The No Endosonographic Detection of Tumor (NEST) Study: a Case Series of Pancreatic Cancers Missed on Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Background and Study Aims: The purpose of this study was to identify possible associated factors that may have contributed to failure to detect a pancreatic neoplasm during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examinations by experienced endosonographers.
Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was organized, and 20 cases of pancreatic neoplasms missed by nine experienced endosonographers were identified. Careful analysis of each case was carried out to identify the factors that might have led to the missed diagnosis on EUS.
Results: Twelve patients with a missed pancreatic neoplasm had EUS features of chronic pancreatitis. Other factors that might have increased the likelihood of a false-negative EUS examination included a diffusely infiltrating carcinoma (n = 3), a prominent ventral/dorsal split (n = 2), and a recent episode (within the previous 4 weeks) of acute pancreatitis (n = 1). Five patients with a negative initial EUS underwent a follow-up EUS after 2-3 months, with a pancreatic mass being found in all cases. Three patients had a diffusely infiltrating pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Conclusions: EUS is not a foolproof method of detecting a pancreatic neoplasm. Possible associated factors that may increase the likelihood of a false-negative EUS examination include chronic pancreatitis, a diffusely infiltrating carcinoma, a prominent ventral/dorsal split and a recent episode (< 4 weeks) of acute pancreatitis. If there is a high clinical suspicion of pancreatic neoplasm, if EUS and other imaging methods are negative, and if the patient does not undergo surgery, this study suggests that a repeat EUS after 2-3 months may be useful for detecting an occult pancreatic neoplasm.

References

• 1 Yasuda K, Mukai H, Fugimoto S. et al . The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  34 1-8
• 2 Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 347-352
• 3 Snady H, Cooperman A, Siegel J. Endoscopic ultrasound compared with computed tomography with ERCP in patients with obstructive jaundice or small peri-pancreatic mass.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  38 27-34
• 4 Tio T L, Sie H L, Kallimanis G. et al . Staging of ampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: comparison between endosonography and surgery.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 706-713
• 5 Rösch T, Braig C, Gain T. et al . Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography: comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 188-199
• 6 Vilmann P, Jacobsen G K, Henriksen F W, Hancke S. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 172-173
• 7 Bhutani M S, Hawes R H, Baron P L. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions.  Endoscopy. 1997;  45 474-479
• 8 Wiersema M, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang K. Prospective multicenter evaluation of EUS guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA): diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 432
• 9 Faigel D O, Ginsberg G G, Bentz J S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas in cancer patients with pancreatic lesions.  J Clin Oncol. 1997;  15 1439-1443
• 10 Bhutani M S. Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic diseases: indications, limitations, and the future.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1999;  28 747-770
• 11 Pollack B J, Chak A, Canto M, Sivak M V. The yield of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in abdominal pain of unclear etiology [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 428
• 12 Brugge W R, Lee M J, Kelsey P B. et al . The use of EUS to diagnose malignant portal venous system invasion by pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 561-567
• 13 Natterman C, Goldschmidt A JW, Dancygier H. Endosonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparison between endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 565-570
• 14 Wiersema M J, Hawes R H, Lehman G A. et al . Prospective evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 555-564
• 15 Catalano M F, Lahoti S, Geenen J. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 11-17
• 16 Bhutani M S. Endoscopic ultrasonography: changes of chronic pancreatitis in asymptomatic and symptomatic alcoholic patients.  J Ultrasound Med. 1999;  18 455-462
• 17 Savides T J, Gress F G, Zaidi S A. et al . Detection of embryologic ventral pancreatic parenchyma by endoscopic ultrasound.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  28 273-276
• 18 Mertz H R, Sechopoulos P, Delbeke D, Leach S D. EUS, PET and CT scanning for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 367-371