Zusammenfassung
Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt die Empfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neutrogastroenterologie und Motilität und der Arbeitsgruppe für gastrointestinale Funktionsstörungen und Funktionsdiagnostik der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie zur 24-Stunden-Ösophagus-pH-Metrie wieder. Dargestellt werden die Indikationen für die Untersuchung, ihre praktische Durchführung, die Analyse und Bewertung der gewonnenen Daten sowie die den Empfehlungen zugrunde liegende wissenschaftliche Literatur.
Abstract
This article presents the recommendations for 24-hour oesophageal pH-metry of the German Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility and the Study Group for Gastrointestinal Functional Disorders and Function Diagnostics of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Indications for the examination, the procedures to be followed, the analysis of the obtained data and the conclusions to be drawn are delineated. The literature on which the recommendations are based is reviewed.
Schlüsselwörter
pH-Metrie - Indikationen - praktische Durchführung - Auswertung
Key words
pH metry - indications - practical aspects - interpretation
Literatur
1
Spencer J.
Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Br J Surg.
1969;
56
9-12
2
DeMeester T R, Johnson L F, Joseph G J. et al .
Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease.
Ann Surg.
1976;
184
459-470
3
Johnson L F, DeMeester T R.
Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1974;
62
325-332
4
DeVault K R, Castell D O.
Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
1434-1442
5
Kahrilas P J, Quigley E MM.
American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Guidelines on the use of esophageal pH recording.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
110
1981-1996
6
Demedts I, Tack J, Sifrim D. et al .
Gastroesophageal reflux disease refractory to proton pump inhibitors: acid, bile reflux and both?.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
116
A326
7
Fass R, Mackel C, Sampliner R E.
24-hour pH monitoring in symptomatic patients without erosive esophagitis who did not respond to antireflux treatment.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1994;
19
97-99
8
Katzka D A, Paoletti V, Leite L. et al .
Prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: testing while on therapy identifies the need for more aggressive anti-reflux therapy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
2110-2113
9
Lord R VN, Kaminski A, Öberg S. et al .
Absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a majority of patients taking acid suppression medications after Nissen fundoplication.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2002;
6
3-10
10 Scarpignato C, Galmiche J P. (Hrsg) .Functional investigation in esophageal disease. Basel; Karger 1994
11
Tytgat G NJ, Bennett J R, Dent J. et al .
Oesophageal pH monitoring - normal and abnormal.
Gastroenterology International.
1989;
2
141-149
12
Achem S R.
Endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am.
1999;
28
893-904
13
Shi G, Bruley d es Varannes S, Scarpignato C. et al .
Reflux related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal exposure to acid.
Gut.
1995;
37
457-464
14
Janssens J P, Vantrappen G.
Irritable esophagus.
Am J Med.
1992;
92 (Suppl. 5A)
27-32
15
Davies H A.
Anginal pain of esophageal origin: clinical presentation, prevalence and prognosis.
Am J Med.
1992;
92(Suppl. 5A)
5S-10S
16
DeMeester T R, O’Sullivan G C, Bermudez G. et al .
Esophageal function in patients with angina-type chest pain and normal coronary angiograms.
Ann Surg.
1982;
196
488-498
17
Fennerty M B.
Extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am.
1999;
28
861-873
18
Katz P O, Castell D O.
Approach to the patient with unexplained chest pain.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95 (Suppl)
4-8
19
Lam H GT, Dekker W, Kann G. et al .
Acute noncardiac chest pain in a coronary care unit. Evaluation by 24-hour pressure and pH recording of the esophagus.
Gastroenterology.
1992;
102
453-460
20
Lux G, Orth K H, Boskurt T.
Nicht-kardialer Thoraxschmerz - eine Erkrankung der Speiseröhre?.
Dtsch Med Wschr.
1995;
120
1748-1755
21
Richter J E.
Overview of diagnostic testing for chest pain of unknown origin.
Am J Med.
1992;
92 (Suppl. 5A)
41-45
22
Singh S, Richter J E, Hewson E G. et al .
The contribution of gastroesophageal reflux to chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease.
Ann Intern Med.
1992;
117
824-830
23
Smout A JPM, Lam H GTH, Breumelhof R.
Ambulatory esophageal monitoring in noncardiac chest pain.
Am J Med.
1992;
92 (Suppl. 5A)
74-83
24
Stein H J, DeMeester T R.
Therapy of noncardiac chest pain: is there a role for surgery?.
Am J Med.
1992;
92 (Suppl. 5A)
122-128
25
Ward B W, Wu W C, Richter J E. et al .
Long-term follow-up of symptomatic status of patients with noncardiac chest pain: is diagnosis of esophageal etiology helpful?.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1987;
82
215-218
26
Garcia-Pulido J, Patel P H, Hunter W C. et al .
Esophageal contribution to chest pain in patients with coronary artery disease.
Chest.
1990;
98
806-810
27 Midell A I, Evander A, DeMeester T R. et al .A study of the interrelationship between esophageal disease and coronary artery disease as the cause of chest pain. Siewert JR, Hölscher AH Diseases of the esophagus Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 1987: 1092-1102
28
Davies H A, Page Z, Rush E M. et al .
Oesophageal stimulation lowers exertional angina threshold.
Lancet.
1985;
1
1011-1014
29
Achem S R, Kolts B E.
Current medical therapy for esophageal motility disorders.
Am J Med.
1992;
92 (Suppl.5A)
98-105
30
Achem S R, Kolts B E, MacMath T. et al .
Effects of omeprazole versus placebo in treatment of noncardiac chest pain and gastroesophageal reflux.
Dig Dis Sci.
1997;
42
2138-2145
31
Ormseth E J, Wong R KH.
Reflux laryngitis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
2812-2817
32
El-Serag H B, Sonnenberg A.
Comorbid occurrence of laryngeal or pulmonary disease with esophagitis in United States military veterans.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
113
755-760
33
Hanson D G, Jiang J J.
Diagnosis and management of chronic laryngitis associated reflux.
AmMed.
2000;
108 (Suppl. 4A)
112-119
34
Wong R KH, Hanson D G, Waring P J. et al .
ENT manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95 (Suppl)
S15-S22
35
Ing A J.
Cough and gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Med.
1997;
103 (Suppl. 5A)
91-96
36
Irwin R S, Madison J M.
Anatomical diagnostic protocol in evaluating chronic cough with specific reference to gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Med.
2000;
108 (Suppl. 4A)
126-130
37
Irwin R S, Richter J E.
Gastroesophageal reflux and chronic cough.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95 (Suppl)
S9-14
38
Irwin R S, Zawacki J K.
Accurately diagnosing and successfully treating chronic cough due to gastroesophageal reflux disease can be difficult.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
3095-3098
39
Ours T M, Kavuru M S, Schilz R J. et al .
A prospective evaluation of esophageal testing and a double-blind, randomized study of omeprazole in a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for chronic cough.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
3131-3138
40
Farup P G, Hovde O, Breder O.
Are frequent short gastro-oesophageal reflux episodes the cause of symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia responding to treatment with ranitidine?.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1995;
30
829-832
41
Klauser A G, Voderholzer W A, Knesewitsch P A. et al .
What is behind dyspepsia?.
Dig Dis Sci.
1993;
38
147-154
42
Pehl C, Wendl B, Greiner I. et al .
Abnormal oesophageal pH-monitoring in patients with functional thoracic and abdominal disorders.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol.
1995;
19
367-372
43
Small P K, Loudon M A, Waldron B. et al .
Importance of reflux symptoms in functional dyspepsia.
Gut.
1995;
36
189-192
44
Lazarchik D A, Filler S J.
Dental erosion: predominant oral lesion in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95 (Suppl)
S33-38
45
Lazarchik D A, Filler S J.
Effects of gastroesophageal reflux on the oral cavity.
Am J Med.
1997;
103 (Suppl. 5A)
107-113
46
Schroeder P L, Filler S J, Ramirez B. et al .
Dental erosion and acid reflux disease.
Ann Intern Med.
1995;
122
809-815
47
Field S K, Gelfand G AJ, McFadden S D.
The effects of antireflux surgery on asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux.
Chest.
1999;
116
766-774
48
Field S K, Sutherland L R.
Does medical antireflux therapy improve asthma in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux?.
Chest.
