References
1
Tilstam U.
Weinmann H.
Org. Process Res. Dev.
2002,
6:
384
2
Ura Y.
Sakata G.
Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
6th ed.:
Wiley-VCH;
Weinheim:
2001.
3
Ziegler K.
Spath A.
Schaaf E.
Schumann W.
Winkelmann E.
Anal. Chem.
1942,
551:
80
4
Newkome GR.
Kiefer GE.
Xia YJ.
Gupta VK.
Synthesis
1984,
676
5a
Firouzabadi H.
Iranpoor N.
Hazarkhani H.
Synlett
2001,
1641
5b
Zolfigol MA.
Choghamarani AG.
Hazarkhani H.
Synlett
2002,
1002
5c
Zolfigol MA.
Madrakian E.
Ghaemi E.
Mallakpour S.
Synlett
2003,
1633
5d
Zolfigol MA.
Ghaemi E.
Madrakian E.
Synlett
2003,
191
5e
Zolfigol MA.
Madrakian E.
Ghaemi E.
Mallakpour S.
Synlett
2003,
2222
5f
Mendonça GF.
Sanseverino AM.
de Mattos MCS.
Synthesis
2003,
45
6a
Falorni M.
Porcheddu A.
Taddei M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1999,
40:
4395
6b
Falorni M.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
Taddei M.
J. Org. Chem.
1999,
64:
8962
6c
Falchi A.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
Taddei M.
Synlett
2000,
275
6d
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Taddei M.
J. Org. Chem.
2001,
66:
2534
6e
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
Org. Lett.
2001,
3:
1519
6f
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
Org. Lett.
2002,
4:
553
6g
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
J. Org. Chem.
2002,
67:
5152
6h
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
J. Org. Chem.
2002,
67:
6272
6i
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
Salaris M.
Org. Lett.
2003,
5:
2715
7
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Porcheddu A.
Org. Lett.
2001,
3:
3041
8
De Luca L.
Giacomelli G.
Masala S.
Porcheddu A.
J. Org. Chem.
2003,
68:
4999
9
Chen F.
Kuang Y.
Dai H.
Lu L.
Huo M.
Synthesis
2003,
2629
10 These results are obviously inconsistent with those published (ref.9). We have repeated the experiments with other substrates, such as those reported in Table 1, following the reported procedure and always no traces of nitriles were detected. We have no explanation for this disagreement: in our opinion, this might perhaps depend on the distillation procedure adopted from the above-cited authors that should have caused hydrochloride elimination from the substrate.
11
Wright GF.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1948,
70:
1958
12 The reaction is not chemoselective: a mixture of primary and secondary amines yielded a mixture of chloroamines when reacted with 1 equiv of TCCA.
13
Tilstam U.
Harre M.
Heckrodt T.
Weinmann H.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2001,
42:
5385
14
Bachmann WE.
Cava MP.
Dreiding AS.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1954,
76:
5554
15 Probably owing to the formation of insoluble salts formed by TEA and the formed trihydroxytriazine.
16 The presence of the compounds in the reaction mixture was evidenced by 1H NMR analysis.
17a
Schönberg A.
Moubacher R.
Chem. Rev.
1952,
50:
261
17b
Clarke TG.
Hampson NA.
Lee JB.
Morley JR.
Scanlon B.
J. Chem. Soc. C
1970,
815 ; and references therein
18
Rozen S.
Bar-Haim A.
Mishani E.
J. Org. Chem.
1994,
59:
1208 ; and references therein
19a
Friedman AH.
Morgulis S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1936,
58:
909
19b
McGregor WH.
Carpenter FH.
Biochemistry
1962,
1:
53
19c
Gowda BT.
Mahadevappa DS.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1983,
323
19d
Hiremath RC.
Mayanna SM.
Venkatasubramanian N.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1987,
1569
19e
Takeda T.
Yamauchi S.
Fujiwara T.
Synthesis
1996,
600
20
Casanova J.
Werner ND.
Schuster RE.
J. Org. Chem.
1966,
31:
3473
21 All solvents and reagents were used as obtained from commercial source. Standard 1H NMR and 13C NMR were recorded from CDCl3 solutions at 300 MHz and 75.4 MHz. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV with a direct probe for sample introduction. When possible, compounds were identified by comparison with authentic samples. All runs were conducted at least in duplicate.
