Attempted Endoscopic En Bloc Resection of Mucosal and Submucosal Tumors Using Insulated-Tip Knives: A Pilot Series (including videos)

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early gastrointestinal cancers has been shown to be effective in treating mucosal malignancies, but en bloc resection (where the entire tumor is removed in one piece) is often not achieved using conventional cap EMR. Other techniques, developed in Japan, include the application of different types of knife such as the insulated-tip instrument. We report our preliminary experience of the use of this knife, in conjunction with other techniques, in attempting en bloc resection of early mucosal cancers and adenomas and in the removal of submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Patients and Methods: A total of 37 patients (26 men, 11 women, age range 53 - 86) were included in the study; 23 patients had 24 mucosal lesions amenable to EMR, and 14 patients had SMTs shown on endosonography to spare the muscularis propria. Lesions were located in the esophagus (n = 13), the stomach (n = 24), and the duodenum (n = 1); 40 % of the mucosal lesions were 20 mm or larger (mean size 18mm), whereas the mean size of the submucosal lesions was 23 mm. After submucosal saline injection, circumcision and dissection of the mucosal lesions was attempted with the aim of achieving en bloc resection. For SMTs, cap mucosectomy of the overlying mucosa was done first, and the tumors were then freed using saline injection, and finally resected using snare polypectomy. Results: The strict aim of the study, i. e. complete tumor removal in a single piece, was achieved in only 25 % of the mucosal lesions (some failures were due to unrecognized submucosal infiltration) and 36 % of the SMTs. When a more liberal definition of success was assumed, this rate increased to 65 % for mucosal lesions (piecemeal, no tumor found at surgery or follow-up endoscopy with biopsy) and 79 % for SMTs (piecemeal). No severe complications necessitating surgery or leading to major morbidity occurred. However, clinically significant complications were found in six patients (minor perforation managed conservatively (n = 1), severe pain without perforation (n = 1), bleeding requiring reintervention (n = 3), and aspiration (n = 1)). Conclusions: Although we are convinced that methods of achieving en bloc resection of mucosal cancers and SMTs must be pursued, the insulated-tip knife in conjunction with conventional endoscopes still has limitations. Innovative endoscope design (double-channel scopes) as well as the development of new accessories will help to overcome the current limitations and further promote endoscopic tumor resection.

References

• 1 Kojima T, Parra-Blanco A, Takahashi H. et al . Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: Review of the Japanese literature.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;  48 550-554
• 2 Rembacken B J, Gotoda T, Fujii T. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 709-718
• 3 Tani M, Sakai P, Kondo H. Endoscopic muco resection of superficial cancer in the stomach using the cap technique.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 348-355
• 4 May A, Gossner L, Pech O. et al . Intraepithelial high-grade neoplasia and early adenocarcinoma in short-segment Barrett’s esophagus (SSBE): curative treatment using local endoscopic treatment techniques.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 604-610
• 5 Ell C, May A, Gossner L. et al . Endoscopic mucosection of early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 670-677
• 6 Ahmad N A, Kochman M L, Long W B. et al . Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 390-396
• 7 Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Mitomi H. et al . Clinical outcome of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy for early stage gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 708-713
• 8 Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer.  Gut. 2001;  48 225-229
• 9 Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H. et al . A novel endoscopic mucosal resection technique for early gastric cancer: submucosal dissection method with an insulation-tipped (IT) knife [abstract].  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 Suppl II A43
• 10 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al . Successful en bloc resection of large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodium hyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 690-694
• 11 Miyashita M, Tajiri T, Maruyama H. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection scissors for the treatment of early gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 611-612
• 12 Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y. et al . A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 576-581
• 13  . World Health Organization .Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA (eds) Classification of Tumours. Lyon; IARC Press 2000
• 14 Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M. et al . Long-term outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or deeper.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 387-390
• 15 Waxman I, Saitoh Y. Clinical outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial GI lesions and the role of high-frequency US probe sonography in an American population.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 322-327
• 16 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al . Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 507-512
• 17 Chandu de Silva M V, Reid R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): C-kit mutations, CD117 expression, differential diagnosis and targeted cancer therapy with imatinib.  Pathol Oncol Res. 2003;  9 13-19
• 18 Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y. et al . The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 37-43
• 19 Hunt G C, Rader A E, Faigel D O. A comparison of features between CD-117 positive GI stromal tumors and CD-117 negative spindle cell tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 469-474
• 20 Hyun J H, Jeen Y T, Chun H J. et al . Endoscopic resection of submucosal tumor of the esophagus: results in 62 patients.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 165-170
• 21 Kojima T, Takahashi H, Parra-Blanco A. et al . Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 516-522
• 22 Sun S, Wang M. Use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided injection in endoscopic resection of solid submucosal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 82-85
• 23 Ludwig K, Wilhelm L, Scharlau U. et al . Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous resection of gastric tumors.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1561-1565
• 24 Walsh R M, Ponsky J, Brody F. et al . Combined endoscopic/laparoscopic intragastric resection of gastric stromal tumors.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;  7 386-392

1 Video 1 Use of the insulated-tip knife in the case shown in Figure 6, for the dissection of the mucosal lesion from the underlying muscularis, in retroversion.

1 Video 2 The same same case as in video [V1] during the same session: here the dissection is beeing done in a prograde fashion.