1998;
114
275-283
49
Field S K, Underwood M, Brant R. et al .
Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in asthma.
Chest.
1996;
109
316-322
50
Field S K.
A critical review of the studies of the effects of simulated or real gastroesophageal reflux on pulmonary function in asthmatic adults.
Chest.
1999;
115
848-886
51
Harding S M, Sontag S J.
Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95 (Suppl)
S23-32
52
Richter J E.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma: the two are directly related.
Am J Med.
2000;
108 (Suppl. 4A)
153-158
53
Sontag S J.
Gastroesophageal reflux and asthma.
Am J Med.
1997;
103 (Suppl. 5A)
84-90S
54
Champion G, Richter J E, Vaezi M F. et al .
Duodenogastroesophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett’s esophagus.
Gastroenterology.
1994;
107
747-754
55
Vaezi M F, Richter J E.
Role of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
111
1192-1199
56
Johnson D A, Winters C, Spurling T J. et al .
Esophageal acid sensitivity in Barrett’s esophagus.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1987;
9
23-27
57
Katzka D A, Castell D O.
Successful elimination of reflux symptoms does not ensure adequate control of acid reflux in Barrett’s esophagus.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1994;
89
989-991
58
Ortiz A, de Martinez H aro LF, Parrilla P. et al .
24-h pH monitoring is necessary to assess acid reflux suppression in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus undergoing treatment with proton pump inhibitors.
Br J Surg.
1999;
86
1472-1474
59
Ouatu-Lascar R, Fitzgerald R C, Triadafilopoulos G.
Differention and proliferation in Barrett’s esophagus and the effects of acid suppression.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
117
327-335
60
Ouatu-Lascar R, Triadafilopoulos G.
Complete elimination of reflux symptoms does not guarantee normalization of intraesophageal acid reflux in patients with Barrett’s esophagus.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1998;
93
711-716
61
Peters F TM, Ganesh S, Kuipers E J. et al .
Endoscopic regression of Barrett’s oesophagus during omeprazole treatment: a randomised double blind study.
Gut.
1999;
45
489-494
62
Fitzgerald R C, Omary M B, Triadafilopoulos G.
Dynamic effects of acid on Barrett’s esophagus: an ex vivo proliferation and differentiation model.
J Clin Invest.
1996;
98
2120-2128
63
Peters F T, Ganesh S, Kuipers E J. et al .
Effect of elimination of acid reflux on epithelial cell proliferative activity of Barrett esophagus.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2000;
35
1238-1244
64
Srinivasan R, Katz P O, Ramkrishnan A. et al .
Maximal acid reflux control for Barrett`s oesophagus.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2001;
15
519-524
65
Umansky M, Yasui W, Hallak A. et al .
Proton pump inhibitors reduce cell cycle abnormalities in Barrett’s esophagus.
Oncogene.
2001;
29
7987-7991
66
Anforderung an die Hygiene bei der Aufbereitung flexibler Endoskope und endoskopischen Zusatzinstrumentariums .
Empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention beim Robert Koch-Institut.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz.
2002;
45
395-411
67
Anforderung an die Hygiene bei der Aufbereitung von Medizinprodukten .
Empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention beim Robert-Koch-Institut und des Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte zu den „Anforderungen an die Hygiene bei der Aufbereitung von Medizinprodukten”.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz.
2001;
44
1115-1126
68
Emde C, Garner A, Blum A L.
Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations.
Gut.
1987;
28
1177-1188
69 Galmiche J P, Scarpignato C. Esophageal pH monitoring. Scarpignato C, Galmiche JP Functional investigation in esophageal disease Basel; Karger 1994: 71-108
70
Mattox H E, Richter J E.
Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Med.
1990;
89
345-356
71
McLauchlan G, Buchanan N M, Crean G P. et al .
An endoscopic procedure for accurate localisation of intraluminal pH electrodes.
Endoscopy.
1987;
19
124-126
72
Vandenplas Y, Helven R, Goyvaerts H.
Comparative study of glass and antimony electrodes for continuous oesophageal pH monitoring.
Gut.
1991;
32
708-712
73
Ask P, Edwall G, Johansson K E.
Accuracy and choice of procedures in 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring with monocrystalline antimony electrodes.
