Zusammenfassung
Säuglinge sind von Geburt an in der Lage, eine Vielzahl sprachlich relevanter lautlicher Eigenschaften wahrzunehmen und zu unterscheiden. Damit bringt das Neugeborene wichtige Voraussetzungen für einen raschen und effizienten Erwerb der Muttersprache mit auf die Welt. Seine hochgradige akustische Sensitivität führt dazu, dass der Säugling bereits in seinen ersten Lebensmonaten sehr spezifische Kenntnisse über die spezielle Art und die spezielle Verteilung von prosodischen und lautlichen Mustern in seiner Muttersprache erwirbt. Dabei baut das Kind nicht nur Wissen über das phonologische System auf, sondern es nutzt das erworbene Wissen auch, um seinen sprachlichen Input in linguistisch relevante Einheiten wie Wörter, Phrasen und Sätze zu gliedern. Das Auffinden solcher Einheiten ist ein wesentlicher Schritt für den Erwerb syntaktischer Eigenschaften der Zielsprache. Auf diese Weise kann das Kind Wissen in einer sprachlichen Domäne nutzen, um Wissen in einer anderen sprachlichen Domäne aufzubauen.
Abstract
There is a lot of evidence that infants are able to perceive and discriminate linguistically relevant features of the speech input from birth on. This ability supports the fast and efficient acquisition of the native language which is typical for the normal course of language learning. Being equipped with these mechanisms the infants acquire knowledge about the specific prosodic and segmental patterns appearing in the native language already during their first months of life. This does not only lead to early knowledge about the phonological system of the language but the infants uses this knowledge for the segmentation of the speech input into linguistically relevant units like words, phrases and sentences. The detection of these units is a relevant basis for the acquisition of syntactic regularities of the native language. This shows that the children have means to bootstrapp from knowledge in one linguistic domain to knowledge in other domains.
Schlüsselwörter
Frühe Sprachperzeption - Segmentierung - Spracherwerbsmechanismus
Key words
Early speech perception - segmentation - bootstrapping mechanismus
Literatur
-
1
Mehler J, Jusczyk P W, Lambertz G, Halsted G, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C.
A precursor of language acquisition in young infants.
Cognition.
1988;
29
143-178
-
2
Nazzi T, Bertoncini J, Mehler J.
Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
1998;
24
756-766
-
3
Christophe A, Nespor M, Guasti M T, Van Ooyen B.
Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: the case of the head-direction parameter.
Developmental Science.
2003;
6
211-220
-
4
Bijeljac-Babic R, Bertoncini J, Mehler J.
How do four-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances.
Developmental Psychology.
1993;
29
711-721
-
5
Bertoncini J, Floccia C, Nazzi T, Mehler J.
Morae and syllables: Rhythmical basis of speech representations in neonates.
Language and Speech.
1995;
38
311-329
-
6
Sansavini A, Bertoncini J, Giovanelli G.
Newborns discriminate stress patterns in phonetically complex Italian words.
Infant Behavior and Development.
1994;
17
924
-
7
Sansavini A, Bertoncini J, Giovanelli G.
Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words.
Developmental Psychology.
1997;
33
3-11
-
8
Christophe A, Dupoux E, Bertoncini J, Mehler J.
Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
1994;
95
1570-1580
-
9
Bertoncini J, Bijeljac-Babic R, Blumstein S E, Mehler J.
Discrimination in neonates of very short CV’s.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
1987;
82
31-37
-
10
Eimas P D.
Auditory and linguistic processing of cues for place of articulation by infants.
Perception and Psychophysics.
1974;
16
513-521
-
11
Jusczyk P W.
Perception of syllable-final stops by two-month-old infants.
Perception & Psychophysics.
1977;
21
450-454
-
12
Jusczyk P W, Thompson E.
Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants.
Perception & Psychophysics.
1978;
23
105-109
-
13
Moffitt A R.
Consonant cue perception by twenty-to-twenty-four-week old infants.
Child Development.
1971;
42
717-731
-
14
Eimas P D.
Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech. Discrimination of the [r-l] distinction by young infants.
Perception and Psychophysics.
1975;
18
341-347
-
15
Eimas P D, Miller J L.
Discrimination of the information for manner of articulation.
Infant Behavior and Development.
1980;
3
367-375
-
16
Jusczyk P W, Copan H, Thompson E.
Perception by two-month-olds of glide contrasts in multisyllabic utterances.
Perception and Psychophysics.
1978;
24
515-520
-
17
Hillenbrand J, Minifie F D, Edwards T.
Tempo of spectrum change as a cue in speech sound discrimination by infants.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.
1979;
22
147-165
-
18
Miller J L, Eimas P D.