General Preparation of
N
,
N
-Dichloroamines. The procedure for the chlorination of benzylamine (Table 1, run 3) is representative for all cases. Benzylamine (2.00 g, 19 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (80 mL) and treated with TCCA (4.64 g, 19 mmol) at 0 °C. After the addition, the mixture was warmed to r.t. and stirred for the required time until completion. After 1 h, TLC analysis showed the complete absence of the amine, the reaction mixture was filtered on Celite and the solvent evaporated to yield N,N-dichlorobenzylamine(3) that was isolated without further purification (oil, 3.2 g, 98%). 1H NMR: δ = 7.39 (s, 5 H), 4.68 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR: δ = 135.1, 130.3, 129.5, 128.8, 79.1. MS: m/e (relative intensity): 179 (1), 177 (3), 176 (1), 175 (4), 112 (2), 106 (3), 105 (14), 104 (23), 103 (4), 92 (91), 91 (100), 79 (1), 78 (4), 77 (15), 76 (3), 65 (9), 63 (2), 51 (9).
General Procedure for the Preparation of Nitriles and
N
-Chloroimines from
N
,
N
-Dichloroamine. The reported procedure is representative: N,N-dichlorocyclohexanamine (2, 1.00 g, 6 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and treated with TEA (2.56 mL, 18 mmol) at 25 °C. After 2 h, TLC analysis showed the complete absence of the N,N-dichloroamine. Then the reaction mixture was washed with H2O (15 mL), with HCl 0.5 N (10 mL), dried on Na2SO4, filtered on Celite and concentrated in vacuo to yield N-chlorocyclohexanimine (18, oil, 0.61 g, 77%). 1H NMR: δ = 2.60-0.95 (br m, 10 H). 13C NMR: δ = 182.8, 36.9, 32.7, 26.9, 25.9, 25.1.
General One-Pot Procedure. The reported procedure is representative: Benzylamine (1.00 g, 9.5 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (10 mL) and treated with TEA (4 mL, 28.5 mmol), and with TCCA (2.32 g, 9.5 mmol) at 25 °C. After 4 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with H2O (20 mL), and then it was extracted twice with Et2O (15 mL). The organic layers were washed with H2O (10 mL), then with HCl 0.5 N (10 mL), were dried (Na2SO4), and the solvent was evaporated to yield benzonitrile (19, 1.1 g, 95%).
General One-Pot Procedure for the Preparation of Nitriles from α-Aminoacids. The reported procedure is representative: l-Phenylalanine (1.20 g, 7.6 mmol) was dissolved in an aq solution of 2 N NaOH (3.8 mL) and treated with TCCA (1.17 g, 5.1 mmol) at 25 °C. After 10 min, when TLC analysis showed the complete absence of the l-phenylalanine, the reaction mixture was treated with HCl (15 mL), followed by an aq solution of 3 N HCl (2.5 mL). After 10 min the mixture was extracted twice with Et2O (15 mL). The organic layers were washed with H2O (10 mL), dried on Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to yield 2-phenylacetonitrile (20, 0.87 g, 98%). 1H NMR: δ = 7.38 (m, 5 H), 3.75 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR: δ = 142.1, 129.1, 127.9, 127.8, 117.8, 23.5.
Some other examples: N
-Chlorodiphenylmethanimine (23): 1H NMR: δ = 7.76 (m, 4 H), 7.39 (m, 6 H). 13C NMR: δ = 165.6, 132.9, 131.5, 129.2, 127.8. Anal. Calcd for C13H10ClN (215.68): C, 72.39; H, 4.67; Cl, 16.44; N, 6.49. Found: C, 72.40; H, 4.66; Cl, 16.44; N, 6.50. The compound was dissolved in THF (10 mL) and treated with 10 mL of aq HCl (1 N) to yield 1.0 g of benzophenone, identified by comparison with an authentic sample.
Methyl-2-chloroimino-3-phenylpropanoate (24): 1H NMR: δ = 7.30 (m, 5 H), 4.26 (s, 2 H), 3.83 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR: δ = 172.3, 172.1, 137.5, 130.3, 129.1, 128.9, 128.7, 53.5, 38.5. Anal. Calcd for C10H10ClNO2 (211.64): C, 56.75; H, 4.76; Cl, 16.75; N, 6.62. Found: C, 56.74; H, 4.76; Cl, 16.75; N, 6.60. The compound was then dissolved in THF (10 mL) and treated with 10 mL of aq HCl (1 N) to yield 1.0 g of methyl phenylpyruvate. 1H NMR: δ = 8.15 (br s, 1 H), 7.30-7.14 (m, 5 H), 6.53 (s, 1 H), 3.93 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR:
δ = 162.4, 152.3, 137.5, 129.1, 128.9, 128.7, 104.5, 53.5.
(
S
)-2-Methylbutanenitrile (28): [α]D
25 +39 (c 1.5, CHCl3). 1H NMR: δ = 2.56 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1 H), 1.62 (m, 2 H), 1.31 (d, J = 7 Hz, 3 H), 1.08 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR: δ = 124.8, 27.1, 26.9, 17.4, 11.1.