Nocturnal Versus Diurnal Pollination Success in Isertia laevis (Rubiaceae): A Sphingophilous Plant Visited by Hummingbirds

Abstract

Isertia laevis (Rubiaceae) possesses flowers with traits typical for the pollination syndrome of sphingophily. Diurnal flower observation showed that nine different hummingbirds (Trochilidae) and one flower piercer (Coerebidae) were frequent visitors. Their activity on the flowers peaked in the morning hours. Very low nectar volumes were found in the morning (8.00 h) in unbagged flowers. Nectar volumes, however, reached their peaks (27 μl) at night (2.00 h) in bagged, as well as in unbagged flowers. At night few individuals of sphingids were observed. Pollination experiments showed that flowers presented to nocturnal pollinators from 18.00 h to 6.00 h had low fruit set (14 %) but high seed set (59 %). Flowers accessible from 6.00 h to 18.00 h for diurnal flower visitors showed high fruit set of 63 % but low seed set of 14 %. This suggests that pollination of individual flowers is less effective during daytime. Regarding relative reproductive success, i.e., efficiency of pollination defined as fruit set x seed set, both diurnal and nocturnal pollinators, however, are equally successful. We conclude that frequently occurring, but not very effective pollinators contribute substantially to seed production, when the expected pollinators are scarce.

Rubiaceae - Sphingidae - Trochilidae - nectar production - pollination effectiveness - pollination syndromes - reproductive system - fruit set - seed set

