Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-828608
Uterine Rupture in Patients with a Prior Cesarean Delivery: The Impact of Cervical Ripening
Publication History
Publication Date:
28 May 2004 (online)
The purpose of this study was to examine factors that were associated with uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. We analyzed the results of all patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery between September 1996 to December 1999 at a single institution using a contemporaneously maintained registry. Maternal factors, fetal factors, and management of labor were all assessed to determine the risk factors associated with symptomatic uterine rupture at the time of attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Twenty-eight symptomatic ruptures were identified in 972 attempts of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at a gestational age greater than 24 weeks (2.88%). The use of preinduction cervical ripening was significantly associated with an increased risk of symptomatic uterine rupture (odds ratio, 3.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.78 to 8.62). Patients who underwent preinduction cervical ripening were significantly less likely to delivery vaginally than women who had not (46.71 versus 76.87%; p < 0.001). No other differences were noted between the two groups. Preinduction cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
KEYWORDS
Uterine rupture - vaginal birth after cesarean delivery - cervical ripening - induction
REFERENCES
- 1 McMahon M J et al.. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335 689-695
- 2 Flamm B L et al.. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83 927-932
- 3 Jones R O et al.. Rupture of low transverse cesarean scars during trial of labor [see comments]. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77 815-817
- 4 Scott J R. Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: an alternative viewpoint [see comments]. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77 811-814
- 5 Approach VBAC deliveries cautiously, experts say. Hosp Peer Rev. 1998; 23 189
- 6 Sciscione A C et al.. Uterine rupture during preinduction cervical ripening with misoprostol in a patient with a previous caesarean delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 38 96-97
- 7 Wing D A, Lovett K, Paul R H. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91 828-830
- 8 Hawe J A, Olah K S. Posterior uterine rupture in a patient with a lower segment caesarean section scar complicating prostaglandin induction of labor [see comments]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104 857-858
- 9 Bennett B B. Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(5 pt 2) 832-833
- 10 Zelop C M et al.. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181 882-886
- 11 Sciscione A C et al.. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180 55-60
- 12 Flamm B L. Once a cesarean always a controversy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90 312-315
- 13 Naef III R F et al.. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172 1666-1674
- 14 Swaim L S, Holste C S, Waller D K. Umbilical cord blood pH after prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92 390-393
- 15 Plauche W C, Von Almen W, Muller R. Catastrophic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 64 792-797
- 16 Socol M L, Peaceman A M. Vaginal birth after cesarean: an appraisal of fetal risk. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93 674-679
- 17 MacKenzie I Z, Bradley S, Embrey M P. Vaginal prostaglandins and labour induction for patients previously delivered by caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984; 91 7-10
- 18 Blanco J D et al.. Prostaglandin E2 gel induction of patients with a prior low transverse cesarean section. Am J Perinatol. 1992; 9 80-83
- 19 Turner J E et al.. Prostaglandin E2 in tylose gel for cervical ripening before induction of labor. J Reprod Med. 1987; 32 815-821
- 20 Goldberger S B et al.. The use of PGE2 for induction of labor in parturients with a previous cesarean section scar. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989; 68 523-526
- 21 Flamm B L et al.. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol. 1997; 14 157-160
- 22 Ravasia D J, Wood S L, Pollard J K. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183 1176-1179
- 23 Plaut M M, Schwartz M L, Lubarsky S L. Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180 1535-1542
- 24 Hofmeyr G J, Gulmezoglu A M, Alfirevic Z. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106 798-803
- 25 Leung A S et al.. Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168 1358-1363
- 26 Rosen M G, Dickinson J C, Westhoff C L. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77 465-470
- 27 Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton E F, Harel F, Gauthier R J. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186 1326-1330
Matthew K HoffmanM.D. M.P.H.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health Services
4755 Ogletown-Stanton Road
Newark, DE 19718