RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829023
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Prognose des hepatozellulären Karzinoms nach neuen Stadieneinteilungen
Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma according to new staging systemsPublikationsverlauf
eingereicht: 21.5.2003
akzeptiert: 29.4.2004
Publikationsdatum:
05. August 2004 (online)
Hintergrund und Fragestellung: In dieser Studie untersuchten wir die prognostischen Faktoren und das Überleben von Patienten mit hepatozellulärem Karzinom (HCC) in Norddeutschland. Dabei wurden die etablierten Staging-Systeme wie die Child-Pugh-, Okuda- und UICC-Klassifikation mit den neuen Scores aus Italien (CLIP) und Spanien (BCLC) verglichen.
Patienten und Methoden: In einer retrospektiven Studie untersuchten wir den Verlauf von 62 konsekutiven Patienten (34-82 Jahre, 48 männlich, 14 weiblich), bei denen an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im Zeitraum von Oktober 1996 bis September 1998 ein hepatozelluläres Karzinom diagnostiziert wurde. Die Patienten wurden nach der Child-Pugh-, UICC-, Okuda-, CLIP- und BCLC-Klassifikation eingeteilt und bis zum 31.12.2001 nachbeobachtet.
Ergebnisse: Das mediane Überleben der Patienten lag bei 11,3 (1 - 59,5) Monaten. In der univariaten Analyse (Logrank-Test) waren fortgeschrittene Stadien der Okuda-, UICC-, CLIP- und BCLC-Klassifikation jeweils mit einer signifikant schlechteren Prognose verbunden, nicht jedoch bei der Child-Pugh-Klassifikation. In der multivariaten Analyse nach dem Cox-Regressionsmodell zeigten sich die CLIP-Klassifikation, die UICC-Klassifikation sowie eine chronische Hepatitis-B-Infektion als unabhängige Prognosefaktoren.
Folgerung: Die UICC- und die CLIP-Klassifikationen konnten die Patienten mit der besten Prognose identifizieren und waren in der multivariaten Analyse ein unabhängiger Faktor.
Background and objective: We investigated prognostic factors and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in North-Germany. Established staging systems (Child-Pugh, Okuda and UICC classification) were compared with new prognostic scores from Italy (CLIP) and Spain (BCLC).
Patients and methods: The clinical course of 62 consecutive patients (34-82 years, 48 males, 14 females) with HCC observed in the Medical School of Hannover from October 1996 to September 1998 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified according to the staging systems of Child Pugh, Okuda, UICC, CLIP and BCLC. Follow-up ended on December 31st 2001.
Results: Overall median survival was 11,3 (1 - 59,5) months. At univariate analysis (log-rank test) Okuda, UICC, CLIP and BCLC Score were each associated with a shorter survival. In contrast Child Pugh score provided no significant prognostication. By multiple regression analysis (Cox regression analysis), only the CLIP and UICC score and chronic hepatitis B infection were shown to be independent risk factors.
Conclusion: Our investigations indicate, that the CLIP and UICC classifications identified those patients with the best prognosis and they, as well as chronic hepatitis C, were shown to be independent risk factors.
Literatur
- 1 Bosch F X, Ribes J, Borras J. Epidemiology of primary liver cancer. Semin Liver Dis. 1999; 19 271-285
- 2 Chevret S, Trinchet J C, Mathieu D, Rached A A, Beaugrand M, Chastang C. A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Groupe d’Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hepatocellulaire. J Hepatol. 1999; 31 133-141
- 3 Child C G, Turcotte J G. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964; 1 1-85
- 4 Cox D R. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972; 34 187-220
- 5 El Serag H B, Mason A C. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340 745-750
- 6 Farinati F, Rinaldi M, Gianni S, Naccarato R. How should patients with hepatocellular carcinoma be staged? Validation of a new prognostic system. Cancer. 2000; 89 2266-2273
- 7 Giannelli G, Pierri F, Trerotoli P. et al . Occurrence of portal vein tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma affects prognosis and survival. A retrospective clinical study of 150 cases. Hepatol Res. 2002; 24 50
- 8 Gibson J B, Sobin L H. Histological typing of tumours of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas. International Histological Classification of Tumours. Geneva, World Health Organization 1978: 20-25
- 9 Hermanek P, Sobin L H. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, International Union Against Cancer. 4th edn Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 1992: 153-157
- 10 Herold C, Reck T, Fischler P. et al . Prognosis of a large cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a single European centre. Liver. 2002; 22 23-28
- 11 Kashala L O, Conne B, Kalengayi M M, Kapanci Y, Frei P C, Lambert P H. Histopathologic features of hepatocellular carcinoma in Zaire. Cancer. 1990; 65 130-13 4
- 12 Kondo Y. Histologic features of hepatocellular carcinoma and allied disorders. Pathol Annu. 1985; 20 405-430
- 13 Kubicka S, Rudolph K L, Hanke M. et al . Hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany: a retrospective epidemiological study from a low-endemic area. Liver. 2000; 20 312-318
- 14 Kubicka S, Rudolph L, Manns M P. Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis and multi-modality therapy. Internist. 1997; 38 954-962
- 15 Levy I, Sherman M. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the CLIP, Okuda, and Child-Pugh staging systems in a cohort of 257 patients in Toronto. Gut. 2002; 50 881-885
- 16 Lin D Y, Liaw Y F, Chu C M. et al . Hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic patients. A laparoscopic study of 92 cases in Taiwan. Cancer. 1984; 54 1466-1468
- 17 Llovet J M, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999; 19 329-338
- 18 Maestranzi S, Przemioslo R, Mitchell H, Sherwood R A. The effect of benign and malignant liver disease on the tumour markers CA19 - 9 and CEA. Ann Clin Biochem. 1998; 35 99-103
- 19 Nzeako U C, Goodman Z D, Ishak K G. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers: A clinico-histopathologic study of 804 North American patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996; 105 65-75
- 20 Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H. et al . Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients. Cancer. 1985; 56 918-928
- 21 Pugh R N, Murray-Lyon I M, Dawson J L. et al . Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973; 60 646-649
- 22 Schoniger-Hekele M, Muller C, Kutilek M. et al . Hepatocellular carcinoma in Austria: aetiological and clinical characteristics at presentation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000; 12 941-948
- 23 Smalley S R, Moertel C G, Hilton J F. et al . Hepatoma in the noncirrhotic liver. Cancer. 1988; 62 1414-1424
- 24 Sorensen J B, Klee M, Palshof T, Hansen H H. Performance status assessment in cancer patients: An inter-observer variability study. Br J Cancer. 1993; 67 773-775
- 25 Takano S, Watanabe Y, Ohishi H. et al . Multimodality treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single institution retrospective series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000; 26 67-72
- 26 The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators . A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients. Hepatology. 1998; 28 751-755
- 27 The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators . Prospective validation of the CLIP score: a new prognostic system for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2000; 31 840-845
- 28 Tsukuma H, Hiyama T, Tanaka S. et al . Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328 1797-1801
- 29 Zaman S N, Melia W M, Johnson R D. et al . Risk factors in development of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: prospective study of 613 patients. Lancet. 1985; 1 1357-1360
- 30 Zhao W H, Ma Z M, Zhou X R, Feng Y Z, Fang B S. Prediction of recurrence and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection by use of CLIP score. World J Gastroenterol. 2002; 8 237-242
Dr. Martin Caselitz
Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Deggendorf
Perlasberger Straße 41
94469 Deggendorf
Telefon: 0991/3803231
Fax: 0991/3803248
eMail: Martin.Caselitz@klinikum-deggendorf.de