References
1a
Cowden CJ.
Paterson I. In
Organic Reactions
Vol. 51:
Paquette LA.
John
Wiley & Sons;
New York:
1997.
p.1
1b
Carreira EM. In
Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis
Vol.
3:
Jacobsen EN.
Pfaltz A.
Yamamoto H.
Springer;
Heidelberg:
1999.
p.997
2a
Norcross RD.
Paterson I.
Chem.
Rev.
1995,
95:
2041
2b
Faul MM.
Huff BE.
Chem.
Rev.
2000,
100:
2407
3a
Paterson I.
Goodman JM.
Isaka M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1989,
30:
7121
3b
Corey EJ.
Kim SS.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
1990,
112:
4976
3c
Walker MA.
Heathcock CH.
J.
Org. Chem.
1991,
56:
5747
3d
Evans DA.
Ng HP.
Clark JS.
Rieger DL.
Tetrahedron
1992,
48:
2127
3e
Paterson I.
Wallace DJ.
Velázquez SM.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1994,
35:
9083
3f
Ghosh AK.
Onishi M.
J. Am. Chem.
Soc.
1996,
118:
2527
3g
Wang Y.-C.
Hung A.-W.
Chang C.-S.
Yan T.-H.
J. Org. Chem.
1996,
61:
2038
3h
Abiko A.
Liu J.-F.
Masamune S.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
1997,
119:
2586
3i
Evans DA.
Tedrow JS.
Shaw JT.
Downey CW.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
392
3j
Yamashita Y.
Ishitani H.
Shimizu H.
Kobayashi S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
3292
4a
Cosp A.
Romea P.
Talavera P.
Urpí F.
Vilarrasa J.
Font-Bardia M.
Solans X.
Org. Lett.
2001,
3:
615
4b
Cosp A.
Romea P.
Urpí F.
Vilarrasa J.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2001,
42:
4629
Diallyl and dibenzyl acetals have
been prepared according to reported procedures:
5a
Tsunoda T.
Suzuki M.
Noyori R.
Tetrahedron
Lett.
1980,
21:
1357
5b
Brogan JB.
Richard JE.
Zercher CK.
Synth. Commun.
1995,
25:
587
6a
Greene TW.
Wuts PGM. In
Protective Groups
in Organic Synthesis
3rd ed.:
John
Wiley & Sons;
New York:
1999.
6b
Kocienski PJ. In
Protecting Groups
Thieme;
Stuttgart:
1994.
7 Yields lower than 50% were
usually obtained under the reported conditions.
8 Di-(p-methoxybenzyloxy)
acetal derived from isobutyr-aldehyde, i-PrCH(OPMB)2,
was also tested. In this case, complex reaction mixtures were obtained
because of the unstability of the corresponding oxocarbenium intermediate.
9
Typical Experimental
Procedure. Neat TiCl4 (0.12 mL, 1.1 mmol) was added
dropwise to a solution of 1 (217 mg, 1.0
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (8 mL), at 0 °C under
N2. The yellow suspension was stirred for 5 min at 0 °C,
cooled at -78 °C, and a solution of i-Pr2EtN (0.19 mL, 1.1 mmol)
in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added. The dark red enolate
solution was stirred for 2 h at -40 °C, and 1
M SnCl4 in CH2Cl2 (1.1 mL, 1.1
mmol) followed by acetal g (314 mg, 1.1
mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) were successively added
dropwise at -78 °C. The resulting mixture was
stirred at -78 °C for 15 min and kept at -20 °C for
2 h. The reaction was cooled at -78 °C and quenched
by the addition of saturated NH4Cl (8 mL) with vigorous stirring.
The layers were separated. The aqueous layer was re-extracted with
CH2Cl2, and the combined organic extracts were
dried (Na2SO4), filtered, concentrated, and
analyzed by HPLC. Purification by flash column chromatography on deactivated
(2.5% Et3N) silica gel (from hexanes to hexanes/CH2Cl2 1:1),
afforded 278 mg (71%) of the major diastereomer 2g: Yellow oil. Rf = 0.6
(CH2Cl2). HPLC (hexanes/EtOAc 98:2) t
R = 17.2 min. [α]D = +106.5
(c = 0.75, CHCl3).
