Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of ratings
of perceived exertion (RPE) and estimation of time limit (ETL) scales, and
heart rate in physical education students during standardised and replicated
progressive and constant load exercises till exhaustion realised on a track.
Three groups of ten physical education students who present the same
anthropometrical characteristics performed an incremental exercise to determine
their maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) on an indoor track. Thereafter, group 1
performed an identical incremental exercise whereas groups 2 and 3 performed
two identical exercises to exhaustion: a constant load exercise up to
exhaustion at 90 and 100 % MAV, respectively, to determine the
time to exhaustion at each intensity (tlim 90 and tlim 100). The results of
this study were that MAV, tlim 90 and tlim 100 were not significantly different
between the two trials. Moreover, the individual Pearson correlation
coefficients between test and retests were very high (0.94 to 1). The slope and
y intercept values of the relationships between test and retest perceived
exertion ratings were not significantly different from the identity line.
Moreover, test-retest differences in HR values fell within the
95 % LoA analysis. Consequently, HR values, RPE and ETL scales
are reliable during standardised and replicated progressive and constant load
exercises till exhaustion performed on a track with physical education
students.
Key words
Rating scale of perceived exertion (RPE) - rating scale of estimated time limit (ETL) - heart rate - limits of agreement analysis - Pearson correlation coefficient - progressive and constant load exercise
References
1 American College of Sports Medicine .The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for
developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy
adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990 22: 265-274
2 American College of Sports Medicine .The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for
developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy
adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998 30: 975-991
3
Atkinson G, Nevill M.
Statistical methods for assessing measurement error
(reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.
Sports Med.
1998;
26
217-238
4
Billat V, Fléchet B, Petit B, Muriaux G, Koralsztein J P.
Interval training at V˙O2 max: effects on
aerobic performance and overtraining markers.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1999;
31
156-163
5
Billat V, Slawinski J, Bocquet V, Demarle A, Laffite L, Chassaing P, Koralsztein J P.
Intermittent runs at the velocity associated with maximal
oxygen uptake unables subjects to remain at maximal oxygen uptake for a longer
time than intense but submaximal runs.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
2000;
81
188-196
6
Bishop D.
Reliability of a 1-h endurance performance tests in trained
female cyclists.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1997;
29
554-559
7
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two
methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
8
307-310
8
Borg G V.
Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.
Scand J Rehabil Med.
1970;
2
92-98
9
Borg G V.
Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1982;
14
377-381
10
Borg G V.
Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales.
Champaign: Human Kinetics.
1998;
31-34
11 Borg G V, Noble B. Perceived exertion. In: Wilmore JH (ed). Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews New York; Academic Press 1974: 131-153
12 British Standards Institution .Precision of test methods I. Guide for the determination and
reproducibility for a standard test method. BS5497: Pt 1. London; BSI 1979
13
Demarle A P, Slawinski J J, Laffite L P, Bocquet V G, Koralsztein J P, Billat V.
Decrease of O2 deficit is potential factor in
increased time to exhaustion after specific endurance training.
J Appl Physiol.
2001;
90
947-953
14
Ekblom B, Goldbarg A N.
The influence of physical training and others factors on the
subjective rating of perceived exertion.
Acta Physiol Scand.
1971;
83
399-406
15
Eston R G, Davies B L, Williams J G.
Use of perceived effort ratings to control exercise intensity
in young healthy adults.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
1987;
56
222-224
16
Eston R G, Williams J G.
Reliability of ratings of perceived effort for regulation of
exercise intensity.
Br J Sports Med.
1988;
22
153-154
17
Garcin M, Vautier J F, Vandewalle H, Wolff M, Monod H.
Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during cycling exercises
at constant power output.
Ergonomics.
1998;
41
1500-1509
18
Garcin M, Vandewalle H, Monod H.
A new rating scale of perceived exertion based on subjective
estimation of exhaustion time: a preliminary study.
Int J Sports Med.
1999;
20
40-43
19 Glantz S A. Primer of bio-statistics (4th ed.). New York; Mac Graw Hill 1997: 266-271
20
Grant S, Mac M illan, Newell J, Wood L, Keatley S, Simpson D, Leslie K, Fairlie-Clark S.
Reproducibility of the blood lactate threshold, 4
mmol.l-1 marker, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion during
incremental treadmill exercise in humans.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
2002;
87
159-166
21 Hays W L. Statistics (5th ed.) Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers 1994
22
Lamb K L, Eston R G, Corns D.
Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during
progressive treadmill exercise.
Br J Sports Med.
1999;
33
336-339
23
Marriott H E, Lamb K L.
The use of ratings of perceived exertion for regulating
exercise levels in rowing ergometry.
Eur J Appl Physiol.
1996;
72
267-271
24 Pandolf K B. Advances in the study and application of perceived
exertion. In: Terjung RL (ed). Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews Philadelphia; Franklin Institute 1983: 118-158
25 Pollock M L, Jackson A S, Foster C. The use of the perception scale for exercise
prescription. In: Borg G, Ottoson D (eds). The Perception of Exertion in
Physical Work London; Wennergren Center Int Symp Series, Mac Millan
Press 1986: 161-176
26
Robertson R J.
Central signals of perceived exertion during dynamic
exercise.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1982;
14
390-396
27
Shephard R J, Vandewalle H, Gil V, Bouhlel E, Monod H.
Respiratory, muscular and overall perceptions of effort: the
influence of hypoxia and muscle mass.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1992;
24
556-567
28
Skinner J S, Hustler R, Bergsteinova V, Buskirk E R.
The validity and reliability of a rating scale of perceived
exertion.
Med Sci Sports.
1973;
5
94-96
29
Stamford B A.
Validity and reliability of subjective ratings of perceived
exertion during work.
Ergonomics.
1976;
19
53-60
30
Ueda T, Kurokawa T.
Relationships between perceived exertion and physiological
variables during swimming.
Int J Sports Med.
1995;
16
385-389
31 Vautier J F. Puissance critique, indice d’endurance du travail
dynamique. Thèse de Biomécanique et Physiologie du Mouvement, de
l’Université Paris XI,. 1994
32
Walker C AH, Lamb K L, Marriott H E.
The validity of using ratings of perceived exertion to
estiated and regulate exercise intensity during stepping ergometry.
J Sports Sci.
1996;
14
102-103
33
Wenos D L, Wallace J P, Surburg P R, Morris H H.
Reliability and comparison of RPE during variable and
constant exercise protocols performed by older women.
Int J Sports Med.
1996;
17
193-198
34
Whaley M H, Forsyth G.
The value of traditional intensity feedback for self
regulation of initial exercise training.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil.
1990;
10
98-106
M. Garcin
Laboratoire d’Etudes de la Motricité Humaine ·
Faculté des Sciences du Sport et de l’Education Physique
Université de Lille 2 · 9 rue de
l’Université · 59790 Ronchin · France ·
Phone: +33 (320) 887365
Email: mgarcin@mailsc.univ-lille2.fr