Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2003; 19(1): 019-028
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39128
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Nasal Reconstruction: Aesthetic and Functional Considerations for Alar Defects

Davinder J. Singh, Scott P. Bartlett
  • Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 May 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The nose is the most common site for cutaneous malignancy, and nasal defects requiring reconstruction frequently result from tumor resection. These defects present both a functional and an aesthetic challenge to the surgeon. The ala is a unique structure that plays a key role in the airway as well as in the harmony of nasal geometry. Because it is a paired structure, the restoration of the premorbid aesthetic and anatomic state of the ala is crucial in achieving an optimal result. This article focuses on alar reconstruction, with discussion of the anatomy and the aesthetic and functional considerations that lead to successful restoration of the ala. An algorithm outlining options for nasal defects involving the ala is be presented.

KEYWORDS

Alar defects - nasal reconstruction - nasal subunits

REFERENCES

  • 1 Burget G C, Menick F J. Aesthetic Reconstruction of the Nose. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1994
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Mohs F E. Chemosurgery in Cancer, Gangrene, and Infections. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1956
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Burget G C, Menick F J. Subunit principle in nasal reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1985;  76 239
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Oneal R, Beil R J, Schlesinger J. Surgical anatomy of the nose.  Clin Plast Surg . 1996;  23 195
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Baker S R, Johnson T M, Nelson B R. The importance of maintaining the alar-facial sulcus in nasal reconstruction.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1995;  121(6) 617
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Burget G C, Menick F J. Nasal support and lining. The marriage of beauty and blood supply.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1989;  86 189
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hoasjoe D K, Strucker F J, Aarstad R F. Aesthetic and anatomic considerations for nasal reconstruction.  Facial Plast Surg . 1994;  10(4) 317
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Drisco B P, Baker S R. Reconstruction of nasal alar defects.  Arch Facial Plast Surg . 2001;  3 91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Menick F J. Discussion: a 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-staged forehead flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2002;  109 1839
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Zitelli J A. The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction.  Arch Dermatol . 1898; 
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Rieger R A. A local flap for repair of the nasal tip.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1967;  40 147
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 McLauglin C R. Composite ear grafts and their blood supply.  Br J Plast Surg . 1975;  7 274
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rees T D, Wood-Smith D, Converse J P, Guy C L. Composite grafts. In: Transactions of the Third Congress on Plastic Reconstructive Surgery Washington, DC: Excerpta Medica Foundation; 1963
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Rohrich R J, Conrad M H. The superiorly based nasolabial flap for simultaneous alar and cheek reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2001;  108 1727
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar