The Effect of Crank Rate on Physiological Responses and Exercise Efficiency Using a Range of Submaximal Workloads During Arm Crank Ergometry

Abstract

This study examined the effects of variations in crank rate on physiological responses during submaximal arm ergometry. Fifteen non-specifically trained male subjects volunteered to participate in this study. Each subject undertook a discontinuous arm crank ergometry test (30, 50, 70, 90 W) on three separate occasions using crank rates of 50, 70, and 90 rev · min^-1. Respiratory parameters and heart rate were continuously monitored. An 80-µL capillary blood sample was obtained immediately following each exercise bout for the determination of whole blood lactate. Measures of efficiency were calculated using specific caloric equivalents of oxygen consumption (V·O₂). Heart rate was lowest (p < 0.05) at 30, 50, and 70 W using 50 rev · min^-1. Values of gross and net efficiency tended to be higher (p < 0.05) using 50 rev · min^-1 at the lower absolute workloads, but no differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the three crank rates at 90 W. No differences (p > 0.05) were observed between crank rates for delta efficiency. This study confirms that variations in crank rate can influence gross and net values of V·O₂ and exercise efficiency at low absolute workloads, but crank rate ceases to be an influential factor at moderate workloads. Further research is required to identify the specific mechanisms underpinning the observations reported in the present study relating to the interaction between crank rate, workload, and exercise efficiency during arm crank ergometry.

Arm exercise - crank rate - gross efficiency - net efficiency - delta efficiency

References

• 1 Brisswalter J, Hausswirth C, Smith D, Vercruyssen F, Vallier J M. Energetically optimal cadence vs. freely chosen cadence during cycling: effects of exercise duration.  Int J Sports Med. 1999;  20 60-64
• 2 Chavarren J, Calbet J AL. Cycling efficiency and pedalling frequency in road cyclists.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1999;  80 555-563
• 3 Coast J R, Welch H G. Linear increase in optimal pedal rate with increased power output in cycle ergometry.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1985;  53 339-342
• 4 DiCarlo S E. Effect of arm ergometry on wheelchair propulsion endurance of individuals with quadriplegia.  Phys Ther. 1988;  68 40-44
• 5 Donovan C M, Brookes G A. Muscular efficiency during steady-state exercise: effects of speed and work rate.  J Appl Physiol. 1977;  43 431-439
• 6 Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows. London, England; Sage Publications 2000
• 7 Gaesser G A, Brooks G A. Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate.  J Appl Physiol. 1975;  38 1132-1139
• 8 Glaser R M. Arm exercise training for wheelchair users.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;  21 149-157
• 9 Kang J, Robertson R J, Goss F L, Dasilva S G, Suminski R R, Utter A C, Zoeller R F, Metz K F. Metabolic efficiency during arm and leg exercise at the same relative intensities.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 377-382
• 10 Kang J, Chaoupka E C, Mastrangelo M A, Angelucc J. Physiological responses to upper body exercise on an arm and a modified leg ergometer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;  31 1453-1459
• 11 MacIntosh B R, Neptune R R, Horton J F. Cadence, power and muscle activation in cycle ergometry.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 1281-1287
• 12 Marais G, Weissland T, Robin H, Vanvelcenaher J M, Lavoie J M, Pelayo P. Physiological effects of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate during sub-maximal and supra-maximal upper body exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1999;  20 239-245
• 13 McArdle W D, Katch F I, Katch V L. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance. Baltimore, Maryland; Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins 2001
• 14 Myers J, Bellin D. Ramp exercise protocols for clinical and cardiopulmonary exercise testing.  Sports Med. 2000;  30 23-29
• 15 Pollock M L, Miller H S, Linnerud A C, Laughridge E, Coleman E, Alexander E. Arm pedalling as an endurance training regime for the diabled.  Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1974;  55 418-424
• 16 Péronnet F, Massicotte D. Table of non-protein respiratory quotient: an update.  Can J Sports Sci. 1991;  16 23-29
• 17 Powers S K, Beadle R E, Magnum M. Exercise efficiency during arm ergometry: effects of speed and work rate.  J Appl Physiol. 1984;  56 495-499
• 18 Price M J, Campbell I G. Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise.  Ergonomics. 1997;  40 491-499
• 19 Sawka M N, Foley M E, Pimental N A, Toner M M, Pandolf K B. Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper body exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1983;  54 113-117
• 20 Sawka M N. Physioloy of upper body exercise.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1986;  14 175-211
• 21 Seabury J J, Adams W C, Ramey M R. Influence of pedalling rate and power output on energy expenditure during bicycle ergometry.  Ergonomics. 1977;  20 491-498
• 22 Shaw D J, Crawford M H, Karliner J S, DiDonna G, Carleton R M, Ross J, O'Rourke R A. Arm-crank ergometry: a new method for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.  Am J Cardiol. 1974;  33 801-805
• 23 Smith P M, Price M J, Doherty M. The influence of crank rate on peak oxygen uptake during arm crank ergometry.  J Sports Sci. 2001;  19 955-960
• 24 Smith P M, Price M J. Letter to the editors: comments on Marais et al.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 540-541
• 25 Stuart M K, Howley E T, Gladden L B, Cox R H. Efficiency of trained subjects differing in maximal oxygen uptake and type of training.  J Appl Physiol. 1981;  50 444-449
• 26 Weissland T, Marais G, Robin H, Vanvelcenaher J, Pelayo P. Relationship in humans between spontaneously chosen crank rate and power output during upper body exercise at different levels of intensity.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1999;  79 230-236