Zusammenfassung
Der Wert der Positronenemissionstomographie mit 18 F-18-Fluorodesoxyglukose (FDG-PET) für das primäre Staging und das posttherapeutische Restaging beim Ösophaguskarzinom wurde in verschiedenen aktuellen Studien untersucht. Die meisten Studien vergleichen die Ergebnisse der FDG-PET mit denen der Computertomographie und/oder der endoskopischen Ultraschalluntersuchung. Die verschiedenen Autoren stimmen darin überein, dass der klinische Einsatz der FDG-PET sowohl die Identifikation von Lymphknotenmetastasen als auch die von Metastasen in anderen Organen verbessert. Eine zunehmende Zahl von Untersuchern zeigte darüber hinaus die Aussagekraft der FDG-PET für die Analyse des Ansprechens des Ösophaguskarzinoms bei neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie sowie für die Vorhersage des Langzeitüberlebens.
Abstract
Positron emission tomography with 18 F-Florodesoxyglucose (FDG-PET) was recently evaluated by several studies for staging and posttherapeutical re-staging of esophageal cancer. Most studies compared the FDG-PET results to CT and/or endoscopic ultrasonography. The different authors agreed that the use of FDG-PET improves the identification of lymph node metastases as well as of metastases in other organs. A growing number of investigators also showed the value of FDG-PET for the response analysis after neoadjuvant or concurrent radiochemotherapy resp. the prediction of the long-term survival.
Schlüsselwörter
Positronenemissionstomographie - PET - Ösophaguskarzinom - Staging
Key words
positron emission tomography - PET - esophageal cancer - staging
Literatur
1
Dietlein M, Weber W, Schwaiger M, Schicha H.
[18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in restaging of colorectal cancer].
Nuklearmedizin.
2003;
42
145-156
2
Dehdashti F, Siegel B A.
Neoplasms of the esophagus and stomach.
Semin Nucl Med.
2004;
34
198-208
3
Czernin J, Phelps M E.
Positron emission tomography scanning: current and future applications.
Annu Rev Med.
2002;
53
89-112
4
Sciuk J, Hermann S, Franzius C.
[Valence of F-18-FDG-PET in the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma].
Radiologe.
2002;
42
1000-1008
5
Schmidt M, Schmalenbach M, Jungehulsing M, Theissen P. et al .
18 F-FDG PET for detecting recurrent head and neck cancer, local lymph node involvement and distant metastases. Comparison of qualitative visual and semiquantitative analysis.
Nuklearmedizin.
2004;
43
91-101
6
Rosa F, Meimarakis G, Stahl A, Bumm R. et al .
Colorectal cancer patients before resection of hepatic metastases. Impact of (18)F-FDG PET on detecting extrahepatic disease.
Nuklearmedizin.
2004;
43
135-140
7
Keppler J S.
Federal regulations and reimbursement for PET.
J Nucl Med Technol.
2001;
29
173-179
8
Reske S N, Kotzerke J.
FDG-PET for clinical use. Results of the 3rd German Interdisciplinary Consensus Conference, „Onko-PET III”, 21 July and 19 September 2000.
Eur J Nucl Med.
2001;
28
1707-1723
9
Dietlein M, Schicha H.
[Reimbursement of the PET in oncology in Europe: a questionnaire based survey].
Nuklearmedizin.
2003;
42
80-85
10
Weber W A, Dietlein M, Hellwig D, Kirsch C M, Schicha H, Schwaiger M.
[PET with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of non-small cell lung cancer].
Nuklearmedizin.
2003;
42
135-144
11
Block M I, Patterson G A, Sundaresan R S, Bailey M S. et al .
Improvement in staging of esophageal cancer with the addition of positron emission tomography.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1997;
64
770-776
12
Choi J Y, Jang H J, Shim Y M, Kim K. et al .
18 F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: Prognostic implications.
J Nucl Med.
2004;
45
1843-1850
13
Choi J Y, Lee K H, Shim Y M, Lee K S. et al .
Improved detection of individual nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus by FDG PET.
J Nucl Med.
2000;
41
808-815
14
Flamen P, Lerut A, Cutsem E Van, De Wever W. et al .
Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma.
J Clin Oncol.
2000;
18
3202-3210
15
Flanagan F L, Dehdashti F, Siegel B A, Trask D D. et al .
Staging of esophageal cancer with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
168
417-424
16
Kato H, Kuwano H, Nakajima M, Miyazaki T. et al .
Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma.
Cancer.
2002;
94
921-928
17
Kim K, Park S J, Kim B T, Lee K S, Shim Y M.
Evaluation of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with positron emission tomography.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2001;
71
290-294
18
Westreenen H L van, Westerterp M, Bossuyt P M, Pruim J. et al .
Systematic review of the staging performance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer.
J Clin Oncol.
2004;
22
3805-3812
19
Westreenen H L van, Heeren P A, Dullemen H M van, der Jagt E J van. et al .
Positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in a combined staging strategy of esophageal cancer prevents unnecessary surgical explorations.
J Gastrointest Surg.
2005;
9
54-61
20
Brucher B L, Weber W, Bauer M, Fink U. et al .
Neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: response evaluation by positron emission tomography.
Ann Surg.
2001;
233
300-309
21
Downey R J, Akhurst T, Ilson D, Ginsberg R. et al .
Whole body 18 FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial.
