Endoscopy 2004; 36(1): 3-7
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814120
State of the Art Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Colon Polyps and Cancer

O.  Kronborg1
  • 1Dept. of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 January 2004 (online)

Zoom Image

Screening for colorectal neoplasia still is the best method of reducing the mortality due to colorectal cancer, and it is to be hoped that fecal occult blood test programs will expand in the near future and be combined with appropriate endoscopy. There are substantial problems with compliance in large programs with occult blood tests as well as endoscopy. Colonography and DNA testing in feces are not yet suitable for population screening. Diagnostic strategies in symptomatic patients are becoming more selective, in the hope of avoiding many superfluous examinations without increasing the risk of missing cancers. New results have confirmed the preventive effect of long-term aspirin use on adenoma recurrence, but the most cost-effective dosage is not clear; the mechanism of action is also uncertain, but seems to involve cyclooxygenase-2. The risk of adenomas does not appear to be associated with low consumption of folate, but with low intake of fiber. A number of biomarkers have been evaluated in polyp patients, but so far surveillance is still based on endoscopic experience, which is less than optimal. Attempts have been made to restrict the number of surveillance endoscopies and reduce the pathologist’s workload. The place of argon plasma coagulation has been clearly defined in connection with piecemeal removal of large sessile adenomas.
Advances have been achieved in surgery and radiotherapy for rectal cancer, and acute surgery for colonic cancer with severe obstruction will be less common after the introduction of the metal stent.