Med Biol Eng Comput.
1986;
24
602-608
74
Richter J E, Bradley L A, DeMeester T R. et al .
Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender.
Dig Dis Sci.
1992;
37
849-856
75
Anggiansah A, Sumboonnanonda K, Wang J. et al .
Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeters above the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux.
AmJ Gastroenterol.
1993;
88
842-846
76 Johansson K E, Tibbling L. Evaluation of the 24-hour pH test at two different levels of the esophagus. DeMeester TR, Skinner DB Esophageal disorders: pathophysiology and therapy New York; Raven Press 1985: 579-582
77
Lehman G, Rogers D, Cravens E. et al .
Prolonged pH probe testing less than 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES): Establishing normal control values.
Gastroenterology.
1990;
98
A77
78
de Ruiz L eon A, Sevilla-Mantilla C, de la Perez S erna J. et al .
Simultaneous two-level esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with mild and severe esophagitis. Does probe position influence results of esophageal monitoring?.
Dig Dis Sci.
1995;
40
1423-1427
79
Shaker R, Dodds W J, Helm J F. et al .
Regional esophageal distribution and clearance of refluxed gastric acid.
Gastroenterology.
1991;
101
355-359
80
Singh P, Taylor R H, Colin-Jones D G.
Simultaneous two level oesophageal pH monitoring in healthy controls and patients with oesophagitis: comparison between two positions.
Gut.
1994;
35
304-308
81
DeVault K R, Castell D O.
A simplified technique for accurate placement of ambulatory pH probes.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1991;
86
380-381
82
Singh S, Price J E, Richter J E.
The LES locator: accurate placement of an electrode for 24-hour pH measurement with a combined solid state pressure transducer.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1992;
87
967-970
83
Klauser A G, Schindlbeck N E, Müller-Lissner S A.
Esophageal 24-h pH monitoring: is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode?.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1990;
85
1463-1467
84
Klingler P J, Hinder R A, Wetscher G J. et al .
Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95
906-909
85 Marples M I, Mughal M, Bancewicz J. Can an esophageal pH electrode be accurately positioned without manometry?. Siewert JR, Hoelscher AH Diseases of the esophagus Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 1987: 789-791
86
Mattox H E, Richter J E, Sinclair J W. et al .
Gastroesophageal pH step-up inaccurately locates proximal border of lower esophageal sphincter.
Dig Dis Sci.
1992;
37
1185-1191
87
Pehl C, Boccali I, Wendl B. et al .
Results of dual probe pH-metry with probe positioning either by manometry or pH step-up in healthy volunteers and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gut.
1999;
45 (Suppl. V)
A46
88
Rokkas T H, Anggiansah A, Dorrington L. et al .
Accurate positioning of the pH-probe in the oesophagus without manometry.
Ital J Gastroenterol.
1987;
19
176-178
89 Walther B, DeMeester T R. Placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. DeMeester TR, Skinner DB Esophageal disorders: Pathophysiology and therapy New York; Raven Press 1985: 539-541
90
DA Vincent J r, Garrett J D, Radionoff S L. et al .
The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database.
J Voice.
2000;
14
247-254
91
Williams R BH, Ali G N, Wallace K L. et al .
Esophagopharyngeal acid regurgitation: dual pH monitoring criteria for its detection and insights into mechanisms.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
117
1051-1061
92
Ulualp S O, Toohill R J, Shaker R.
Pharyngeal acid reflux in patients with single and multiple otolaryngologic disorders.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1999;
121
725-730
93
Ergun G A, Kahrilas P J.
Clinical applications of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
1077-1089
94
Hendrix T R.
pH monitoring: is it the gold standard for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease?.
Dysphagia.
1993;
8
122-124
95
Clark C S, Kraus B B, Sinclair J. et al .
Gastroesophageal reflux induced by exercise in healthy volunteers.
JAMA.
1989;
261
3599-3601
96
Shawdon A.
Gastro-oesophageal reflux and exercise. Important pathology to consider in the athletic population.
Sports Med.
1995;
20
109-116
97
Richter J E.
Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.
Am J Med.
1997;
103 (Suppl. 5A)
130-134
98
Savarino V, Mela G S, Zentilin P. et al .
