Laparoskopische Therapie bei chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen profitieren in besonderer Weise von der Reduktion des Zugangstraumas, der schnelleren postoperativen Rekonvaleszenz und der besseren Kosmetik nach laparoskopischen Operationen. Häufigste laparoskopische Operationen sind die Ileozökalresektion und die Stomaanlage bei M. Crohn, die im Vergleich zur offenen Operation keine erhöhten Komplikationsraten aufweisen. Bei der Colitis ulcerosa ist die restaurative Proktokolektomie mit ileumpouchanaler Anastomose (alternativ mit endständiger Ileostomie) die chirurgische Standardtherapie, wobei der zeitliche Mehraufwand bei der laparoskopischen Operation mit dem potenziellen Nutzen für die Patienten korrelieren sollte. Generell bleiben durch den Einsatz der laparoskopischen Chirurgie die OP-Indikationen unberührt, nur der Zugangsweg ändert sich. Es muss jedoch gewährleistet bleiben, dass der laparoskopische Eingriff genauso sicher ist wie die konventionelle Operation - und die Ergebnisse in Zentren laparoskopischer Chirurgie belegen dies.

Abstract

Potential benefits of laparoscopic surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease include reduction of surgical trauma, fast recovery and improved cosmesis when compared to conventional approach. Most common laparoscopic procedures include ileocecal resection and stoma creation for Crohn's disease. Data of comparative studies have shown that laparoscopic resection is not associated with increased morbidity rates. Focussing on ulcerative colitis, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis is the standard therapy for refractory disease. However, the advantages of laparoscopic surgery have to compete with the increased operative times. In general, the indication for surgery has not changed with the application of laparoscopy. It remains a fundamental principle that laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease has to be safe and effective when compared to open surgery, and the published results of specialized centers provide comparable data.

M. Crohn - Colitis ulcerosa - Laparoskopie - Ileozökalresektion - Stomaanlage - Proktokolektomie

Crohn's disease - ulcerative colitis - laparoscopy - ileocecal resection - stoma creation - proctocolectomy

Literatur

• 1 Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius G, Vollmar B, Menger M D. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 242-246
• 2 Kishi D, Nezu R, Ito T, Taniguchi E, Momiyama T, Obunai S, Ohashi S, Matsuda H. Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for Crohn's disease: reduced surgical stress following ileocolectomy.  Surg Today. 2000;  30 219-222
• 3 Dunker M S, Ten Hove T, Bemelman W A, Slors J F, Gouma D J, Van Deventer S J. Interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and expression of human leukocyte antigen-DR on peripheal blood mononuclear cells in patients after laparoscopic vs. conventional bowel resection: a randomised study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1238-1244
• 4 Moorthy K, Shaul T, Foley R J. Factors that predict conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease.  Am J Surg. 2004;  187 47-51
• 5 Chung C C, Tsang W WC, Kwok S Y, Li M KW. Laparoscopy and its current role in the management of colorectal disease.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 528-543
• 6 Msika S, Iannelli A, Deroide G, Jouet P, Soule J C, Kianmanesh R, Perez N, Flamant Y, Fingerhut A, Hay J M. Can laparoscopy reduce hospital stay in the treatment of Crohn's disease?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1661-1666
• 7 Milsom J W, Hammerhofer K A, Boehm B, Marcello P, Elson P, Fazio V W. Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1-8
• 8 Duepree H J, Senagore A J, Delaney C P, Brady K M, Fazio V W. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 605-610
• 9 Diamond I R, Langer J C. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for adolescent Crohn's disease.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;  33 543-547
• 10 Young-Fadok T M, Hall Long K, McConnell E J, Gomez Rey G, Cabanela R L. Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 450-454
• 11 Bemelman W A, Slors J F, Dunker M S, van Hogezand R A, van Deventer S JH, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Gouma D J. Laparoscopic-assisted vs open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. A comparative study.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 721-725
• 12 Alabaz O, Iroatulam A J, Nessim A, Weiss E G, Nogueras J J, Wexner S D. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Eur J Surg. 2000;  166 213-217
• 13 Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Arnaud J -P. Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1129-1133
• 14 Bemoist S, Panis Y, Beaufour A, Bouhnik Y, Matuchansky C, Valleur P. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection in Crohn's disease. A case-matched comparison with open resection.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 814-818
• 15 Shore G, Gonzalez Q H, Bondora A, Vickers S M. Laparoscopic vs conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn's disease.  Arch Surg. 2003;  138 76-79
• 16 Schmidt W U, Mueller F P, Hesterberg R, Roher H D. Laparoskopische Ileostomie und Colostomie bei Crohn-Patienten.  Chirurg. 1996;  67 1261-1265
• 17 Schwandner O, Schiedeck T HK, Bruch H P. Stoma creation for fecal diversion: is the laparoscopic technique appropriate?.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;  13 251-255
• 18 Hildebrandt U, Ecker K W, Feigel G. Minimal-invasive Chirurgie und Morbus Crohn.  Chirurg. 1998;  69 915-921
• 19 Evans J, Poritz L, MacRae H. Influence of experience on laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1595-1600
• 20 Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto S, Hibi T, Kitajima M. Successful application of laparoscopic surgery to the treatment of Crohn's disease with fistulas.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1057-1061
• 21 Dunker M S, Bemelman W a, Slors J FM, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma D J. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1800-1807
• 22 Hashimoto A, Funayama Y, Naito H, Fukushima K, Shibata C, Naitoh T, Shibuya K, Koyama K, Takahashi K-I, Ogawa H, Satoh S, Ueno T, Kitayama T, Matsuno S, Sasaki I. Laparoscope-assisted versus conventional restorative proctocolectomy with rectal mucosectomy.  Surg Today. 2001;  31 210-214
• 23 Kienle P, Weitz J, Benner A, Herfarth C, Schmidt J. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 716-720
• 24 Marcello P W, Milsom P W, Wong S K, Brady K, Goormastic M, Fazio V W. Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;  44 1441-1445
• 25 Proctor M L, Langer J C, Gerstle J T, Kim P C. Is laparoscopic subtotal colectomy better than open subtotal colectomy in children?.  J Pediatr Surg. 2002;  37 706-708
• 26 Ky A J, Sonoda T, Milsom J W. One-stage laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: an alternative to the conventional approach?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 207-210
• 27 Bell R L, Seymour N E. Laparoscopic treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  12 1778-1782
• 28 Dunker M S, Bemelman W A, Slors J F, van Hogezand R A, Ringers J, Gouma D J. Laparoscopic-assisted vs open colectomy for severe acute colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a retrospective study in 42 patients.  Surg Endosc. 2000;  14 911-914