Trans.  On Microwave Theory and Techniques . 2000;  48 11:2148-2154
  • 24 Killion M. Digital cellphone progress report. Presented at the Hearing Industry Association Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, February 24, 2000
  • 25 Battat B. Wireless phones-don't mix them up.  Hearing Loss . 1997;  Jan/Feb 24-25
  • 26 Moller P, Balzano Q. Communication at ANSI C63.19 working group meeting October 31, 1996 . 
  • 27 Martin M. Hearing aids and mobile phone interference: the hearing aid industry position with regard to the implementation of American National Standard C63.19; 2001 . 
  • 28 Woodbury D. Communication at an ANSI C63.19 working group meeting, August 29, 2001; Elk Grove Village, IL . 
  • 29 Gendel J. Some digital cell phones can be used with a t-coil.  The Hearing Journal . 2001;  54 64
  • 30 Mitsubishi. Mitsubishi's (Murata) dual chip capacitor & chip ferrite bead for EMI type Pi-filter June 1995 specification. Rolling Meadows, IL: MMC Electronics America Inc. 1995
  • 31 Knowles offers microphones with EMI suppression. Letter from Robert Dranter, Knowles Marketing, Itasca, IL, December 13, 1996 . 
  • 32 Husang K. Electrical hearing aid device with high frequency electromagnetic radiation protection U.S. Patent 6,104,821; 2000 . 
  • 33 Berger S. Hearing aid and cellular telephone compatibility: working toward solutions.  J Amer Acad Audiol . 2001;  12 309-314
  • 34 NORTEL. Electromagnetic compatibility of digital wireless handsets and hearing aids: preliminary diagnostic measurements and conclusions Pres. Feb. 29, 1996. Mississauga, ON, Canada: Northern Telecom Inc. 1996
  • 35 Bowen-Nielsen J, Winberg O. Communication system for users of hearing aids U.S. Patent 6,078,675; 2000 . 
  • 36 McClennon R, Thorpe L. EM interference canceller in an audio amplifier U.S. Patent 6, 137, 888; 2000 . 
  • 37 Killion M, Matzen N. Method and apparatus for reducing audio interference from cellular telephone transmission U.S. Patent 6,009,311; 1999 .