Esophageal pH monitoring: factors influencing the definition of normality.
Minerva Chir.
1991;
46
103-109
99
Wo J M, Castell D O.
Exclusion of meal periods from ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring may improve diagnosis of esophageal acid reflux.
Dig Dis Sci.
1994;
39
1601-1607
100
Shay S S, Conwell D L, Mehindru V. et al .
The effect of posture on gastroesophageal reflux event frequency and composition during fasting.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
54-60
101
Jamieson J R, Stein H J, DeMeester T R. et al .
Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1992;
87
1102-1111
102
Bianchi P orro G, Pace F.
Comparison of three methods of intraesophageal pH recordings in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1988;
23
743-750
103
Dhiman R K, Saraswat V A, Mishra A. et al .
Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Dig Dis Sci.
1996;
41
764-772
104
Dobhan R, Castell D O.
Prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring with 16-hr overnight recording. Comparison with ‘24-hr’ analysis.
Dig Dis Sci.
1992;
37
857-864
105
Fink S M, McCallum R W.
The role of prolonged esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.
JAMA.
1984;
252
1160-1164
106
Grande L, Pujol A, Ros E. et al .
Intraesophageal pH monitoring after breakfast + lunch in gastroesophageal reflux.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1988;
10
373-376
107
Jorgensen F, Elsborg L, Hesse B.
The diagnostic value of computerized short-term oesophageal pH-monitoring in suspected gastrooesophageal reflux.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1988;
23
363-368
108
Schindlbeck N E, Ippisch H, Klauser A G. et al .
Which pH threshold is best in esophageal pH monitoring.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1991;
86
1138-1141
109
Dinelli M, Passaretti S, Di Francia I. et al .
Area under pH 4: a more sensitive parameter for the quantitative analysis of esophageal acid exposure in adults.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
3139-3144
110
Ter R B, Johnston B T, Castell D O.
Exclusion of meal period improves the clinical reliability of esophageal pH monitoring.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1997;
25
314-316
111
Tovar J A, Izquierdo M A, Eizaguirre I.
The area under pH curve: a single-figure parameter representative of esophageal acid exposure.
J Pediatr Surg.
1991;
26
163-167
112
Vandenplas Y, Franckx-Gossens A, Pipeleers-Marichal M. et al .
Area under pH 4: advantages of a new parameter in the interpretation of esophageal pH monitoring data in infants.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.
1989;
9
34-39
113
Johnson L F, DeMeester T R.
Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1986;
8 (Suppl. 1)
52-58
114
Schindlbeck N E, Heinrich C, König A. et al .
Optimal thresholds, sensitivity, and specificity of long-term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gastroenterology.
1987;
93
85-90
115
Vandenplas Y, Helven R, Goyvaerts H. et al .
Reproducibility of continuous 24 hour oesophageal pH monitoring in infants and children.
Gut.
1990;
31
374-377
116
Ward B W, Wu W C, Richter J E. et al .
Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. technology searching for a clinical application.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1986;
8 (Suppl. 1)
59-67
117
Wiener G J, Morgan T M, Copper J B. et al .
Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters.
Dig Dis Sci.
1988;
33
1127-1133
118
Parilla P, de Martinez H aro LF, Ortiz A. et al .
Can pH recordings suggest defective esophageal peristalsis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1992;
27
929-932
119
Stanciu C, Bennett J R.
Oesophageal acid clearing: one factor in the production of reflux oesophagitis.
Gut.
1974;
15
852-857
120
Orenstein S R, Izadnia F, Khan S.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am.
1999;
28
947-969
121
Vandenplas Y, Goyvaerts H, Helven R. et al .
Gastroesophageal reflux, as measured by 24-hour pH monitoring, in 509 healthy infants screened for risk of sudden infant death syndrome.
Pediatrics.
1991;
88
834-840
122
Boesby S.
Continuous oesophageal pH recording and acid-clearing test. A study of reproducibility.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1977;
12
245-247
123
Bontempo I, Corazziari E, Tosoni M. et al .
Reproducibility of esophageal pH-metric measurements.
Gastroenterology.
1985;
88
A1331
124
Hampton F J, MacFayden U M, Simpson H.
