References
1 For an excellent compilation
of catalytic, enantioselective processes see: Comprehensive
Asymmetric Catalysis
Jacobsen EN.
Pfaltz A.
Yamamoto H.
Springer;
Heidelberg:
1999.
For reviews see:
2a
Palomo C.
Oiarbide M.
Garcia JM.
Chem.-Eur.
J.
2002,
8:
37
2b
Denmark SE.
Stavenger RA.
Acc.
Chem. Res.
2000,
33:
432
2c
Johnson JS.
Evans DA.
Acc.
Chem. Res.
2000,
33:
325
2d
Carreira EM.
Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis
Vol.
3:
Jacobsen EN.
Pfaltz A.
Yamamoto H.
Springer;
Heidelberg:
1999.
p.998
2e
Gröger H.
Vogel EM.
Shibasaki M.
Chem.-Eur. J.
1998,
4:
1137
2f
Nelson SG.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998,
9:
357
3a
Yoshikawa N.
Yamada YMA.
Das J.
Sasai H.
Shibasaki M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999,
121:
4168
3b
Yamada YMA.
Shibasaki M.
Tetrahedron
Lett.
1998,
39:
5561
4a
List B.
Lerner RA.
Barbas CF.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000,
122:
2395
4b Review: List B.
Synlett
2001,
1675
5
Trost BM.
Ito H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000,
122:
12003
6
Juhl K.
Gathergood N.
Jorgensen KA.
Chem.
Commun.
2000,
2211
7
Nothrup AB.
McMillan DWC.
J. Am.
Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
6798
8
Nelson SG.
Peelen TJ.
Wan Z.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
1999,
121:
9742
9a
Taylor SJ.
Duffey MO.
Morken JP.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
2000,
122:
4528
9b
Zhao C.-X.
Duffey MO.
Taylor SP.
Morken JP.
Org.
Lett.
2001,
3:
1829
10
Yoshida K.
Ogasawara M.
Hayashi T.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
10984
A slightly different approach
was pursued by Feringa, Alexakis, and Krische who investigated catalytic, enantioselective
conjugate additions to enones followed by a diastereoselective aldol
reaction, see:
11a
Feringa BL.
Pineschi M.
Arnold LA.
Imbos R.
de
Vries AHM.
Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl.
1997,
36:
2620 ; Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2733
11b
Alexakis A.
Trevitt GP.
Bernardinelli G.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
2001,
123:
4358
11c
Cauble DF.
Gipson JD.
Krische MJ.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003,
125:
1110
12
Mascarenhas CM.
Miller SP.
White PS.
Morken JP.
Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed.
2001,
40:
601 ; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 621
13
Schneider C.
Hansch M.
Chem. Commun.
2001,
1218
14a
Simpura I.
Nevalainen V.
Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed.
2000,
39:
3422 ; Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3564
14b
Nevalainen V.
Simpura I.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2001,
42:
3905
15 Evans et al. have established
metal-catalyzed, highly anti-diastereoselective
Tishchenko reductions of β-hydroxy ketones, see: Evans DA.
Hoveyda AH.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
1990,
112:
6447
16 For a comprehensive review about
synthesis and various applications of tartaric acid-derived TADDOLs
as chiral ligands and auxiliaries see: Seebach D.
Beck AK.
Heckel A.
Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed.
2001,
40:
92 ; Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 97 and ref. cited therein
17 All new products were fully characterized
by 1H and 13C NMR,
IR, MS and elemental analysis. Representative spectroscopic data: 3a: [α]D
20 = +8.9° (c = 1.0, CHCl3, 47% ee);
IR (film): 3452, 2969, 2936, 2878, 1731, 1272, 1202, 1163, 1072
cm-1; 1H (200 MHz,
CDCl3): δ = 0.94 (d, J = 7.0 Hz,
6 H, i-Pr), 1.19 (d, J = 7.0
Hz, 3 H, CH3) 1.22 (d, J = 7.0 Hz,
6 H, i-Pr), 1.56 (m, 2 H, CH2),
1.81 [m, 1 H, CH(CH3)2], 2.61 [sept, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H, CH(CH3)2],
3.02 (br s, 1 H, OH), 3.58 (m, 1 H, CHOH),
4.88 (m, 1 H, CHOCOR); 13C
(50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.61, 18.87,
19.14, 19.23, 22.91, 32.16, 34.39, 41.61, 63.25, 75.49, 178.6; MS
(200 eV, DCI/NH3): m/z = 422(1) [2M + NH4
+],
237(3) [M + NH3 + NH4
+], 220(100) [M + NH4
+],
202(8) [M + H+];
Calculated for C11H22O3 (202.29):
C 65.31, H 10.96; Found C 65.22, H 11.02; 10b: [α]D
20 = +11.5 (c = 0.85, CHCl3,
57% ee); IR (film): 3518, 2967, 2876, 1714, 1389, 1267,
1204, 1163, 1070, 1011 cm-1; 1H
(200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.89 (s, 9 H, t-Bu), 0.93 (d, J = 7.0
Hz, 6 H, i-Pr), 1.20 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6 H, i-Pr), 1.28-1.72 (m, 2 H, CH2),
1.75-1.95 [m, 1 H, CH(CH3)2],
2.50 (br s, 1 H, OH), 2.61 [sept, J = 7.0
Hz, 1 H, CH(CH3)2],
3.00 (dd, J = 10.5, 2.0 Hz,
1 H, CHOH), 4.95 (ddd, J = 10.5
Hz, 5.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 1 H, CHOCOR); 13C
(50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 17.63, 18.97,
19.20, 19.26, 25.94, 32.37, 33.96, 34.41, 34.42, 74.73, 75.81, 178.4;
MS (200 eV, DCI/NH3): m/z = 279 (1) [M + NH3 + NH4
+],
262 (100) [M + NH4
+].
Calculated for C14H28O3 (244.37):
C 68.81, H 11.55; Found: C 69.08, 11.29.
18a The
diols derived from the aldol-Tishchenko products 3a, 3b, and 10b were
independently synthesized through anti-diastereoselective
(Me4N)BH(OAc)3-reduction of the corresponding
aldol products which were obtained according to the following references: List B.
Lerner RA.
Barbas CF.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000,
122:
2395
18b In addition see: Trost BM.
Silcoff ER.
Ito H.
Org. Lett.
2001,
3:
2497
18c Also see: Ramachandran PV.
Xu W.
Brown HC.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1996,
37:
4911
18d The absolute configuration
of the diol derived from 9b was assigned
based upon the known rotation value, see: Marinetti A.
Genet J.-P.
Jus S.
Blanc D.
Ratovelomanana-Vidal V.
Chem.-Eur.
J.
1999,
5:
1160
18e The absolute configuration
of all other products was assigned in analogy to these experiments
19 The following Zr-BINOLate complexes
were tested in the reaction of 1a and 2a under otherwise identical reaction conditions:
Zr(t-BuO)4/(R)-BINOL: 31% yield (28% ee); Zr(t-BuO)4/(R)-6,6′-Br2-BINOL:
35% yield (25% ee); Zr(t-BuO)4/(R)-3,3′-Br2-BINOL:
62% yield (0% ee); Zr(t-BuO)4/(R)-3,3′-Ph2-BINOL:
89% yield (28% ee).
20 Prepared by the l-proline-catalyzed
aldol addition of acetone and isobutyraldehyde according to ref.
[4]
21 For an excellent review about
nonlinear effects see: Girard C.
Kagan HB.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1998,
37:
2922 ; Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3089