Issues in Earmold Fitting and Troubleshooting

ABSTRACT

A variety of problems in hearing instrument fittings can be avoided, provided an ear impression is taken properly, the earmold and earshell style and material selected are appropriate, and the earpiece is skillfully manufactured. This article explores issues related to the selection of the otoplastic style and material, the otoplastic fitting technique, and troubleshooting.

Otoplastic - acoustic feedback - comfort

REFERENCES

• 1 Macrae J. Static pressure seal of earmolds.  J Rehab Res Dev . 1990;  4 397-410
• 2 Pirzanski C. Variances in the remake rate of earmolds made of hard and soft materials. Internal study, Starkey Canada, 1999
• 3 Pirzanski C. Critical factors in taking an anatomically accurate impression.  Hear J . 1997;  10 41-48
• 4 Pirzanski C. An alternative impression-taking technique: the open-jaw impression.  Hear J . 1996;  11 30-35
• 5 Oliveira R. The active earcanal.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1997;  8 401-410
• 6 Pirzanski C. Earmolds: are soft materials superior?.  Hear J . 2001;  7 36-42
• 7 Pirzanski C, Chasin M, Klenk M, Purdy J. Attenuation variables in earmolds for hearing protection devices.  Hear J . 2000;  6 44-50
• 8 Maye V. Field return analysis by account. Starkey Labs Canada, Internal study, 1997
• 9 Pirzanski C. Factors in earmold style selection: starting (and finishing) right.  Hear Rev . 2001;  4 20-24
• 10 Kuk F. Maximum usable insertion gain with various earmold configurations.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1994;  5 44-51
• 11 Pirzanski C. The anatomy of perfect ear impression.  Hear Rev . 1998;  12 20-24
• 12 Chasin M, Pirzanski C, Hayes D, Mueller G. The real ear occluded gain as a clinical predictor.  Hear Rev . 1997;  4 22-26
• 13 Pirzanski C, Berge B. Ear impressions: art or science?. Audiology online March 18, 2002; http://www.audiologyonline.com