Endoscopy 2003; 35(9): 761-764
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41586
Kos Symposium
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Recommendations of the ESGE Workshop on Ethics in Teaching and Learning Endoscopy

First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003A.  T.  Axon, L.  Aabakken, P.  Malfertheiner, I.  Danielides, S.  Ladas, J.  Hochberger, C.  Williams, D.  Campbell, M.  S.  Zakaria
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
20. August 2003 (online)

Introduction

The ethical implications of teaching and training in gastrointestinal endoscopy can be derived from the basic principle of Hippocrates: ”to help or at least not to harm”. The goal of ethical teaching can be summarized as follows:

To train endoscopists to a high level of expertise in a way that does not harm patients and exposes patients to training in a fair way and respects their right to self-determination.

While these statements are easily agreed upon, training raises a variety of ethical considerations and dilemmas, the most obvious being: how can we justify exposing patients to a trainee, when the doctor as well as the patient may appreciate that a procedure performed by a trainee may be of a quality inferior to that performed by a fully trained expert?

References

  • 1 European Board of Gastroenterology .Charter on training of medical specialists in the EU. Requirements for the specialty of gastro-enterology. Brussels; European Union of Medical Specialists 1995: 1-5. http://www.uems.be/gastro-e.htm
  • 2 Beattie A D, Greff M, Lamy V, Mallinson C N. The European Diploma of Gastroenterology: progress towards harmonization of standards.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;  8 403-406
  • 3 Farthing M JG, Walt R P, Allan R M. et al . A national training programme for gastroenterology and hepatology.  Gut. 1996;  38 459-470
  • 4 Friedman L S, Taylor I L. Development of a core curriculum for gastroenterology fellowship training. Proc 2nd GLC (Gastroenterology Leadership Council) training directors workshop: the effects of changes in government policy on training in gastroenterology.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 644-645
  • 5 Vennes J A, Ament M, Boyce H W, Jr.. et al . Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Standards of Training Committees. 1989-1990.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 743-746
  • 6 Ahuja V, Tandon R K. Ethics in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. In: Stanciu C, Ladas S (ed) Medical ethics. Focus on gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy. Athens; BETA Medical Arts 2002: 97-108
  • 7 Plumeri P A. Endoscopic training directors: a few legal and ethical considerations.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;  5 447-455
  • 8 Tassios P S, Ladas S D, Grammenos I. et al . Acquisition of competence in colonoscopy: the learning curve of trainees.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 702-706
  • 9 Galandiuk S, Ahmad P. Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy.  Dig Surg. 1998;  15 60-63
  • 10 Marshall J B. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 371-373
  • 11 Bar-Meir S. A new endoscopic simulator.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 98-100
  • 12 Hochberger J, Maiss J, Magdeburg B. et al . Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and perspectives in 2001.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 541-549

L. Aabakken, MD. Chief of GI Endoscopy 

Department of Medicine · Rikshospitalet University Hospital

0027 Oslo · Norway

Fax: +47-2307-2008

eMail: larsaa@klinmed.uio.no