Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832323
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Die Auswirkungen von Hakenplatten auf den Subacromialraum
Eine Klinische und MRT-StudieThe Effects of Hook Plates to the Subacromial SpaceA Clinical and MRT StudyPublication History
Publication Date:
07 October 2004 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Studienziel: Die Analyse der mittel- und längerfristigen Resultate nach Behandlung von Schultereckgelenksverletzungen mit Klavikulahakenplatten und Vergleich mit Ergebnissen in der Literatur. Überprüfung des Einflusses der Hakenlage auf den Subakromialraum. Methode: In einer retrospektiven Studie wurden 28 (72 %) von 39 mit einer Hakenplatte nach Dreithaler operierten Patienten mit einer Tossy III Verletzung, durchschnittlich 3,0 (1,2-5,6) Jahre nach Operation, mit klinischer Untersuchung, Schultersonographie und MRT im Seitenvergleich, nachuntersucht. Besonderes Augenmerk legten wir auf den Subakromialraum, um die Auswirkungen des Plattenhakens auf diesen zu beurteilen. Ergebnisse: Die Patienten waren zu 86 % funktionell, aber nur zu 54 % kosmetisch zufrieden. Sonographisch konnte keine höhergradige Läsion der Rotatorenmanschette gefunden werden, altersentsprechende degenerative Veränderungen bei 46 %. Instabilitäten des ACG unter Last bei 7 Patienten (25 %), bei 3 Patienten ausgeprägt (11 %) und bei 2 Patienten (7 %) fanden wir eine statische Subluxation des ACG mit teilweiser Funktionsbeeinträchtigung. Die erhobenen Scores (DASH, Taft, Constant-Murley) zeigten durchschnittlich gute bis sehr gute Ergebnisse. Im MRT zeigte sich in keinem Fall eine komplette Ruptur der Rotatorenmanschette, vermehrt extraartikuläre Ossifikationen, z. T. auch vermehrte AC-Gelenksarthrose. Schlussfolgerung: Die Hakenplatte nach Dreithaler halten wir, wegen einfacher Anwendung und guten bis sehr guten Ergebnissen, für ein geeignetes Implantat für die temporäre Stabilisierung des Schultereckgelenkes zur operativen Versorgung der Schultereckgelenkssprengung.
Abstract
Aim: The analysis of middle- and long-term results after treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries with a hook plate as a temporary implant and a comparison of the results with those described in literature have been made. Method: In a retrospective study we were able to conduct follow-up examinations on 28 out of 39 Tossy III patients (72 %) who received surgical treatment using a hook plate according to Dreithaler. Examinations took place on average 3.0 (1.2-5.6) years after surgery. A special focus of attention was the effect of the hook plate on the subacromial space. Accordingly, physical examination was supplemented by sonography of the shoulder as well as comparative bilateral shoulder MRI. Results: 86 % of our patients expressed satisfaction with the functional outcome of surgery as opposed to 54 % concerning its cosmetic result. In shoulder sonography no patient turned out to have suffered a higher grade rotator cuff lesion, whereas age-related degenerative alterations were found in 46 % of the patients. Instability under load was found in 7 patients (25 %). Among these were 3 with severe instability (11 %). 2 patients (7 %) were found to have a permanent subluxation of the acromioclavicular joint with partial range of motion impairment. All scores monitored (DASH, Taft, Constant-Murley) on average returned good to excellent results. MRI scans displayed no case of higher grade rotator cuff lesion. In accordance with the findings of ultrasound imaging a higher incidence of extraarticular ossification was found as well as, in some cases, arthrosis of the acromioclavicular joint. Conclusion: In our opinion, the hook plate designed by Dreithaler is easy to handle and serves as a qualified implant for temporary stabilisation of the acromioclavicular joint with middle- and long-term good to excellent results.
