Download PDF
Semin Hear 2003; 24(4): 355-364
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815547
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Issues in Earmold Fitting and Troubleshooting

Chester Z. Pirzanski
  • Starkey Labs Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

A variety of problems in hearing instrument fittings can be avoided, provided an ear impression is taken properly, the earmold and earshell style and material selected are appropriate, and the earpiece is skillfully manufactured. This article explores issues related to the selection of the otoplastic style and material, the otoplastic fitting technique, and troubleshooting.

KEYWORDS

Otoplastic - acoustic feedback - comfort

REFERENCES

  • 1 Macrae J. Static pressure seal of earmolds.  J Rehab Res Dev . 1990;  4 397-410
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pirzanski C. Variances in the remake rate of earmolds made of hard and soft materials. Internal study, Starkey Canada, 1999
  • 3 Pirzanski C. Critical factors in taking an anatomically accurate impression.  Hear J . 1997;  10 41-48
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Pirzanski C. An alternative impression-taking technique: the open-jaw impression.  Hear J . 1996;  11 30-35
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Oliveira R. The active earcanal.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1997;  8 401-410
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Pirzanski C. Earmolds: are soft materials superior?.  Hear J . 2001;  7 36-42
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Pirzanski C, Chasin M, Klenk M, Purdy J. Attenuation variables in earmolds for hearing protection devices.  Hear J . 2000;  6 44-50
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Maye V. Field return analysis by account. Starkey Labs Canada, Internal study, 1997
  • 9 Pirzanski C. Factors in earmold style selection: starting (and finishing) right.  Hear Rev . 2001;  4 20-24
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kuk F. Maximum usable insertion gain with various earmold configurations.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1994;  5 44-51
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Pirzanski C. The anatomy of perfect ear impression.  Hear Rev . 1998;  12 20-24
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Chasin M, Pirzanski C, Hayes D, Mueller G. The real ear occluded gain as a clinical predictor.  Hear Rev . 1997;  4 22-26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Pirzanski C, Berge B. Ear impressions: art or science?. Audiology online March 18, 2002; http://www.audiologyonline.com