The Rate of Lesions Found within Reach of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy during Push Enteroscopy Depends on the Type of Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Background and Study Aims: Many lesions found during push enteroscopy to evaluate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding are within the reach of standard endoscopes. The aim of this study was to determine whether the rate of proximal lesions varies in relation to the type of obscure bleeding that is present.
Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive push enteroscopies carried out for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding between July 1996 and July 2000 was conducted. The patients were categorized into three groups: those with recurrent obscure/overt gastrointestinal bleeding; those with persistent obscure/overt gastrointestinal bleeding; and those with obscure/occult gastrointestinal bleeding.
Results: A total of 63 patients (24 men, 39 women; mean age 69.8) were included. Push enteroscopy examinations were conducted for recurrent obscure/overt bleeding in 32 patients; for persistent obscure/overt bleeding in 12 patients; and for obscure/occult bleeding in 19 patients. The overall diagnostic yield of push enteroscopy was 47 % (15 of 32) in the group with recurrent obscure/overt bleeding; 66 % (eight of 12) in the group with persistent obscure/overt bleeding; and 63 % (12 of 19) in the group with obscure/occult bleeding. However, when lesions within the reach of standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were excluded, the yield of push enteroscopy was slightly higher in the group with recurrent obscure/overt bleeding (41 %) than in the groups with persistent obscure/overt bleeding (33 %) and obscure/occult bleeding (26 %). There were fewer lesions within the reach of EGD in the group with recurrent obscure/overt bleeding than in the groups with persistent obscure/overt bleeding (6 % vs. 33 %; P < 0.05) or obscure/occult bleeding (6 % vs. 37 %; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing push enteroscopy for recurrent obscure/overt bleeding were significantly less likely to have lesions within the reach of EGD than patients with persistent obscure/overt bleeding or obscure/occult bleeding. Patients in the latter two groups would be able to undergo a repeat EGD examination before more intense evaluation with push enteroscopy or capsule endoscopy.

References

• 1 Sharma B C, Bhasin D K, Makharia G. et al . Diagnostic value of push-type enteroscopy: a report from India.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 137-140
• 2 Landi B, Tkoub M, Gaudric M. et al . Diagnostic yield of push-type enteroscopy in relation to indication.  Gut. 1998;  42 421-425
• 3 Vakil N, Huilgol V, Khan I. Effect of push enteroscopy on transfusion requirements and quality of life in patients with unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 425-428
• 4 Adrain A L, Krevsky B. Enteroscopy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin.  Dig Dis. 1996;  14 345-355
• 5 Davies G R, Benson M J, Gertner D J. et al . Diagnostic and therapeutic push type enteroscopy in clinical use.  Gut. 1995;  37 346-352
• 6 Chak A, Koehler M K, Sundaram S N. et al . Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of push enteroscopy: analysis of factors associated with positive findings.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 18-22
• 7 Zwas F R, Bonheim N A, Berken C A, Gray S. Diagnostic yield of routine ileoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;  90 1441-1443
• 8 Appleyard M, Fireman Z, Glukhovsky A. et al . A randomized trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy for the detection of small-bowel lesions.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  119 1431-1438
• 9 Lewis B S, Swain P. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: results of a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 349-353
• 10 Zaman A, Katon R M. Push enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding yields a high incidence of proximal lesions within reach of a standard endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 372-376
• 11 Zuckerman G R, Prakash C, Askin M P, Lewis B S. AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 201-221
• 12 Lewis B S, Kornbluth A, Waye J D. Small bowel tumours: yield of enteroscopy.  Gut. 1991;  32 763-765
• 13 Descamps C, Schmit A, Van Gossum A. ”Missed” upper gastrointestinal tract lesions may explain ”occult” bleeding.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 452-455
• 14 Pennazio M, Arrigoni A, Risio M. et al . Clinical evaluation of push-type enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 164-170
• 15 Lewis B S, Wenger J S, Waye J D. Small bowel enteroscopy and intraoperative enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 171-174
• 16 Waye J D. Small-intestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 24-30
• 17 Bowden T A, Jr, Hooks V H III, Mansberger A R, Jr. Intraoperative gastrointestinal endoscopy in the management of occult gastrointestinal bleeding.  South Med J. 1979;  72 1532-1534
• 18 Schmit A, Gay F, Adler M. et al . Diagnostic efficacy of push-enteroscopy and long-term follow-up of patients with small bowel angiodysplasias.  Dig Dis Sci. 1996;  41 2348-2352
• 19 Rossini F P, Pennazio M. Small-bowel endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 13-20
• 20 Askin M P, Lewis B S. Push enteroscopic cauterization: long-term follow-up of 83 patients with bleeding small intestinal angiodysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 580-583
• 21 Van Gossum A, Hittelet A, Schmit A. et al . A prospective comparative study of push and wireless-capsule enteroscopy in patients with obscure digestive bleeding.  Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2003;  66 199-205
• 22 Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gut. 2003;  52 1122-1126
• 23 Hartmann D, Schilling D, Bolz G. et al . Capsule endoscopy versus push enteroscopy in patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 377-382
• 24 Costamagna G, Shah S K, Riccioni M E. et al . A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  123 999-1005
• 25 Adler D G, Knipschield M, Gostout C. A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 492-498
• 26 Landi B, Cellier C, Fayemendi L. et al . Duodenal perforation occurring during push enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 631
• 27 Yang R, Laine L. Mucosal stripping: a complication of push enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 156-158
• 28 Chong J, Tagle M, Barkin J S, Reiner D K. Small bowel push-type fiberoptic enteroscopy for patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding or suspected small bowel pathology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 2143-2146
• 29 Lewis B S, Kornbluth A, Waye J D. Small bowel tumours: yield of enteroscopy.  Gut. 1991;  32 763-765
• 30 Brandt L J, Mukhopadhyay D. Masking of colon vascular ectasias by cold water lavage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 141-142