RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37906
Hearing Aids and Digital Wireless Telephones
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
13. März 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT
A highly audible interfering sound may be created in hearing aid outputs by the pulsatile electromagnetic signals generated by some digital cellular telephones (DCT). At its worst, this undesirable signal totally dominates the audio processing of the hearing aid and makes it unusable. The degree of interference generated is a function of the type of DCT technology, the type or style of hearing aid, and how many precautionary measures have been taken in the hearing aid design to reduce interference. Engineers from telephone companies and hearing aid engineers have worked together with the encouragement of hearing aid consumers and the Federal Communications Commission to reduce this interference problem. As a result, considerable strides have been made, particularly by hearing aid companies, toward improving the immunity of hearing aids to DCT interference. Many of these same engineers have participated in national and international standards committees to develop viable methods for assessing the amount of immunity to DCT interference provided by hearing aids and the emission levels from DCTs. The process of harmonizing these standard assessment techniques is ongoing.
KEYWORDS
Interference - immunity - emission - digital - cellular - telephone
REFERENCES
- 1 Harkins J. Practical information for audiologists on access to wireless telephones. J Am Acad Audiol . 2001; 12 290-295
- 2 Victorian T. Update on digital cellular telephone interference and hearing aid compatibility. The Hearing Journal . 1998; 51 53-60
- 3 Machrone B. Portable telephones for everyone. PC Magazine . 1995; July 83
- 4 Slovut G. Cell-phone risk to pacemakers is revised. Minneapolis Star Tribune May 22, . 1997: A9
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 5 Medtronic Cellular Phones and Pacemakers or Defibrillators.
Minneapolis, MN: Medtronic Pacing Technical Services Bulletin; Feb 1 1996
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 6 O'Quinn L. California has declared war on GSM wireless. Communications News . 1996; July 10
- 7 Killion M, Chung K, Teder H. Moving towards a Workable Standard.
Elk Grove Village, IL: Etymotic Research; 1996
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 8 Levitt H, Harkins J, Singer B, Yeung E. Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol . 2001; 12 275-280
- 9
Interference to hearing aids by the Digital Mobile Telephone System, Global System
for Mobile Communications (GSM) NAL Report No 131. Sydney, Australia: National Acoustics
Laboratory.
1995;
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 10 Macfarlane I. Magnitudes of the near E-fields close to hand-held GSM digital mobile telephones. Australian Telecommunications Research . 1994; 28(2)
- 11 Killion M. Letter to Elsworth Sharpe, FDA; October 31, 1996 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 12 Lambert E, Frazier T. Comparison of audible interference in hearing aids produced by CDMA and GSM TDMA RF
transmission of digital cellular signals; June 8, 1994; Qualcomm Inc.
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 13 Killion M. Communication at ANSI C63.19 working group meeting in Dallas, TX October 31, 1996
.
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 14 Executive Summary (Phase I Results) Hearing Aid-Wireless Phone Interaction Study,
1996; Center for the Study of Wireless Electromagnetic Compatibility.
Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma; 1996
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 15 GSM Project Final Report, European Hearing Instrument Manufacturers Association (EHIMA);
1995 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 16 Joyner K, Wood M, Burwood E, Allison D, Le Strange R. Interference to hearing aids by the new digital mobile telephone system, Global System
for Mobile (GSM) Communications Standard, National Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney,
Australia; March 30, 1993 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 17 Hansen M, Poulsen T. Evaluation of noise in hearing instruments caused by GSM and DECT mobile telephones. Scandinavian Audiol . 1996; 25 227-232
- 18 Killion M. Method for reducing audio interference from cellular telephone transmissions. Presented at the Hearing Aid Compatibility and Accessibility to Digital Wireless Telecommunications
summit meeting, Washington, DC, January 4, 1996
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 19 Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association Joint Review Committee Planning
Forum Interaction between Wireless Phones and Hearing Aids. CTIA Forum Report; June
21, 1995 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 20 American National Standards Institute Method of Measurement of Compatibility between
Wireless Communications Devices and Hearing Aids C63.19; 2001 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 21 Killion M. Digital cell phones and hearing aids: the problem is mostly solved. The Hearing Journal . 2001; 54 10
- 22 IEC. International Electrotechnical Commission standard 60118-13, Hearing Aids Part 13,
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)-Product Standard; 2000 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 23 Caputa K, Stuchly M, Skopec M, Bassen H, Ruggera P, Kanda M. Evaluation of electromagnetic interference from a cellular telephone with a hearing aid. IEEE Trans. On Microwave Theory and Techniques . 2000; 48 11:2148-2154
- 24 Killion M. Digital cellphone progress report. Presented at the Hearing Industry Association Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, February
24, 2000
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 25 Battat B. Wireless phones-don't mix them up. Hearing Loss . 1997; Jan/Feb 24-25
- 26 Moller P, Balzano Q. Communication at ANSI C63.19 working group meeting October 31, 1996 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 27 Martin M. Hearing aids and mobile phone interference: the hearing aid industry position with
regard to the implementation of American National Standard C63.19; 2001 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 28 Woodbury D. Communication at an ANSI C63.19 working group meeting, August 29, 2001; Elk Grove
Village, IL .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 29 Gendel J. Some digital cell phones can be used with a t-coil. The Hearing Journal . 2001; 54 64
- 30 Mitsubishi. Mitsubishi's (Murata) dual chip capacitor & chip ferrite bead for EMI type Pi-filter
June 1995 specification. Rolling Meadows, IL: MMC Electronics America Inc. 1995
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 31 Knowles offers microphones with EMI suppression. Letter from Robert Dranter, Knowles
Marketing, Itasca, IL, December 13, 1996 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 32 Husang K. Electrical hearing aid device with high frequency electromagnetic radiation protection
U.S. Patent 6,104,821; 2000 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 33 Berger S. Hearing aid and cellular telephone compatibility: working toward solutions. J Amer Acad Audiol . 2001; 12 309-314
- 34 NORTEL. Electromagnetic compatibility of digital wireless handsets and hearing aids: preliminary
diagnostic measurements and conclusions Pres. Feb. 29, 1996. Mississauga, ON, Canada:
Northern Telecom Inc. 1996
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 35 Bowen-Nielsen J, Winberg O. Communication system for users of hearing aids U.S. Patent 6,078,675; 2000 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 36 McClennon R, Thorpe L. EM interference canceller in an audio amplifier U.S. Patent 6, 137, 888; 2000 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
- 37 Killion M, Matzen N. Method and apparatus for reducing audio interference from cellular telephone transmission
U.S. Patent 6,009,311; 1999 .
Reference Ris Wihthout Link
