Cresyl Violet as a Fluorophore in Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy for Future In-Vivo Histopathology

Background and Study Aims: Confocal laser scanning microscopy appears to be a key technology for future endoluminal diagnostic tools for obtaining noninvasive optical biopsies. Until now, clinical use of this technique has been problematic, as successfully tested dyes are toxic. In the present study, cresyl violet acetate was evaluated as a nontoxic staining agent for in-vivo histopathology. Materials and Methods: Esophageal and gastric mucosa from the swine was obtained and examined ex vivo with a commercially available confocal laser scanning microscope. A series of images was recorded for concentrations of cresyl violet ranging from 0.1 % to 10 % for both esophageal and gastric mucosa. Staining was carried out for 2 min after mucolysis with acetylcysteine. Results: Staining with 2 % cresyl violet led to identification of nuclei and cell membranes. Lower concentrations were associated with a lack of homogeneous dye absorption in particular in the gastric mucosa. Conclusions: Cresyl violet is a clinically usable fluorophore for confocal laser scanning microscopy. Its use in combination with an endoluminally applicable system has the potential to allow in vivo histopathology.

References

• 1 Stepp H, Sroka R, Baumgartner R. Fluorescence endoscopy of gastrointestinal diseases: basic principles, techniques, and clinical experience.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 379-386
• 2 Mayinger B, Horner P, Jordan M. et al . Light-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy for the endoscopic detection of esophageal cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 195-201
• 3 Li X D, Boppart S A, van Dam J. et al . Optical coherence tomography: advanced technology for the endoscopic imaging of Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2000;  33 921-930
• 4 Jackle S, Gladkova N, Feldchtein F. et al . In vivo endoscopic optical coherence tomography of esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 750-755
• 5 König F, Knittel J, Stepp H. Diagnosing cancer in vivo.  Science. 2001;  291 1401
• 6 Izatt J A, Kulkarni M D, Wang H W. et al . Optical coherence tomography and microscopy in gastrointestinal tissues.  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 1996;  24 1017-1028
• 7 George M, Raestrup H, Schnieder L, Buess G F. Optical coherence microscopy for squamous and columnar epithelium discrimination: potential and clinical applicability. Proceedings of CARS 2001.  Elsevier International Congress Series. 2001;  1230 1023-1028
• 8 Inoue H, Igari T, Nishikage T. et al . A novel method of virtual histopathology using laser-scanning confocal microscopy in-vitro with untreated fresh specimens from the gastrointestinal mucosa.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 439-443
• 9 Kudo S, Rubio C A, Teixeira C R. et al . Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 367-373
• 10 Kiesslich R, Jung M. Magnification endoscopy: does it improve mucosal surface analysis for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplasias?.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 819-822
• 11 Tajiri H, Doi T, Endo H. et al . Routine endoscopy using a magnifying endoscope for gastric cancer diagnosis.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 772-777
• 12 Lambert R, Rey J F. Endoscopy and early neoplasia: better but not the best.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 348-352
• 13 Knittel J, Schnieder L, Buess G. et al . Endoscope-compatible confocal microscope using a gradient-index-lens system.  Opt Commun. 2001;  188 267-273