J Clin Oncol.
2003;
21
428-432
22
Weber W A, Ott K, Becker K, Dittler H J. et al .
Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;
19
3058-3065
23
Weber W A, Ott K.
Imaging of esophageal and gastric cancer.
Semin Oncol.
2004;
31
530-541
24
Theissen P, Schneider P M, Baldus S E, Jost A. et al .
Monitoring of tumor response to neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy of esophageal carcinoma by F-18-FDG-PET.
Chinese German J Clin Oncol.
2004;
3
257-262
25
Fleming I D, Phillips J L, Menck H R, Murphy G P, Winchester D P.
The National Cancer Data Base report on recent hospital cancer program progress toward complete American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM staging.
Cancer.
1997;
80
2305-2310
26
Lerut T, Flamen P, Ectors N, Cutsem E Van. et al .
Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy.
Ann Surg.
2000;
232
743-752
27
Kato H, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, Takita J. et al .
The incremental effect of positron emission tomography on diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging of esophageal carcinoma.
Cancer.
2005;
103
148-156
28
Flamen P, Lerut A, Cutsem E, Cambier J P. et al .
The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2000;
120
1085-1092
29
Kole A C, Plukker J T, Nieweg O E, Vaalburg W.
Positron emission tomography for staging of oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy.
Br J Cancer.
1998;
78
521-527
30
Meltzer C C, Luketich J D, Friedman D, Charron M. et al .
Whole-body FDG positron emission tomographic imaging for staging esophageal cancer comparison with computed tomography.
Clin Nucl Med.
2000;
25
882-887
31
Rankin S C, Taylor H, Cook G J, Mason R.
Computed tomography and positron emission tomography in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal carcinoma.
Clin Radiol.
1998;
53
659-665
32
Jager P L, Que T H, Vaalburg W, Pruim J, Elsinga P, Plukker J T.
Carbon-11 choline or FDG-PET for staging of oesophageal cancer?.
Eur J Nucl Med.
2001;
28
1845-1849
33
Junginger T, Kneist W, Schreckenberger M, Menzel C, Oberholzer K, Bartenstein P.
[Positron emission tomography for the preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
2002;
127
1935-1941
34
Wren S M, Stijns P, Srinivas S.
Positron emission tomography in the initial staging of esophageal cancer.
Arch Surg.
2002;
137
1001-1006
35
Yoon Y C, Lee K S, Shim Y M, Kim B T, Kim K, Kim T S.
Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study.
Radiology.
2003;
227
764-770
36
Westreenen H L van, Heeren P A, Jager P L, Dullemen H M van, Groen H, Plukker J T.
Pitfalls of positive findings in staging esophageal cancer with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2003;
10
1100-1105
37
Eloubeidi M A, Wallace M B, Hoffman B J, Leveen M B. et al .
Predictors of survival for esophageal cancer patients with and without celiac axis lymphadenopathy: impact of staging endosonography.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2001;
72
212-219
38
Hulscher J B, Buskens C J, Bergman J J, Fockens P, Lanschot J J V, Obertop H.
Positive peritruncal nodes for esophageal carcinoma. not always a dismal prognosis.
Dig Surg.
2001;
18
98-101
39
Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, Lindholm P, Bergman J. et al .
[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in tumors: kinetic vs. steady-state methods with reference to plasma insulin.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1993;
17
115-123
40
Hölscher A H, Metzger R, Schneider P M.
[Preoperative radiochemotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Light at the end of the tunnel?].
Zentralbl Chir.
2000;
125
319-325
41
Kies M S, Rosen S T, Tsang T K, Shetty R. et al .
Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in the primary management of squamous esophageal cancer.
Cancer.
1987;
60
2156-2160
42
Law S, Fok M, Chow S, Chu K M, Wong J.
Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1997;
114
210-217
43
Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, Raemdonck D Van.
Cancer of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction: potentially curative therapies.
Surg Oncol.
2001;
10
113-122
44
Luketich J D, Schauer P, Urso K, Kassis E. et al .
Future directions in esophageal cancer.
Chest.
1998;
113 (Suppl 1)
120S-122S
45
Urba S G, Orringer M B, Turrisi A, Iannettoni M, Forastiere A, Strawderman M.
Randomized trial of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery alone in patients with locoregional esophageal carcinoma.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;
19
305-313
46
Flamen P, Cutsem E, Lerut A, Cambier J P. et al .
Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
Ann Oncol.
2002;
13
361-368
47
Couper G W, Park K G.
Detection of response to neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by positron emission tomography (PET).
Ann Surg.
2003;
237
289-290
48
Wieder H A, Brucher B L, Zimmermann F, Becker K. et al .
Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment.
J Clin Oncol.
2004;
22
900-908
49
Swisher S G, Erasmus J, Maish M, Correa A M. et al .
2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Cancer.
2004;
101
1776-1785
50
Luketich J D, Friedman D M, Weigel T L, Meehan M A. et al .
Evaluation of distant metastases in esophageal cancer: 100 consecutive positron emission tomography scans.
Ann Thorac Surg.
1999;
68
1133-1136
Dr. Peter Theissen
Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · Klinikum der Universität zu Köln
Kerpener Str. 62
50924 Köln
Germany
Telefon: 02 21/4 78 58 56
Fax: 02 21/4 78 67 77
eMail: peter.theissen@uni-koeln.de