Reproducibility of 24 hour oesophageal pH studies in infants.
Arch Dis Child.
1990;
65
1249-1254
125
Herrera J L, Simpson I II JK, Maydonovitch C L. et al .
Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring recording systems.
Dig Dis Sci.
1988;
33
385-388
126
Johnsson F, Joelsson B.
Reproducibility of ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring.
Gut.
1988;
29
886-889
127
Hampton F J, MacFayden U M, Mayberry J F.
Variations in results of simultaneous ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.
Dig Dis Sci.
1992;
37
506-512
128
128 M urphy DW, Faust K B, Chiantella V M. et al .
Assessment of accuracy of intraesophageal pH probe in a dog model.
Dig Dis Sci.
1989;
34
1079-1084
129
Murphy D W, Yuan Y, Castell D O.
Does the intraesophageal pH probe accurately detect acid reflux? Simultaneous recording with two pH probes in humans.
Dig Dis Sci.
1989;
34
649-656
130
Patti M G, Diener U, Tamburini A. et al .
Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Dig Dis Sci.
2001;
46
597-602
131
Dobhan R, Castell D O.
Normal and abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure: results of ambulatory dual-probe pH monitoring.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1993;
88
25-29
132
Johnston B T, Collins J SA, McFarland R J. et al .
Are esophageal symptoms reflux-related? A study of different scoring systems in a cohort of patients with heartburn.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1994;
89
497-502
133
Watson R GP, Tham T CK, Johnston B T. et al .
Double-blind cross-over placebo controlled study of omeprazole in the treatment of patients with reflux symptoms and physiological levels of acid reflux - the ‘sensitive oesophagus’.
Gut.
1997;
40
587-590
134
Baldi F, Ferrarini F, Longanesi A. et al .
Acid gastroesophageal reflux and symptom occurrence. Analysis of some factors influencing their association.
Dig Dis Sci.
1989;
34
1890-1893
135
Weusten B LAM, Akkermans L MA, vanBerge-Henegouwen G P. et al .
Symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease is dependent on spatiotemporal reflux characteristics.
Gastroenterology.
1995;
108
1739-1744
136
Smith J L, Opekun A R, Larkai E. et al .
Sensitivity of the esophageal mucosa to pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gastroenterology.
1989;
96
683-689
137
Rodriguez-Stanley S, Robinson M, Earnest D L. et al .
Esophageal hypersensitivity may be a major cause of heartburn.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
628-631
138
Fass R, Pulliam G, Johnson C. et al .
Symptom severity and oesophageal chemosensitivity to acid in older and young patients with gastrooesophageal reflux.
Age Aging.
2000;
29
125-130
139
Bradley L A, Richter J E, Pulliam T J. et al .
The relationship between stress and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux: the influence of psychological factors.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1993;
88
11-19
140
Johnston B T, Lewis S A, Love A HG.
Psychological factors in gastrooesophageal reflux disease.
Gut.
1995;
36
481-482
141
Trimble K C, Pryde A, Heading R C.
Lowered oesophageal sensory thresholds in patients with symptomatic but not excess gastrooesophageal reflux: evidence for a spectrum of visceral sensitivity in GORD.
Gut.
1995;
37
7-12
142
Fass R, Naliboff B, Higa L. et al .
Differential effect of long-term esophageal acid exposure on mechanosensitivity and chemosensitivity in humans.
Gastroenterology.
1998;
115
1363-1373
143
Breumelhof R, Nadorp J HSM, Akkermans L MA. et al .
Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain.
Gastroenterology.
1990;
99
1257-1264
144
Ghillebert G, Janssens J, Vantrappen G. et al .
Ambulatory 24 hour intraoesophageal pH and pressure recordings v provocation tests in the diagnosis of chest pain of oesophageal origin.
Gut.
1990;
31
738-744
145
Lam H GT, Breumelhof R, Roelofs J MM. et al .
What is the optimal time window in symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data?.
Dig Dis Sci.
1994;
39
402-409
146
Peters L, Maas L, Petty D. et al .
Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring.
Gastroenterology.
1988;
94
878-886
147
Soffer E E, Scalabrini P, Wingate D L.
Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain: value of ambulatory esophageal pH and motility monitoring.
Dig Dis Sci.
1989;
34
1651-1655
148
Singh S, Richter J E, Bradley L A. et al .
The symptom index. Differential usefulness in suspected acid-related complaints of heartburn and chest pain.
Dig Dis Sci.
1993;
38
1402-1408
149
Wiener G J, Richter J E, Copper J B. et al .
The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1988;
83
358-361
150
Hewson E G, Sinclair J W, Dalton C B. et al .
Acid perfusion test: does it have a role in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain?.
Gut.
1989;
30
305-310
151
Howard P J, Maher L, Pryde A. et al .
Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, and mucosal acid sensitivity are three separate, though related, aspects of gastrooesophageal reflux disease.
Gut.
1991;
32
128-132
152
Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Gudmundsson K. et al .
Symptoms and endoscopic findings in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1987;
22
714-718
153
Breumelhof R, Smout A JPM.
The symptom sensitivity index: a valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1991;
86
160-164
154
Lloyd D A, Borda I T.
Food-induced heartburn: Effect of osmolality.
Gastroenterology.
1981;
80
740-741
155
Price S F, Smithson K W, Castell D O.
Food sensitivity in reflux esophagitis.
Gastroenterology.
1978;
75
240-243
156
Yeoh K G, Ho K Y, Guan R. et al .
How does chili cause upper gastrointestinal symptoms? A correlation study with esophageal mucosal sensitivity and esophageal motility.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1995;
21
87-90
157
Vela M F, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R. et al .
Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid reflux: effect of omeprazole.
Gastroenterology.
2001;
120
1599-1606
158
Weusten B LAM, Roelofs J MM, Akkermans L MA. et al .
The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data.
Gastroenterology.
1994;
107
1741-1745
159
Armstrong D, Emde C, Inauen W. et al .
Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs what is practical.
Hepatogastroenterology.
1992;
39 (Suppl. 1)
3-13
160
Emde C, Armstrong D, Blum A L.
Chest pain due to gastroesophageal reflux: presentation of a mathematical procedure to assess its significance.
J Gastrointest Motil.
1990;
2
140
161
Sacher-Huvelin S, Gournay J, Amouretti M. et al .
Oesophage acido-sensible: histoire naturelle et retentissement sur la qualité de vie. Comparaison avec le reflux gastro-oesophagien. [Acid-sensitive esophagus: natural history and effect on the quality of life. Comparison with gastroesophageal reflux].
Gastroenterol Clin Biol.
2000;
24
911-916
162
Bell R, Hanna P, Brubaker S.
Laparoscopic fundoplication for symptomatic but physiologic gastroesophageal reflux.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2001;
5
462-467
163
Biacabe B, Gleich L L, Laccourreye O. et al .
Silent gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with pharyngolaryngeal cancer: further results.
Head Neck.
1998;
20
510-514
164
Freije J E, Beatty T W, Campbell B H. et al .
Carcinoma of the larynx in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Otolaryngol.
1996;
17
386-390
165
Hogan W J.
Spectrum of supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Am J Med.
1997;
103 (Suppl. 5A)
77-83
166
Johanson J F.
Epidemiology of esophageal and supraesophageal reflux injuries.
Am J Med.
2000;
108 (Suppl. 4A)
99-103
167
McNally P R, Maydonovitch C L, Prosek R A.
Hoarseness and gastroesophageal reflux: what is the relationship?.
Dig Dis Sci.
1989;
34
1900-1904
168
Morrison M D.
Is chronic gastroesophageal reflux a causative factor in glottic carcinoma?.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1988;
99
370-373
169
Tobin R W, Pope C E, Pellegrini C A. et al .
Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med.
1998;
158
1804-1808
170
Toohill R J, Kuhn J C.
Role of refluxed acid in pathogenesis of laryngeal disorders.
AM J Med.
1997;
103 (Suppl. 5A)
100-106
171
Ward P H, Hanson D G.
Reflux as an etiological factor of carcinoma of the laryngopharynx.
Laryngoscope.
1988;
98
1195-1199
1 * Ehemals Arbeitskreis für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten.
PD Dr. Christian Pehl
Städtisches Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen
Englschalkinger Straße 77
81925 München