J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19(7): 451-454
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44632
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Deep Peroneal Nerve Transfer for Established Plantar Sensory Loss

Isao Koshima, Yuzaburo Nanba, Tetsuya Tsutsui, Yoshio Takahashi
  • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. November 2003 (online)

ABSTRACT

Patients with established or irreversible plantar sensory loss often have normal sensation on the dorsal aspect of the foot, due to an intact deep peroneal nerve. A new method of deep peroneal nerve transfer is proposed for repair of plantar sensory loss caused by extensive nerve gaps or high-level lesions of the posterior tibial nerve. Two cases in which this technique was used are described. The surgical technique is relatively easy, with a short operating time, rapid nerve regeneration after surgery, accurate sensory recovery, and minimal donor-site morbidity with sensory loss only on the first web space of the foot.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sunderland S. Nerve cross-union, nerve grafting and related methods of nerve repair. In: Nerve Injuries and Their Repair: A Critical Appraisal Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 1991: 488-492
  • 2 Sunderland S. The restoration of median nerve function after destructive lesions which preclude end-to-end repair.  Brain . 1974;  97 1-14
  • 3 Bedeschi P, Celli L, Balli A. Transfer of sensory nerves in hand surgery.  J Hand Surg . 1984;  9B 46-49
  • 4 Greene T L, Steichen J B. Digital nerve grafting using the dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve.  J Hand Surg . 1985;  10B 37-40
  • 5 Mackinnon S E, McLean J A, Hunter G A. Direct muscle neurotization recovers gastrocnemius muscle function.  J Reconstr Microsurg . 1993;  9 77-80
  • 6 Mackinnon S E, Novak C B. Nerve transfers: new options for reconstruction following nerve injury.  Hand Clin N America . 1999;  15 643-666