Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Bile Duct Lesions

Background and Study Aims: It is still difficult to differentiate reliably between benign and malignant biliary tract lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has added to the diagnostic power of EUS for other gastrointestinal tumors. A retrospective analysis of experience with FNA sampling of bile duct lesions was therefore carried out.
Patients and Methods: All EUS-FNA procedures for bile duct masses or strictures were analyzed at our tertiary referral center from May 2000 through October 2002. Data for EUS findings, the results of EUS-FNA, and tissue sampling at surgery were included. EUS-FNA procedures were carried out using a 22-gauge needle. An experienced cytopathologist was present during FNA in all but three cases. Clinical follow-up details were recorded when available for patients in whom a suitable diagnostic gold standard was not available for comparison.
Results: A total of 35 patients underwent EUS-FNA of bile duct lesions during the study period. There were no complications. Data for EUS-FNA of bile duct masses or strictures and tissue obtained at surgery were available for 23 patients. If positive cytology at surgical pathology is taken as the gold standard, EUS-FNA has a diagnostic yield for cancer of 100 % (if atypia/inconclusive findings in the FNA sample are regarded as benign). Eleven patients had a definite malignancy on surgical pathology. Of these 11 patients, five had a finding of malignancy on EUS-FNA, giving a sensitivity of 45 % (if FNA cytology reported as atypia/inconclusive is regarded as benign). Twelve patients had findings of no malignancy from tissue obtained at surgery. Of these 12 patients, nine had benign pathology and three had atypia/inconclusive findings in the EUS-FNA sample (specificity of 100 % if atypia/inconclusive findings are considered benign). A further 12 patients did not have surgical specimens for comparison with EUS-FNA results. Four patients had definite findings of malignancy on EUS-FNA alone, and one patient had FNA findings suspicious for malignancy. Seven patients had negative or equivocal EUS-FNA results. These 12 patients are described but excluded from further analysis, as a gold standard was not available for comparison. However, clinical follow-up data were available for eight of these 12 patients, and in each case the follow-up findings were compatible with previous benign or malignant EUS-FNA findings.
Conclusions: The practice of EUS-FNA has improved the diagnostic yield of EUS. These results suggest that it is a safe and useful procedure for investigating biliary masses or strictures that have hitherto caused considerable diagnostic confusion, especially in patients with negative brush cytology findings. The possibility of false-negative findings remains, but core biopsy needles may improve the situation. The results of further studies are awaited.

References

• 1 Brugge W R. Endoscopic ultrasonography: the current status.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  115 1577-1583
• 2 Byrne M F, Jowell P S. Gastrointestinal imaging: endoscopic ultrasound.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  122 1631-1648
• 3 Tio T L, Cheng J, Wijers O B. et al . Endosonographic TNM staging of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: comparison with pathological staging.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  100 1351-1361
• 4 Gress F G, Hawes R H, Savides T J. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 243-250
• 5 Giovannini M, Seitz J F, Monges G. et al . Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 171-177
• 6 Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering D C, Sriram P V. et al . EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case series.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 534-540
• 7 Nix G A, van Overbeeke I C, Wilson J H. et al . ERCP diagnosis of tumors in the region of the head of the pancreas: analysis of criteria and computer-aided diagnosis.  Dig Dis Sci. 1988;  33 577-586
• 8 Mansfield J C, Griffin S M, Wadehra V. et al . A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures.  Gut. 1997;  40 671-677
• 9 Desa L A, Akosa A B, Lazzara S. et al . Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture.  Gut. 1991;  32 1188-1191
• 10 Fogel E L, Sherman S. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 758-760
• 11 Kurzawinski T R, Deery A, Dooley J S. et al . A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.  Hepatology. 1993;  18 1399-1403
• 12 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Wada N. et al . Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy without sphincterotomy for diagnosing biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study with bile and brush cytology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 465-467
• 13 Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F. et al . Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 565-572
• 14 Lee J G, Leung J W, Baillie J. et al . Benign, dysplastic, or malignant - making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 722-726
• 15 Pugliese V, Conio M, Nicolo G. et al . Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 520-526
• 16 Venu R P, Geenen J E, Kini M. et al . Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology: a new technique.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  99 1475-1479
• 17 Howell D A, Beveridge R P, Bosco J. et al . Endoscopic needle aspiration biopsy at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 531-535
• 18 Foutch P G, Kerr D M, Harlan J R. et al . Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 791-795
• 19 Ferrari A P Jr, Lichtenstein D R, Slivka A. et al . Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 140-145
• 20 Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck W. et al . Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 712-717
• 21 Scudera P L, Koizumi J, Jacobson I M. Brush cytology evaluation of lesions encountered during ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 281-284
• 22 Jailwala J, Sherman S, Gottlieb K. et al . Yield of ERCP tissue sampling of malignant biliary strictures by brush, forceps, and needle aspiration methods [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 384
• 23 Lo S K, Cox J, Soltani S. A prospective blinded evaluation of all ERCP sampling methods on biliary strictures [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 386
• 24 Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F. et al . Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;  32 363-368
• 25 Kubota Y, Takaoka M, Tani K. et al . Endoscopic transpapillary biopsy for diagnosis of patients with pancreaticobiliary ductal strictures.  Am J Gastroenterol.. 1993;  88 1700-1704
• 26 Jailwala J, Fogel E L, Sherman S. et al . Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 383-390
• 27 Farrell R J, Jain A K, Brandwein S L. et al . The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 587-594
• 28 Mukai H, Yasuda K, Nakajima M. Tumors of the papilla and distal common bile duct: diagnosis and staging by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;  5 763-772
• 29 Nakazawa S. Recent advances in endoscopic ultrasonography.  J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 257-260
• 30 Williams D B, Sahai A V, Aabakken L. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience.  Gut. 1999;  44 720-726
• 31 Wiersema M J, Vilmann P, Giovannini M. et al . Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 1087-1095
• 32 Harewood G C, Wiersema M J. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1386-1391
• 33 Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer.  Ann Intern Med. 2001;  134 459-464
• 34 Ylagan L R, Edmundowicz S, Kasal K. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic carcinoma: a 3-year experience and review of the literature.  Cancer. 2002;  96 362-369
• 35 Domagk D, Poremba C, Dietl K H. et al . Endoscopic transpapillary biopsies and intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnostics of bile duct strictures: a prospective study.  Gut. 2002;  51 240-244
• 36 Menzel J, Poremba C, Dietl K H. et al . Preoperative diagnosis of bile duct strictures: comparison of intraductal ultrasonography with conventional endosonography.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 77-82
• 37 Tamada K, Ueno N, Tomiyama T. et al . Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 341-349