Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2003; 19(2): 209-222
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40006
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Midfacial Rejuvenation

Brent R.W.  Moelleken
  • Private Practice, Beverly Hills, CA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 June 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The midface is an important new area in facial rejuvenation. Rejuvenation of the midface is necessary to achieve harmonious rejuvenation of the face. The extent of “lift” to be achieved with midfacial elevation is very limited. Excessive elevation of midfacial tissues results in vertical shortening of the lower eyelid, round eye deformity, and ectropion. In patients with previous blepharoplasty or midfacelifts, minimal or no tissue can be resected. Instead, any midfacial advancement achieved is required to reconstruct the lower eyelid form and allow a canthoplasty or canthopexy to heal without undue downward traction on the repair. The surgeon must elevate the midface tissue in a very limited, safe fashion. Many current approaches to midfacial rejuvenation exist in a number of anatomic planes, with several fixation techniques. Some surgical approaches, such as surgery in a suborbicularis plane, may be inherently safer than others. Aesthetic micromanagement of the lower eyelid position and orbicularis muscle is possible. A useful test for assessing the amount of available midfacial tissue is provided.

KEYWORDS

Midfacial rejuvenation - blepharoplasty - aesthetic micromanagement

REFERENCES

  • 1 Campiglio G L, Candiani P. Anatomical study on the temporal fascial layers and their relationships with the facial nerve.  Aesthetic Plast Surg . 1997;  21 72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Yaremchuk M J. Subperiosteal and full-thickness skin rhytidectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2001;  107 1585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mendelson B C, Muzaffar A R, Adams W P. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 (Sep);  110(3) 885-911
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Owsley J Q. Lifting the malar fat pad.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1993;  91 463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Owsley J Q, Zweifler M. Midface lift of the malar fat pad: technical advances.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2002;  110(2) 674-685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 McCord C D, Codner M A, Hester T R. Redraping the inferior orbicularis arc.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  102 2471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fogli A L. Orbicularis muscleplasty and facelift: a better orbital contour.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1995;  96 1560
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hinderer U T, Urriolagoita F, Vildosola R. The blepharo-periorbitoplasty: anatomical basis.  Ann Plast Surg . 1987;  18 437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Trepsat F. Facelift of the malar, jugal and nasolabial regions.  Ann Chir Plast Esthet . 1994;  39 597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ramirez O M, Pozner J N. Subperiosteal minimally invasive laser endoscopic rhytidectomy: the SMILE facelift.  Aesthet Plast Surg . 1996;  20(6) 463-470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Namazie A R, Keller G S. Current practices in endoscopic brow and temporal lifting.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am . 2001;  9(3) 439-451
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Edelstein C, Balch K, Schorr N, Goldberg R A. The transeyelid subperiosteal midface-lift in the unhappy postblepharoplasty patient.  Semin Ophthalmol . 1998;  13(3) 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hamra S T. The zygorbicular dissection in composite rhytidectomy: an ideal midface plane.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  102(5) 1646-1657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Moelleken B. The superficial subciliary cheeklift, a technique for rejuvenating the infraorbital region and nasojugal groove: a clinical series of 71 patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104(6) 1863-1874
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gunter J P, Hackney F L. Plast Reconstr Surg .  1999;  103(7) 2029-2035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Finger E R. A 5-year study of the transmalar subperiosteal midface lift with minimal skin and superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection: a durable, natural appearing lift with less surgery and recovery time.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2001;  15(107-5) 1273-1283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hobar P C, Flood J. Subperiosteal rejuvenation of the midface and periorbital area: a simplified approach.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104(3) 842-851
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Anderson R D, Lo M W. Endoscopic malar/midface suspension procedure.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1998;  102(6) 2196-2208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sasaki G H, Cohen A T. Meloplication of the malar fat pads by percutaneous cable-suture technique for midface rejuvenation: outcome study (392 cases, 6 years' experience).  Plast Reconstr Surg . 2002;  110(2) 635-654
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Whitaker L A, Bartlett S P. Skeletal alterations as a basis for facial rejuvenation.  Clin Plast Surg . 1991;  18(1) 197-203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Binder W J. Submalar augmentation: a procedure to enhance rhytidectomy.  Ann Plast Surg . 1990;  24(3) 200-212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Binder W J, Moelleken B RW, Tobias G. Aesthetic facial implants. In: Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery New York: Thieme Medical Publishers 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Campiglio G L, Candiani P. Anatomical study on the temporal fascial layers and their relationships with the facial nerve.  Aesthetic Plast Surg . 1997;  21 72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Moelleken B. Rejuvenation of the upper and midface. In: Mathes et al., ed. Plastic Surgery Philadelphia: WB Saunders in press
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Moelleken B. The superficial subciliary cheeklift, a technique for rejuvenating the infraorbital region and nasojugal groove: a clinical series of 71 patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1999;  104(6) 1863-1874
    PubMedGoogle Scholar