A Neurobehavioral Approach to Dysprosody

ABSTRACT

Much of the recent emphasis on prosody (the melody and rhythm of speech) and its disorders (dysprosody) has been on cognitive-affective functions attributed to cortical areas of the right cerebral hemisphere, with little further behavioral or neuroanatomical specification. This focus is inappropriately narrow both from the perspectives of neuropathogenesis and neurobehavioral phenomenology, and it is based on a limited view of prosody. Current models of brain organization for prosody propose lateralized representation based on functional (affective vs. linguistic) or featural (timing vs. pitch) properties of prosodic material. However, a role for subcortical structures in prosody is being increasingly described, and prosodic functions are now known to span a broad range in communication. In this article we describe normal prosody and present an overview of neurobehavioral disorders associated with acquired adult dysprosody. From these considerations we propose a neurobehavior-based approach to a more effective study of prosodic disturbance, and eventually, to better insight into normal prosody.

KEYWORDS

Prosody - basal ganglia - dysprosody - speech - affect

REFERENCES

• 1 Crystal D. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1969
• 2 Banse R, Scherer K R. Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression.  J Pers Soc Psychol . 1996;  70 614-636
• 3 Kreiman J, Vanlancker-Sidtis D, Gerratt B. Perception of voice quality. In: Pisoni D, Remez R, eds. Handbook of Speech Perception (in press)
• 4 Laver J. The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1980
• 5 Cutler A, Dahan D, van Donselaar W. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review.  Lang Speech . 1997;  40 141-201
• 6 Kreiman J. Listening to voices: theory and practice in voice perception. In: Johnson K, Mullenix JW, eds. Talker Variability in Speech Processing New York: Academic Press 1996: 85-108
• 7 Van Lancker D, Kreiman J, Wickens T. Familiar voice recognition: parameters and patterns. Part II: Recognition of rate-altered voices.  J Phonetics . 1985;  13 39-52
• 8 Scherer K R. Personality markers in speech. In: Giles H, ed. Social Markers in Speech Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1979: 147-201
• 9 Geiselman R E, Crawley J M. Incidental processing of speaker characteristics: voice as connotative information.  J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav . 1983;  22 15-23
• 10 Louth S M, Williamson S, Alpert M, Pouget E R, Hare R D. Acoustic distinctions in the speech of male psychopaths.  J Psycholinguist Res . 1998;  27 375-384
• 11 Alpert M. Encoding of feelings in voice. In: Clayton PJ, Barrett JE, eds. Treatment of Depressions: Old Controversies and New Approaches New York: Raven Press 1982: 217-228
• 12 Vanlancker-Sidtis D. Auditory recognition of idioms by first and second speakers of English.  Appl Psycholinguist . 2003;  24 45-57
• 13 Van Lancker D. Rags to riches: our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere.  Brain Lang . 1997;  57 1-11
• 14 Breitenstein C, Daum I, Ackermann H. Emotional processing following cortical and subcortical brain damage: contribution of fronto-striatal circuitry.  Behav Neurol . 1998;  11 29-42
• 15 Kent R D, Rosenbek J. Prosodic disturbance and neurologic lesion.  Brain Lang . 1982;  15 259-291
• 16 Ross E D. The aprosodias: functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere.  Arch Neurol . 1981;  38 561-569
• 17 Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1972
• 18 Monrad-Krohn G H. Dysprosody or altered "melody of speech." Brain .  1947;  70 405-415
• 19 Van Lancker D, Breitenstein C. Emotional dysprosody and similar dysfunctions. In: Bougousslavsky J, Cummings JL, eds. Disorders of Behavior and Mood in Focal Brain Lesions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2000: 326-368
• 20 Van Lancker D, Sidtis J J. The identification of affective-prosodic stimuli by left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects: all errors are not created equal.  J Speech Hear Res   1992;  35 963-970
• 21 Ross E D, Anderson B, Morgan-Fisher A. Crossed aprosodia in strongly dextral patients.  Arch Neurol . 1989;  46 206-209
• 22 Bowers D, Coslett H B, Bauer R M, Speedie L J, Heilman K M. Comprehension of emotional prosody following unilateral hemisphere lesions: processing defect versus distraction defect.  Neuropsychologia . 1987;  25 317-328
• 23 Tompkins C A. Automatic and effortful processing of emotional intonation after right or left hemisphere brain damage.  J Speech Hear Res . 1991;  34 820-830
• 24 Cancelliere A, Kertesz A. Lesion localization in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension.  Brain Cogn . 1990;  13 133-147
• 25 Karow C M, Marquardt T P, Marshall R C. Affective processing in left and right hemisphere brain-damaged subjects with and without subcortical involvement.  Aphasiology . 2001;  15 715-729
• 26 Bhatia K P, Marsden C D. The behavioural and motor consequences of focal lesions of the basal ganglia in man.  Brain . 1994;  117 859-876
• 27 Tranel D. Neuropsychological correlates of cortical and subcortical damage. In: Yudofsky SC, Hales RE, eds. Textbook of Neuropsychiatry Volume II. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press 1992: 57-88
• 28 Caplan L R, Schmahmann J D, Kase C S. Caudate infarcts.  Arch Neurol . 1990;  47133-47143
• 29 Van Lancker D, Pachana N A, Cummings J L, Sidtis J J, Erickson C. Dysprosodic speech following basal ganglia stroke: role of fronto-subcortical circuits.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc . 1996;  2 S5
