Validity and Reliability of the PowerTap Mobile Cycling Powermeter when Compared with the SRM Device

Abstract

The SRM power measuring crank system is nowadays a popular device for cycling power output (PO) measurements in the field and in laboratories. The PowerTap (CycleOps, Madison, USA) is a more recent and less well-known device that allows mobile PO measurements of cycling via the rear wheel hub. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the PowerTap by comparing it with the most accurate (i.e. the scientific model) of the SRM system. The validity of the PowerTap is tested during i) sub-maximal incremental intensities (ranging from 100 to 420 W) on a treadmill with different pedalling cadences (45 to 120 rpm) and cycling positions (standing and seated) on different grades, ii) a continuous sub-maximal intensity lasting 30 min, iii) a maximal intensity (8-s sprint), and iiii) real road cycling. The reliability is assessed by repeating ten times the sub-maximal incremental and continuous tests. The results show a good validity of the PowerTap during sub-maximal intensities between 100 and 450 W (mean PO difference -1.2 ± 1.3 %) when it is compared to the scientific SRM model, but less validity for the maximal PO during sprint exercise, where the validity appears to depend on the gear ratio. The reliability of the PowerTap during the sub-maximal intensities is similar to the scientific SRM model (the coefficient of variation is respectively 0.9 to 2.9 % and 0.7 to 2.1 % for PowerTap and SRM). The PowerTap must be considered as a suitable device for PO measurements during sub-maximal real road cycling and in sub-maximal laboratory tests.

Key words

Cycling - mobile powermeter - SRM system - power output - comparison

References

• 1 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-238
• 2 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
• 3 Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Grappe F. Validity and reliability of the Axiom Powertrain cycle ergometer when compared with an SRM ergometer.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 59-65
• 4 Bertucci W, Taiar R, Grappe F. Differences between sprint tests under laboratory and actual cycling conditions.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. (in press); 
• 5 Fregly B J, Zajac F E, Dairaghi C A. Crank inertial load has little effect on steady-state pedalling coordination.  J Biomech. 1996;  29 1559-1567
• 6 Grappe F, Candau R, Belli A, Rouillon J D. Aerodynamic drag in field cycling with special references to the Obree's position.  Ergonomics. 1997;  40 1299-1311
• 7 Grappe F, Candau R, Barbier B, Hoffman M, Belli A, Rouillon J D. Influence of tyre pressure and vertical load on coefficient of rolling resistance and simulated cycling performance.  Ergonomics. 1999;  10 1361-1371
• 8 Hintzy F, Belli A, Grappe Rouillon F JD. Optimal pedalling velocity characteristics during maximal and submaximal cycling in humans.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1999;  79 426-432
• 9 Hopkins W G, Schabort E J, Hawley J A. Reliability of power in physical performance tests.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 211-234
• 10 Jones S M, Passfield L. Dynamic calibration of bicycle power measuring cranks. Haake SJ The Engineering of Sport. Oxford; Blackwell Science 1998: 265-274
• 11 Kyle C, Caiozzo V. Experiments in human ergometry as applied to human powered vehicles.  Int J Sports Biomech. 1986;  2 6-19
• 12 Lawton E W, Martin D T, Lee H. Validation of SRM Power Cranks Using Dynamic Calibration. Fifth IOC World Congress, Oct 31 - Nov 5, 1999. Sydney; International Olympic Committee 1999
• 13 Martin J C, Milliken D L, Cobb J E, McFadden K L, Coggan A R. Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power.  J Appl Biomech. 1998;  14 276-291
• 14 Martin J C, Spirduso W. Determinants of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedalling rate, and pedal speed.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;  84 413-418
• 15 Millet G P, Tronche C, Fuster N, Bentley D J, Candau R. Validity and reliability of the Polar®S710 mobile cycling powermeter.  Int J Sports Med. 2003;  24 156-161
• 16 Nevill A. Why the analysis of performance variables recorded on a ratio scale will invariably benefit from a log transformation.  J Sports Sci. 1997;  15 457-458
• 17 Nevill A M, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science.  Br J Sports Med. 1997;  31 314-318
• 18 Paton C D, Hopkins W G. Tests of cycling performance.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 489-496
• 19 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H. Force-velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987;  56 650-656
• 20 Van Soest A, Casius R. Which factors determine the optimal pedalling rate in sprint cycling?.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 1927-1934