Long-Term Outcome in Bladder Detrusorectomy Augmentation

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Bladder augmentation in children can have significant benefits in terms of continence and social function. In an attempt to overcome the problems associated with using foreign mucosa in the urinary tract, techniques to increase to bladder volume and improve compliance by resecting the detrusor muscle alone have been described. Here we describe our experience using an omental-backed detrusorectomy augmentation and examine possible reasons for a poor outcome observed in some patients in the longer term.

Methods

This was a retrospective review covering an eight-year period with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Pre- and post-operative urodynamics were performed in every case.

Results

11 patients were included in the study. There were 7 male and 4 female patients with a median age of 10 years (range 4 - 16). The underlying pathology in 6 patients was myelodysplasia and in the remaining cases there was one each of ano-rectal malformation with neuropathic bladder, Guillain-Barré syndrome, a myopathy of unknown cause, transverse myelitis and one case of a non-neuropathic neuropathic bladder. Detrusorectomy provided a modest increase in bladder capacity (median 26 %) and decrease in maximum bladder pressure (median 12 %). Long-term follow-up has revealed treatment failure in 6 patients, resulting in revision augmentation surgery in 3 (with surgery planned in a further 2), and one patient developing end-stage renal failure. Notable complications were bladder stone formation in 4 patients and troublesome lower abdominal pain related to bladder drainage in 2. There appeared to be no correlation between initial diagnosis, age at operation, pre-operative urodynamics, peri- or post-operative factors, and long-term outcome.

Conclusion

In our series, omental-backed detrusorectomy for a neuropathic bladder in children resulted in a poor outcome in 55 % of cases. We were unable to identify factors that would allow this result to be predicted pre-operatively.

Child - paediatric - bladder augmentation - detrusorectomy - long-term follow-up

References

• 1 Adams M C. Urinary tract reconstruction in children. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED et al Campbell's Urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia; Saunders 2002: 2508-2563
• 2 Carr M C, Docimo S G, Mitchell M E. Bladder augmentation with urothelial preservation.  J Urol. 1999;  162 1133-1136
• 3 Cartwright P C, Snow B W. Bladder autoaugmentation: early clinical experience.  J Urol. 1989;  142 505-508
• 4 Cartwright P C, Snow B W. Bladder autoaugmentation: partial detrusor excision to augment the bladder without the use of bowel.  J Urol. 1989;  142 1050-1053
• 5 Dayanc M, Kilciler M, Tan O, Gokalp A, Gokta S, Peker A F. A new approach to bladder augmentation in children: seromuscular enterocystoplasty.  BJU International. 1999;  84 103-108
• 6 Dewan P A, Stefanek W, Lorenz C, Byard R W. Autoaugmentation omentocystoplasty in a sheep model.  Urology. 1994;  43 888-891
• 7 Duel B P, Gonzalez R, Barthold J S. Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty.  J Urol. 1998;  159 998-1005
• 8 Johnson H W, Nigro M K, Stothers L, Tearle H, Arnold W J. Laboratory variables of bladder autoaugmentation in an animal model.  Urology. 1994;  44 260-263
• 9 Koff S A. Estimating bladder capacity in children.  Urology. 1983;  21 248
• 10 Lima S VC, Araujo L AP, Vilar F O, Kummner C L, Lima E C. Nonsecretory sigmoid cystoplasty: experimental and clinical results.  J Urol. 1995;  153 1651-1654
• 11 Morecroft J A, Searles J, MacKinnon A EM. Detrusorectomy with Mitrofanoff stoma.  Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996;  6 (Suppl 1) S30-S31
• 12 Oge O, Tekgul S, Ergen A, Kendi S. Urothelium-preserving augmentation cystoplasty covered with a peritoneal flap.  BJU International. 2000;  85 802-805
• 13 Perovic S V, Miroslav L J, Djordjevic J, Kekik Z K, Vukadinovic V M. Bladder autoaugmentation with rectus muscle backing.  J Urol. 2002;  168 1877-1880