IR (film) 2957, 2861, 1699, 1684, 1653, 1559, 1456, 1364, 1256,
1157, 1094 cm-1. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40-7.20 (5
H, m, ArH), 5.25 (1 H, ddd, J = 8.5 Hz, J = 5.3 Hz, J = 1.4
Hz, NCH), 5.13-5.07 (1 H, m, COCHCH3), 4.61
(1 H, d, J = 11.4 Hz, OCHxHyPh),
4.55 (1 H, d, J = 11.4 Hz, OCHxHyPh),
4.06 (1 H, ddd, J = 9.4 Hz,
J = 6.5 Hz, J = 2.7
Hz, CHOBn), 3.43 (1 H, dd, J = 11.5
Hz, J = 8.5 Hz, SCHxHy),
2.94 (1 H, dd, J = 11.5 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, SCHxHy),
2.19 [1 H, hepd, J = 6.9
Hz, J = 5.3 Hz, NCHCH(CH3)2],
1.87-1.79 [1 H, m, CHxHyCH(CH3)2],
1.57 [1 H, ddd, J = 10.2
Hz, J = 9.4 Hz, J = 4.1 Hz, CHxHyCH(CH3)2],
1.30-1.23 [1 H, m, CH2CH(CH3)2],
1.16 (3 H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, COCHCH3),
0.93 (3 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, CH3),
0.92 (3 H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, CH3),
0.89 (3 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, CH3),
0.87 (3 H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH3). 13C
NMR (75.4 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.5 (C), 176.1 (C),
138.8 (C), 128.1 (CH), 127.6 (CH), 127.3 (CH), 78.0 (CH), 71.8 (CH),
71.7 (CH2), 42.1 (CH), 39.5 (CH2), 30.8 (CH),
29.1 (CH2), 24.5 (CH), 24.1 (CH3), 21.9 (CH3),
19.0 (CH3), 16.9 (CH3), 12.5 (CH3). HRMS(+FAB):
calcd for [M + H]+ C21H32NO2S2 394.1874, found
394.1891.
10 The stereochemistry of the adducts
has been assigned by analogy. The absolute stereochemistry of 2i has been confirmed by chemical correlation.
Acetal 4 was
prepared from commercially available methyl (S)-3-hydroxy-2-methyl
propionate following reported procedures:
11a
Ley SV.
Anthony NJ.
Armstrong A.
Brasca MG.
Clarke T.
Culshaw D.
Greck C.
Grice P.
Jones AB.
Lygo B.
Madin A.
Sheppard RN.
Slawin AMZ.
Williams DJ.
Tetrahedron
1989,
45:
7161
11b
Roush WR.
Palkowitz AD.
Ando K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990,
112:
6348
12 Selected data for 5. [α]D = +75.5
(c = 0.75, CHCl3). 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70-7.60 (4
H, m, ArH), 7.46-7.14 (11 H, m, ArH), 5.31 (1 H, ddd, J = 8.5 Hz, J = 5.5
Hz, J = 1.2 Hz, NCH), 5.07 (1
H, dq, J = 9.9 Hz, J = 6.9 Hz, COCHCH3),
4.67 (1 H, d, J = 11.7 Hz, OCHxHyPh),
4.61 (1 H, d, J = 11.7 Hz, OCHxHyPh),
4.30 (1 H, dd, J = 9.9 Hz,
J = 1.7 Hz, CHOBn),
3.67 (1 H, dd, J = 10.1 Hz, J = 9.3 Hz, CHxHyOSi),
3.56 (1 H, dd, J = 10.1 Hz, J = 6.2 Hz, CHxHyOSi),
3.35 (1 H, dd, J = 11.4 Hz, J = 8.5 Hz, SCHxHy), 2.88
(1 H, dd, J = 11.4 Hz, J = 1.2 Hz, SCHxHy),
2.10-2.03 [1 H, m, CH(CH3)2],
1.98-1.85 (1 H, m, CHCH2OSi), 1.08 [9
H, s, SiC(CH3)3], 1.07 (3 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, COCHCH3), 0.82
(6 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 × CH3),
0.81 (3 H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH3). 13C
NMR (75.4 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.6 (C), 177.0 (C), 139.4
(C), 135.6 (CH), 135.5 (CH), 133.8 (C), 133.7 (C), 129.7 (CH), 129.6
(CH), 128.0 (CH), 127.6 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 80.3 (CH),
74.3 (CH2), 71.8 (CH), 64.1 (CH2), 41.4 (CH),
37.3 (CH), 30.9 (CH), 28.7 (CH2), 26.9 (CH3),
19.2 (C), 19.0 (CH3), 16.8 (CH3), 15.1 (CH3),
9.8 (CH3). HRMS(+FAB): calcd for [M + H]+ C36H48NO3SiS2 634.2845,
found 634.2823.
13
Masamune S.
Choy W.
Petersen JS.
Sita LR.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl.
1985,
24:
1