References

• 01 Andersson,  L., and Ståhl,  B.. (1999) Rubiaceae - Isertieae. Flora of Ecuador (62) 162. Rubiaceae (part 3). Harling, G. and Andersson, L., eds. Council for Nordic Publications in Botany pp. 56-129
• 02 Baker,  H. G.. (1961);  The adaptation of flowering plants to nocturnal and crepuscular pollinators.  The Quarterly Review of Biology. 36 64-73
• 03 Baker,  H. G., and Baker,  I.. (1990);  The predictive value of nectar chemistry to the recognition of pollinator types.  Israel Journal of Botany. 39 157-166
• 04 Beattie,  A. J.. (1972);  The pollination ecology of Viola. 2. Pollen loads of insect-visitors.  Watsonia. 9 13-25
• 05 Bernadello,  L. M.,, Galetto,  L.,, Jaramillo,  J.,, and Grijalba,  E.. (1994);  Floral nectar chemical composition of some species from Reserve Rio Gualjalito, Ecuador.  Biotropica. 26 23-29
• 06 Bertin,  R. I., and Willson,  M. F.. (1980);  On the relative effectiveness of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators of Asclepias. .  Canadian Journal of Botany. 58 1744-1746
• 07 Brown,  J. H., and Kodric-Brown,  A.. (1979);  Convergence, competition and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird-pollinated flowers.  Ecology. 60 1022-1035
• 08 Campbell,  D. R.. (1989);  Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success.  Evolution. 43 318-334
• 09 Campbell,  D. R.,, Waser,  N. M.,, and Price,  M. V.. (1996);  Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. .  Ecology. 77 1463-1472
• 10 Cruden,  R. W.. (1977);  Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants.  Evolution. 31 32-46
• 11 Del Hoyo,  J.,, Elliott,  A.,, and Sargatal,  J., eds.. (1999) Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 5, Barn-owls to Hummingbirds. Barcelona; Lynx Editions
• 12 Dziedzioch,  C.. (2001) Artenzusammensetzung und Ressourcenangebot kolibribesuchter Pflanzen im Bergregenwald Südecuadors. Universität Ulm; Dissertation Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften
• 13 Faegri,  K., and van der Pijl,  L.. (1979) The Principles of Pollination Ecology. New York; Pergamon
• 14 Feinsinger,  P., and Busby,  W. H.. (1987);  Pollen carryover: experimental comparisons between morphs of Palicourea lasiorrachis (Rubiaceae), a distylous, bird-pollinated, tropical treelet.  Oecologia. 73 231-235
• 15 Feinsinger,  P., and Colwell,  R. K.. (1978);  Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds.  American Zoologist. 18 779-795
• 16 Feinsinger,  P.,, Busby,  W. H.,, and Tiebout III,  H. M.. (1988);  Effects of indiscriminate foraging by tropical hummingbird on pollination and plant reproductive success: experiments with two tropical treelets (Rubiaceae).  Oecologia. 76 471-474
• 17 Galen,  C.. (1996);  Rates of floral evolution: adaption to bumblebees in an Alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. .  Evolution. 50 120-125
• 18 Galetto,  L.. (1998);  Estructural floral y composición química del néctar en tres especies de Rubiaceae.  Kurtziana. 26 83-98
• 19 Galetto,  L.,, Bernadello,  G.,, and Sosa,  C. A.. (1998);  The relationship between floral nectar composition and visitors in Lycium (Solanaceae) from Argentina and Chile: What does it reflect?.  Flora. 193 303-314
• 20 Gentry,  A. H.. (1990);  Evolutionary patterns in Neotropical Bignoniaceae.  Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. 55 118-129
• 21 Haber,  W. A., and Frankie,  G. W.. (1982);  Pollination of Luehea (Tiliaceae) in Costa Rican deciduous forest.  Ecology. 63 1740-1750
• 22 Haber,  W. A., and Frankie,  G. W.. (1989);  A tropical hawkmoth community: Costa Rican dry forest Sphingidae.  Biotropica. 21 155-172
• 23 Harder,  L. D., and Barrett,  S. C. H.. (1993);  Pollen removal from tristylous Pontederia cordata: effects of anther position and pollinator specialization.  Ecology. 74 1059-1072
• 24 Herrera,  C. M.. (1987);  Components of pollinator “quality”: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage.  Oikos. 50 79-90
• 25 Herrera,  C. M.. (1988);  Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage.  Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 35 95-125
• 26 Herrera,  C. M.. (1989);  Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the “quantity” component in a plant-pollinator system.  Oecologia. 80 241-248
• 27 Hilty,  S., and Brown,  W.. (1986) A Guide to the Birds of Colombia. Princeton; Princeton University Press
• 28 Kearns,  C. A., and Inouye,  D. W.. (1993) Chapter 3: Flowers. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University Press of Colorado pp. 35-76
• 29 Locatelli,  E., and Machado,  I. C. S.. (1999);  Floral biology of Cereus fernambucensis: a sphingophilous cactus of restinga.  Bradleya. 17 86-94
• 30 Mayfield,  M. M.,, Waser,  N. M.,, and Price,  M. V.. (2001);  Exploring the “most effective pollinator” principle with complex flowers: Bumblebees and Ipomopsis aggregata. .  Annals of Botany. 88 591-596
• 31 Mitchell,  R. J., and Waser,  N. M.. (1992);  Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: Pollination success of single flowers.  Ecology. 73 633-638
• 32 Motten,  A. F.,, Campbell,  D. R.,, Alexander,  D. E.,, and Miller,  H. L.. (1981);  Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. .  Ecology. 62 1278-1287
• 33 Murcia,  C.. (1990);  Effect of floral morphology and temperature on pollen receipt and removal in Ipomoea trichocarpa. .  Ecology. 71 1098-1109
• 34 Murcia,  C., and Feinsinger,  P.. (1996);  Interspecific pollen loss by hummingbirds visiting flower mixtures: effects of floral architecture.  Ecology. 77 550-560
• 35 Ollerton,  J., and Watts,  S.. (2000);  Phenotype space and floral typology: towards an objective assessment of pollination syndromes. Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi. I. Matematisk Naturvidenskapelige Klasse.  Skrifter. 39 149-159
• 36 Olsen,  K. M.. (1997);  Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae).  Oecologia. 109 114-121
• 37 Rio,  C. M. del. (1990);  Sugar preferences in hummingbirds: the influence of subtile chemical difference on food choice.  The Condor. 92 1022-1030
• 38 Rio,  C. M. del,, Baker,  H. G.,, and Baker,  I.. (1992);  Ecological and evolutionary implications of digestive processes: bird preferences and the sugar constituents of floral nectar and fruit pulp.  Exp.. 48 544-551
• 39 Sazima,  M.,, Sazima,  I.,, and Buzato,  S.. (1994);  Nectar by day and by night: Siphocampylus sulfureus (Lobeliaceae) pollinated by hummingbirds and bats.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. 191 237-246
• 40 Schemske,  D. W., and Horvitz,  C. C.. (1984);  Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization.  Science. 225 519-521
• 41 Smith,  C. E.,, Stevens,  J. T.,, Temeles,  E. J.,, Ewald,  P. W.,, Hebert,  R. J.,, and Bonkovsky,  R. L.. (1996);  Effect of floral orifice width and shape on hummingbird-flower interactions.  Oecologia. 106 482-492
• 42 Stiles,  F. G., and Freeman,  C. E.. (1993);  Patterns in floral nectar characteristics of some bird-visited plant species from Costa Rica.  Biotropica. 25 191-205
• 43 Stone,  J. L.. (1996);  Components of pollination effectiveness in Psychotria suerrensis, a tropical distylous shrub.  Oecologia. 107 504-512
• 44 Waser,  N. M.. (1978);  Competition for pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers.  Ecology. 59 934-944
• 45 Waser,  N. M., and Price,  M. V.. (1983) Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J., eds. New York; Van Nostrand Reinhold pp. 341-359
• 46 Waser,  N. M., and Price,  M. V.. (1990);  Pollination efficiency and effectiveness of bumble bees and hummingbirds visiting Delphinium nelsonii. .  Collectanea Botanica (Barcelona). 19 9-20
• 47 Waser,  N. M.,, Chittka,  L.,, Price,  M. V.,, Williams,  N. M., and Ollerton,  J.. (1996);  Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters.  Ecology. 77 1043-1060
• 48 Willmott,  A. P., and Búrquez,  A.. (1996);  The pollination of Merremia palmeri (Convolvulaceae): can hawk moths be trusted?.  American Journal of Botany. 83 1050-1056
• 49 Wilson,  P., and Thomson,  J. D.. (1991);  Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen.  Ecology. 72 1503-1507
• 50 Young,  H. J.. (2002);  Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae).  American Journal of Botany. 89 433-440

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger