Download PDF
Viszeralchirurgie 2004; 39(02): 69-78
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818768
Originalarbeit

Diagnostik fokaler Leberläsionen: CT, MRT, PET etc.

Diagnostics of Focal Hepatic Lesions: CT, MRI, PET etc.
T Helmberger
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern
,
T F Jakobs
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern
,
R T Hoffmann
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern
,
S O Schönberg
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern
,
M Reiser
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universität München, Klinikum Großhadern
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Fokale Leberläsionen sind unabhängig vom Vorhandensein eines Malignoms ein häufiger Befund. Für ein eventuelles therapeutisches Management ist es dabei erforderlich, die Läsionen eindeutig zu identifizieren und zu charakterisieren. Zur nicht-invasiven Diagnostik stehen die Sonographie, Computertomographie (CT), Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) und nuklearmedizinische Verfahren zur Verfügung. Die modernen chirurgischen wie auch minimalinvasiven ablativen Verfahren erfordern eine hohe diagnostische Präzision, die insbesondere von der CT und MRT gewährleistet wird. Darüber hinaus gewinnt die Positronenemissionstomographie (PET) gerade beim Staging und der Therapiekontrolle zunehmend an Bedeutung, was umso mehr für die kombinierten PET-CT Scanner gilt, die die hohe Sensitivität der PET mit der Ortsauflösung der CT vereinen.

Bei der Abklärung fokaler Leberläsionen müssen neben der Leistungsfähigkeit der einzelnen Untersuchungsmethoden das Spektrum möglicher Läsionen im Kontext der jeweiligen Grunderkrankung des Patienten berücksichtigt werden.

Abstract

Independently from the presence of a malignant disease focal hepatic lesions are a common finding. For a potential therapeutical management it is mandatory to identify and characterize precisely the lesions. For non-invasive diagnostics ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and nuclear scintigraphy are available. Current surgical and minimally invasive ablative techniques necessitate a high diagnostic precision, maintained especially by CT and MRI. Moreover, positron emission tomography (PET) yields increasingly importance mainly in staging and therapy control what is also true for the new combined PET-CT scanners which combine the high sensitivity of PET with the high spatial resolution of CT.

In the work-up of focal hepatic disease the potential of the diverse imaging modalities as well as the spectrum of the various lesions together with the findings of the underlying disease of the patient has to be considered.

Schlüsselwörter

Fokale Leberläsionen - Sonographie - CT - MRT - PET

Key words

Focal hepatic disease - ultrasound - CT - MRI - PET


Publication History

Publication Date:
21 April 2004 (online)

© 2004. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Karhunen PJ. Benign hepatic tumours and tumour like conditions in men.. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39: 183-188
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Jones EC, Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME. The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT.. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 535-539
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hagspiel KD, Neidl KF, Eichenberger AC, Weder W, Marincek B. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US.. Radiology 1995; 196: 471-478
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Fusai G, Davidson BR. Management of colorectal liver metastases.. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 2-23
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Gazelle GS, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM. et al Cost-effectiveness of hepatic metastasectomy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a state-transition Monte Carlo decision analysis.. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 544-555
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Benson 3rd AB, Choti MA, Cohen AM. et al NCCN Practice Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer.. Oncology (Huntingt) 2000; 14: 203-212
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Neumaier CE, Cittadini G, Grasso A, Dahmane M. Role of ultrasonography in the staging of gastrointestinal neoplasms.. Semin Surg Oncol 2001; 20: 86-90
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Glover C, Douse P, Kane P. et al Accuracy of investigations for asymptomatic colorectal liver metastases.. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 476-484
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Delorme S, van Kaick G. [Cui bono? Comments on cost-benefit analysis in ultrasound diagnosis].. Radiologe 1996; 36: 285-291
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Hamm B. [Cost benefit considerations in modern diagnostic sectional imaging exemplified by upper abdominal organs].. Radiologe 1996; 36: 292-299
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Kahn T. [Value of CT and MRI in malignant hepatobiliary tumors].. Zentralbl Chir 2000; 125: 610-615
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Fenchel S, Fleiter TR, Merkle EM. Multislice helical CT of the abdomen.. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (Suppl. 02) S 5-S 10
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M. et al Multiphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver with a multislice CT scanner.. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1085-1094
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Vogl TJ, Schwarz W, Blume S. et al Preoperative evaluation of malignant liver tumors: comparison of unenhanced and SPIO (Resovist)-enhanced MR imaging with biphasic CTAP and intraoperative US.. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 262-272
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Helmberger T, Semelka RC. New contrast agents for imaging the liver.. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9: 745-766
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Semelka RC, Helmberger TK. Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver.. Radiology 2001; 218: 27-38
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Rummeny EJ, Marchal G. Liver imaging. Clinical applications and future perspectives.. Acta Radiol 1997; 38: 626-630
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Helmberger T, Gregor M, Holzknecht N. et al [Effects of biphasic spiral CT, conventional and iron oxide enhanced MRI on therapy and therapy costs in patients with focal liver lesions].. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000; 172: 251-259
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Ward J, Guthrie JA, Wilson D. et al Colorectal hepatic metastases: detection with SPIO-enhanced breath-hold MR imaging - comparison of optimized sequences.. Radiology 2003; 228: 709-718
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Seneterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y. et al Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography.. Radiology 1996; 200: 785-792
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Ward J, Naik KS, Guthrie JA, Wilson D, Robinson PJ. Hepatic lesion detection: Comparison of MR imaging after administration of superparamagnetic Iron Oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.. Radiology 1999; 210: 459-466
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Neumann MC, Schober O. [Nuclear medicine diagnosis of the liver].. Radiologe 2000; 40: 916-924
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Reske SN, Kotzerke J. FDG-PET for clinical use. Results of the 3rd German Interdisciplinary Consensus Conference, “Onko-PET III”, 21 July and 19 September 2000.. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 1707-1723
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M, Warren RS, Thoeni RF. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis.. Radiology 2002; 224: 7487-56
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Balzer JO, Luboldt W, Vogl TJ. [Importance of CT and MRI in the follow-up of patients with rectal cancer].. Radiologe 2003; 43: 122-127
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Trotter JF, Everson GT. Benign focal lesions of the liver.. Clin Liver Dis 2001; 5: 17-42
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Mortele KJ, Ros PR. Benign liver neoplasms.. Clin Liver Dis 2002; 6: 119-145
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Biecker E, Fischer HP, Strunk H, Sauerbruch T. Benign hepatic tumours.. Z Gastroenterol 2003; 41: 191-200
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Jang HJ, Kim TK, Lim HK. et al Hepatic hemangioma: atypical appearances on CT, MR imaging, and sonography.. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 35-141
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Vilgrain V, Uzan F, Brancatelli G. et al Prevalence of hepatic hemangioma in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia: MR imaging analysis.. Radiology 2003; 229: 75-79
    Google Scholar
  • 31 De Rave S, Hussain SM. A liver tumour as an incidental finding: differential diagnosis and treatment.. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2002; 81-86
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Grimm J, Muller-Hulsbeck S, Blume J, Biederer J, Heller M. [Comparison of biphasic spiral CT and MnDPDP-enhanced MRI in the detection and characterization of liver lesions].. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173: 266-272
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Noguchi Y, Murakami T, Kim T. et al Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of dynamic MR imaging with dynamic double arterial phase helical CT.. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 455-460
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Verhoef C, Valkema R, de Man RA, Krenning EP, Yzermans JN. Fluorine-18 FDG imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma using positron coincidence detection and single photon emission computed tomography.. Liver 2002; 22: 51-56
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Yucel C, Ozdemir H, Gurel S, Ozer S, Arac M. Detection and differential diagnosis of hepatic masses using pulse inversion harmonic imaging during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement with Levovist.. J Clin Ultrasound 2002; 30: 203-212
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Schillaci O, Spanu A, Scopinaro F. et al Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in liver metastasis detection from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.. J Nucl Med 2003; 44: 359-368
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Shimada M, Takenaka K, Gion T. et al Treatment strategy for patients with cystic lesions mimicking a liver tumor: a recent 10-year surgical experience in Japan.. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 643-646
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Fusai G, Davidson BR. Strategies to Increase the Resectability of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.. Dig Surg 2003; 20: 481-496
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Muller RD, Vogel K, Neumann K. et al [MRI with supermagnetic iron particles versus double-spiral CT in identification of malignant liver lesions].. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1998; 168: 436-443
    Google Scholar