Schlüsselwörter
Schultereckgelenksverletzung - operative Behandlung - Hakenplatten - Dreithalerplatte - retrospektive Studie
Key words
Acromioclavicular joint injury - operative treatment - hook plates - Dreithaler' plate - retrospective study
Literatur
- 1 Broos P, Stoffelen D, Van de Sijpe K, Fourneau I. Surgical management of complete Tossy III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with the Bosworth screw or the Wolter plate. A critical evaluation. Unfallchirurgie. 1997; 23 153-159
- 2 Bosworth B M. Complete acromioclavicular dislocation. N Engl J Med. 1949; 241 221-225
- 3 Tossy J D, Mead N C, Sigmond H M. Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. Clin Orthop. 1963; 28 111-119
-
4 Rockwood C A. Injuriers to the acromioclavicular jount. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP (eds). Fractures in adults. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Lippincott, Philadelphia 1984; 860-982
-
5 Rockwood C A, Wqirth M. Disorders of the Sternoclavicular Joint. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA (eds). The Shoulder. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia 1998; 555-609
- 6 Balser D. Eine neue Methode zur operativen Behandlung der akromioklavikulären Luxation. Chir Prax. 1976; 24 275
- 7 Henkel T, Oetiker R, Hackenbruch W. Treatment of fresh Tossy III acromioclavicular joint dislocation by ligament suture and temporary fixation with the clavicular hooked plate. Swiss Surg. 1997; 3 160-166
-
8 AAP Implantate AG .AcroPlate nach Dreithaler. 12099 Berlin, Lorenzweg 5; Germany; Tel. +49 30 75 01 91 33
- 9 Germann G, Wind G, Harth A. Der DASH-Fragebogen - Ein neues Instrument zur Beurteilung von Behandlungsergebnissen an der oberen Extremität. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999; 31 149-152
- 10 Constant C R, Murley A H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop. 1987; 214 160-164
- 11 Taft T N, Wilson F C, Oglesby J W. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1987; 69 1045-1051
- 12 Tingart M, Bäthis H, Lefering R. et al . Constant-Score und Neer-Score. Unfallchirurg. 2001; 104 1048-1054
-
13 Constant C R. Age related recovery of shoulder after injury. Thesis, University College, Cork, Ireland 1986
- 14 Fenkl R, Gotzen L. Sonographic diagnosis of the injured acromioclavicular joint. A standardized examination procedure. Unfallchirurg. 1992; 95 393-400
- 15 Loew M, Schiltenwolf M, Bernd L. Sonographische Diagnostik bei Verletzungen des Schultergelenkes. Z Orthop. 1993; 131 302-306
- 16 Phillips A M, Smart C, Groom A F. Acromioclavicular dislocation. Conservative or surgical therapy. Clin Orthop. 1998; 353 10-17
- 17 Larsen E, Bjerg-Nielsen A, Christensen P. Conservativ or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. A prospective, controlled, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1986; 68 552-555
- 18 Bannister G C, Wallace W A, Stableforth P G, Hutson M A. A classification of acute acromioclavicular dislocation: a clinical, radiological and anatomical study. Injury. 1992; 23 194-196
- 19 Bathis H, Tingart M, Bouillon B, Tiling T. Conservative or surgical therapy of acromioclavicular joint injury -what is reliable? A systematic analysis of the literature using “evidence-based medicine” criteria. Chirurg. 2000; 71 1082-1089
- 20 Bathis H, Tingart M, Bouillon B, Tiling T. The status of therapy of acromioclavicular joint injury. Results of a survey of trauma surgery clinics in Germany. Unfallchirurg. 2001; 104 955-960
- 21 Göhring U, Matusewicz A, Friedl W, Ruf W. Results of treatment after different surgical procedures for management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Chirurg. 1993; 64 565-571
- 22 Folwaczny E K, Yakisan D, Sturmer K M. The Balser plate with ligament suture. A dependable method of stabilizing the acromioclavicular joint. Unfallchirurg. 2000; 103 731-740
- 23 Graupe F, Dauer U, Eyssel M. Late results of surgical treatment of Tossy III acromioclavicular joint separation with the Balser plate. Unfallchirurg. 1995; 98 422-426
- 24 Habernek H, Weinstabl R, Schmid L, Fialka C. A crook plate for treatment of acromioclavicular joint separation: indication, technique, and results after one year. J Trauma. 1993; 35 893-901
- 25 Voigt C, Enes-Gaiao F, Fahimi S. Treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation with the Rahmanzadeh joint plate. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1994; 24 128-132
- 26 Hessmann M, Gotzen L, Gehling H. Acromioclavicular reconstruction augmented with polydioxanonsulphate bands. Surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med. 1995; 23 552-556
- 27 Rahmanzadeh R, Voigt C, Fahimi S. Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury. Helv Chir Acta. 1991; 57 805-814
- 28 Sim E, Schwarz N, Hocker K, Berzlanovich A. Repair of complete acromioclavicular separations using the acromioclavicular-hook plate. Clin Orthop. 1995; 314 134-142
Jörg Hackenberger
HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch
Hobrechtsfelder Chaussee 100
13125 Berlin
Phone: +49 30/94 01 76 69
Fax: +49 30/94 01 71 74
Email: jhackenberger@berlin.helios-kliniken.de
Email: jschmidt@berlin.helios-kliniken.de