• 30 Masterman D L, Cummings J L. Frontal-subcortical circuits: the anatomic basis of executive, social, and motivated behaviors.  J Psychopharmacol . 1997;  11 107-114
• 31 Lieberman P, Michaels S B. Some aspects of fundamental frequency and envelope amplitude as related to emotional content of speech.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1962;  34 922-927
• 32 Robinson G M, Solomon D J. Rhythm is processed by the speech hemisphere.  J Exp Psychol . 1974;  102 508-511
• 33 Pell M D. The temporal organization of affective and non-affective prosody in patients with right-hemisphere infarcts.  Cortex . 1999;  35 455-477
• 34 Breitenstein C, Van Lancker D, Daum I, Waters C. Impaired perception of vocal emotions in Parkinson's disease: influence of speech time processing and executive functioning.  Brain Cogn . 2001;  45 277-314
• 35 Sidtis J J, Volpe B T. Selective loss of complex-pitch or speech discrimination after unilateral cerebral lesion.  Brain Lang . 1988;  34 235-245
• 36 Zatorre R J. Pitch perception of complex tones and human temporal lobe function.  J Acoust Soc Am . 1988;  84 566-572
• 37 Sidtis J J, Feldmann E. Transient ischemic attacks presenting with a loss of pitch perception.  Cortex . 1990;  26 469-471
• 38 Sidtis J J. Music, pitch perception, and the mechanisms of cortical hearing. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience New York: Plenum Press 1984: 91-114
• 39 Van Lancker D. Cerebral lateralization of pitch cues in the linguistic signal.  Int J Hum Commun . 1980;  13 201-227
• 40 Gordon H. Hemispheric asymmetries for the perception of musical chords.  Cortex . 1970;  6 387-398
• 41 Van Lancker D, Fromkin V. Hemispheric specialization for pitch and "tone": evidence from Thai.  J Phonetics . 1973;  1 101-109
• 42 Ryalls J, Reinvang I. Functional lateralization of linguistic tones: acoustic evidence from Norwegian.  Lang Speech . 1986;  29 389-398
• 43 Van Lancker D, Fromkin V A. Cerebral dominance for pitch contrasts in tone language speakers and in musically untrained and trained English speakers.  J Phonetics . 1978;  6 19-23
• 44 Blumstein S, Cooper W. Hemispheric processing of intonation contours.  Cortex . 1974;  10 146-158
• 45 Ouellette G P, Baum S R. Acoustic analysis of prosodic cues in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients.  Aphasiology . 1993;  8 257-283
• 46 Bryden M, Ley R. Right-hemisphere involvement in the perception and expression of emotion in normal humans. In: Heilman K, Satz P, eds. Neuropsychology of Human Emotion New York: Guilford Press 1983: 6-44
• 47 Milner B. Complementary functional specialization of the human cerebral hemispheres. In: Levi-Montalcini R, ed. Nerve Cells, Transmitters and Behavior Rome: Pontifica Academia Scientarium; 1980
• 48 Gandour J, Wong D, Van Lancker D, Hutchens G. A PET investigation of speech prosody in tone languages.  Brain Lang . 1997;  12 207-222
• 49 Baum S R, Pell M D. The neural bases of prosody: insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging.  Aphasiology . 1999;  13 581-608
• 50 Baum S R, Pell M D. Production of affective and linguistic prosody by brain-damaged patients.  Aphasiology . 1997;  11 177-198
• 51 Myers P. Right Hemisphere Damage. San Diego, CA: Singular; 1999
• 52 Borod J C. Cerebral mechanisms underlying facial, prosodic, and lexical emotional expression: a review of neuropsychological studies and methodological issues.  Neuropsychology . 1993;  7 445-463
• 53 Bowers D, Bauer R M, Heilman K M. The nonverbal affect lexicon: theoretical perspectives from neurological studies of affect perception.  Neuropsychology . 1993;  7 433-444
• 54 Borod J C, Rorie K D, Haywood C S. et al . Hemispheric specialization for discourse reports of emotional experiences: relationships to demographic, neurological, and perceptual variables.  Neuropsychologia . 1996;  34 351-359
• 55 Cicone M, Wapner W, Gardner H. Sensitivity to emotional expressions and situations in organic patients.  Cortex . 1980;  16 145-158
• 56 Cimino C, Verfaellie M, Bowers D, Heilman K. Autobiographical memory: influence of right hemisphere damage on emotionality and specificity.  Brain Lang . 1991;  15 106-118
• 57 Wechsler A. The effect of organic brain disease on recall of emotionally charged versus neutral narrative texts.  Neurology . 1973;  23 130-135
• 58 Heilman K M. The neurobiology of emotional experience.  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci . 1997;  9 439-448
• 59 Van Lancker D. Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere.  Brain Cogn . 1991;  17 64-92
• 60 Van Lancker D, Canter G J. Impairment of voice and face recognition in patients with hemispheric damage.  Brain Cogn . 1982;  1 185-195
• 61 Van Lancker D, Kreiman J. Unfamiliar voice discrimination and familiar voice recognition are independent and unordered abilities.  Neuropsychologia . 1987;  25 829-834
• 62 Pell M D. Recognition of prosody following unilateral brain lesion: influence of functional and structural attributes of prosodic contours.  Neuropsychologia . 1998;  36 701-715
• 63 De Bleser R, Poeck K. Analysis of prosody in the spontaneous speech of patients with CV-recurring utterances.  Cortex . 1985;  21 405-415
• 64 Shapiro B E, Danly M. The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts.  Brain Lang . 1985;  25 19-36
• 65 Paul L K, Van Lancker D, Schieffer B, Dietrich R, Brown W S. Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: nonliteral language and affective prosody.  Brain Lang (in press).
• 66 Stringer A Y. Treatment of motor aprosodia with pitch biofeedback and expression modeling.  Brain Inj . 1996;  10 583-590