Endoscopic Suprapapillary Blunt Dissection of the Distal Common Bile Duct in Cases of Difficult Cannulation: A Pilot Series

Background and Study Aims: There is no consensus about the optimal alternative procedure in cases of failed cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD). The alternatives are usually considered to be high-risk procedures. This study describes endoscopic dissection of the distal biliary tract (EDBT) as a new technique in cases of difficult cannulation of the CBD.
Patients and Methods: Out of a total of 1057 patients in whom cannulation was attempted, deep cannulation failed in 49 patients, and 48 of those underwent EDBT. The procedure consists of cutting the mucosa, and the partial isolation of the distal part of the biliary tract using catheters, a needle-knife papillotome, and thin forceps. Access to the biliary tract was achieved with an endoscopic needle or forceps with or without electrocoagulation.
Results: EDBT was successful in all cases. In 46 patients EDBT was followed by standard sphincterotomy. Four patients developed clinical pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia occurred in 11 cases. Perforation, uncontrolled bleeding, and other complications did not occur in this series.
Conclusions: EDBT is feasible, safe and constitutes a potential alternative for cannulation of the CBD. The endoscopic visualization of the wall structure and duodenal layers during the maneuvers at the papilla probably accounts for the absence of major complications.

References

• 1 Schapira L, Khawaja F I. Endoscopic fistulo-sphincterotomy: an alternative method of sphincterotomy using a new sphincterotome.  Endoscopy. 1982;  14 58-60
• 2 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G. et al . Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10
• 3 Baillie J. Needle-knife papillotomy revisited.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 282-284
• 4 Rabenstein T. Benefits ands risks of needle-knife papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 207-221
• 5 Rollhauser C. Needle-knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to ERCP in a selected population.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 691-696
• 6 Farrell R J, Khan M I, Noonan H. et al . Endoscopic papillectomy: a novel approach to difficult cannulation.  Gut. 1996;  39 36-38
• 7 Passi R B, Rankin R N. The transhepatic approach to a failed endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 211-225
• 8 Shorvos P S, Cotton P B, Mason R R. et al . Percutaneous transhepatic assistance for duodenoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gut. 1985;  26 2373-2376
• 9 Adamek H E, Weitz M, Breer H. et al . Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 741-744
• 10 Topazian M, Kozarek R, Stoler R. et al . Clinical utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  43 393-399
• 11 Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I. et al . Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: patient-related and operative risk factors.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 286-292
• 12 Rabenstein T, Hahn E G. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: new momentum.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 325-329
• 13 Dowsett J F, Polydorou A A, Vaira D. et al . Needle-knife papillotomy: how safe and effective?.  Gut. 1990;  31 905-908
• 14 Shakoor T, Geenen J E. Pre-cut papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 623-627
• 15 Siegel H J. Pre-cut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy.  Endoscopy. 1980;  20 130-133
• 16 Siegel H J, Bem-Zsi J S, Pullano W. The needle-knife: a valuable tool in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 499-503
• 17 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
• 18 Vandervoort J, Carr-Locke D L. Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique [editorial]?.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 365-366
• 19 Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux A. et al . Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. results from a single tertiary referral center.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 991-997
• 20 Enns R, Eloubeidi M A, Mergener K. et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 293-297