Studies on the categorization of speech by infants.
Cognition.
1983;
13
135-165
-
19
Eimas P D, Siqueland E R, Jusczyk P W, Vigorito J.
Speech perception in infants.
Science.
1971;
171
303-306
-
20
Eilers R E.
Context sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
1977;
61
1321-1336
-
21
Eilers R E, Wilson E R, Moore J M.
Developmental changes in speech discrimination in infants.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.
1977;
20
766-780
-
22
Levitt A, Jusczyk P W, Murray J, Carden G.
The perception of place of articulation contrasts in voiced and voiceless fricatives by two-month-old infants.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
1988;
14
361-368
-
23
Trehub S E.
Infants’ sensitivity to vowel and tonal contrasts.
Developmental Psychology.
1973;
9
91-96
-
24
Swoboda P, Morse P A, Leavitt L A.
Continuous vowel discrimination in normal and at-risk infants.
Child Development.
1976;
47
459-465
-
25
Kuhl P K.
Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy.
Infant Behavior and Development.
1983;
6
263-285
-
26
Bertoncini J, Bijeljac-Babic R, Jusczyk P W, Kennedy L J, Mehler J.
An investigation of young infants’ perceptual representations of speech sounds.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
1988;
117
21-33
-
27
Aslin R N, Pisoni D B, Hennessy B L, Perey A J.
Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: New findings and implications for the effects of early experience.
Child Development.
1981;
52
1135-1145
-
28
Werker J, Tees R.
Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life.
Infant Behavior and Development.
1984;
7
49-63
-
29
Polka L, Werker J F.
Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
1994;
20
421-435
-
30
Jusczyk P W, Pisoni D B, Mullennix J.
Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month old infants.
Cognition.
1992;
43
253-291
-
31
Kuhl P K.
Speech perception in early infancy: Perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
1979;
66
1668
-
32
Jusczyk P W, Aslin R N.
Infants’ detection of sound patterns of words in fluent speech.
Cognitive Psychology.
1995;
29
1-23
-
33
Jusczyk P W, Houston D M, Newsome M.
The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants.
Cognitive Psychology.
1999;
39
159-207
-
34
Höhle B, Weissenborn J.
German-learning infants‘ ability to detect unstressed closed-class elements in continuous speech.
Developmental Science.
2003;
6
122-127
-
35
Houston D M, Jusczyk P W.
The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
2000;
26
1570-1582
-
36
Mandel D R, Jusczyk P W, Pisoni D B.
Infants’ recognition of the sound patterns of their own names.
Psychological Science.
1995;
6
315-318
-
37
Moon C, Panneton-Cooper R, Fifer W P.
Two-day-olds prefer their native language.
Infant Behavior and Development.
1993;
16
495-500
-
38 Lecanuet J -P, Granier-Deferre C. Speech stimuli in the fetal environment. In de Boysson-Bardies B, de Schonen S, Jusczyk PW, McNeilage P, Morton J (eds.) Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. Dordrecht; Kluwer 1993
-
39
Werker J F, Gilbert J H, Humphrey K, Tees R C.
Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception.
Child Development.
1981;
52
349-355
-
40
Flege J E.
Chinese subjects’ perception of the word-final English /t/ - /d/ contrast: Before and after training.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
1989;
86
1684-1697
-
41
Logan J S, Lively S E, Pisoni D B.
Training Japanese listeners to identify /r/ and /l/.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
1989;
85
137-138
-
42
Miyawaki K, Strange W, Verbrugge R, Liberman A M, Jenkins J J, Fujimura O.
An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese and English.
Perception and Psychophysics.
1975;
18
331-340
-
43
Lasky R E, Syrdal-Lasky A, Klein R E.
VOT discrimination by four to six and a half month old infants from Spanish environments.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
1975;
20
215-225
-
44
Liberman A M, Cooper D P, Shankweiler D P, Studdert-Kennedy M G.
Perception of the speech code.
Psychological Review.
1967;
74
431-461
-
45
Liberman A M, Harris K H, Kinney J A, Lane H L.
The discrimination of relative-onset time of the components of certain speech and non-speech patterns.
Journal of Experimental Psychology.
1961;
61
379-388
-
46
Streeter L A.
Language perception of 2-month old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience.
Nature.
1976;
259
39-41
-
47
Werker J F, Lalonde C E.
Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change.
Developmental Psychology.
1988;
24
672-683
-
48 Kuhl P K. Innate predispositions and the effects of experience in speech perception: The native language magnet theory. In de Boysson-Bardies B, de Schonen S, Jusczyk PW, McNeilage P, Morton J (eds.) Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. Dordrecht; Kluwer 1993: 259-274
-
49
Kuhl P K, Williams K A, Lacerda F, Stevens K N, Lindblom B.
Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.
Science.
1992;
255
606-608
-
50
Jusczyk P W, Friederici A D, Wessels J, Svenkerud V Y, Jusczyk A M.
Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words.
Journal of Memory and Languge.
1993;
32
402-420
-
51
Friederici A D, Wessels J MI.
Phonotactic knowledge and its use in infant speech perception.
Perception & Psychophysics.
1993;
54
287-295
-
52
Jusczyk P W, Luce P A, Charles-Luce J.
Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language.
Journal of Memory and Language.
1994;
33
630-645
-
53
Morgan J L.
Converging measures of speech segmentation in preverbal infants.
Infant Behavior and Development.
1994;
17
389-403
-
54
Morgan J L.
A rhythmic bias in preverbal speech segmentation.
Journal of Memory and Language.
1996;
35
666-688
-
55
Morgan J L, Saffran J R.
Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation.
Child Development.
1995;
66
911-936
-
56
Echols C H, Crowhurst M J, Childers J B.
The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults.
Journal of Memory and Language.
1997;
36
202-225
-
57 Höhle B, Giesecke D, Jusczyk P W. Word-segmentation in a foreign language: Further evidence for crosslinguistic strategies. Poster, Annual Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Fort Lauderdale; 2001
-
58
Mattys S L, Jusczyk P W, Luce P A, Morgan J L.
Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants.
Cognitive Psychology.
1999;
38
465-494
-
59
Myers J, Jusczyk P W, Kemler Nelson D G, Charles Luce J, Woodward A, Hirsh-Pasek K.
Infants’ sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech.
Journal of Child Language.
1996;
23
1-30
-
60
Church K.
Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval.
Cognition.
1987;
25
53-69
-
61
Hohne E A, Jusczyk P W.
Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to allophonic differences.
Perception and Psychophysics.
1994;
56
613-623
-
62
Jusczyk P W, Hohne E A, Bauman A.
Infants‘ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation.
Perception & Psychophysics.
1999;
61
1465-1476
-
63
Johnson E K, Jusczyk P W.
Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics.
Journal of Memory and Language.
2001;
44
548-567
-
64
Mattys S L, Jusczyk P W.
Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.
Cognition.
2001;
78
91-121
-
65
Saffran J R, Aslin R N, Newport E L.
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.
Science.
1996;
274
1926-1928
-
66
Valian V, Coulson A S.
Anchor points in language learning: The role of marker frequency.
Journal of Memory and Language.
1988;
27
71-86
-
67 Bortfeld H, Rathbun K, Morgan J, Golinkoff R. What’s in a name? Highly familiar items anchor infants‘ segmentation of fluent speech. In Beachley B, Brown A, Conlin, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Sumerville, M.A; Cascadilla Press 2003: 162-172
-
68 Höhle B, Weissenborn J. The origins of syntactic knowledge: Recognition of determiners in one year old German children. In Howell SC, Fish SA, Keith-Lucas, T Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston Conference on Language Development. Sumerville M.A; Cascadilla Press 1999: 418-429
-
69
Hirsh-Pasek K, Kemler Nelson D G, Jusczyk P W, Wright Cassidy K, Druss B, Kennedy L.
Clauses are perceptual units for young infants.
Cognition.
1987;
26
269-286
-
70
Kemler Nelson D G, Hirsh-Pasek K, Jusczyk P W, Wright-Cassidy K.
How prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning.
Journal of Child Language.
1989;
16
55-68
-
71
Jusczyk P W, Hirsh-Pasek K, Kemler Nelson D G, Kennedy L J, Woodward A, Piwoz J.
Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants.
Cognitive Psychology.
1992;
24
252-293
-
72
Nazzi T, Kemler Nelson D G, Jusczyk P W, Jusczyk A M.
Six-month-olds’ detection of clauses embedded in continuous speech: Effects of prosodic well-formedness.
Infancy.
2000;
1
123-147
-
73 Fisher C, Tokura H. Prosody in speech to infants: Direct and indirect acoustic cues to syntactic structure. In Morgan JL, Demuth K (eds.) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Syntax in Early Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J; Erlbaum 1996: 342-363
-
74
Morgan J L, Meier R P, Newport E L.
Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language.
Cognitive Psychology.
1987;
19
498-550
-
75 Blenn L, Seidl A, Höhle B. Recognition of phrases in early language acquisition: The role of morphological markers. In Beachley B, Brown A, Conlin, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Sumerville, M.A; Cascadilla Press 2003: 138-149
Dr. Barbara Höhle
Universität Potsdam
Institut für Linguistik/Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Postfach 601553
14 415 Potsdam
