Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Das Ziel der Studie der hepatisch arteriellen Doppler-Sonographie war es, die Interobserver- und Interequipmentvariabilität zu ermitteln, jeden möglichen artifiziellen Einfluss des Ultraschallsignalverstärkers auf die Doppler-Messungen zu untersuchen und die Ergebnisse bei Gesunden und Leberzirrhose zu vergleichen. Methoden: Bei 9 Lebergesunden und 9 Patienten mit Leberzirrhose wurde die Doppler-Sonographie der linken Leberarterie durch drei unabhängige Untersucher an drei verschiedenen Geräten durchgeführt. Dabei erfolgte eine doppelt verblindete, kontinuierliche Infusion des Ultraschallsignalverstärkers SHU 508A und Plazebo. Es wurden systolische, mittlere und diastolische Geschwindigkeit, Resistenz- und Pulsatilitätsindex gemessen. Ergebnisse: Die geräteabhängige Varianz (5,8 - 12,7 %) der fünf Doppler-Parameter war größer als die untersucherabhängige Varianz (0,3 - 3,6 %). Es bestanden keine signifikanten Unterschiede bei den Geschwindigkeiten zwischen Ultraschallsignalverstärker und Plazebo. Die systolische (65,9 ± 3,6 vs. 47,7 ± 4,2 cm/s mean ± SE, p = 0,02) und mittlere Geschwindigkeit (35,4 ± 1,6 vs. 24,5 ± 1,8 cm/s, p = 0,007) waren bei Leberzirrhose signifikant höher als bei Lebergesunden, während sich Resistenz- und Pulsatilitätsindex nicht unterschieden. Schlussfolgerung: Die Doppler-Sonographie der linken Leberarterie ist bei unterschiedlichen Untersuchern reproduzierbar, solange das gleiche Gerät verwendet wird. Unter klinischen Bedingungen werden bei der Anwendung des Ultraschallsignalverstärkers die Geschwindigkeiten korrekt gemessen und sind bei Patienten mit Zirrhose erhöht.
Abstract
Purpose: The aims of this study on hepatic arterial Doppler sonography were to ascertain interobserver and interequipment variability, to investigate any potential artificial influence of the ultrasonic contrast agent on the Doppler measurements and to compare the results in healthy and cirrhotic subjects. Methods: Doppler sonography of the left hepatic artery was performed in nine healthy and nine cirrhotic subjects by three independent observers using three different devices. Continuous infusion of the ultrasonic contrast agent SHU 508A and placebo were administered in a double blind fashion. Systolic, mean and end diastolic peak velocities as well as resistive and pulsatility indices were measured. Results: Equipment associated variances (5.8 - 12.7 %) of the five Doppler parameters were greater than interobserver variances (0.3 - 3.6 %). No significant differences were observed between the velocities using ultrasonic contrast agent and placebo. Systolic (65.9 ± 3.6 vs. 47.7 ± 4.2 cm/s mean ± SE, p = 0.02) and mean peak velocity (35.4 ± 1.6 vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 cm/s, p = 0.007) were significantly higher in cirrhotic than in healthy subjects whereas the resistive and pulsatility indices were not different. Conclusions: Doppler sonography of the left hepatic artery performed by various observers is reproducible as long as the same device is used. Under clinical conditions, velocities are correctly measured with the use of ultrasonic contrast agent and are elevated in patients with cirrhosis.
Schlüsselwörter
Leberzirrhose - Doppler-Sonographie - Leberarterie - Ultraschallsignalverstärker
Key words
Liver cirrhosis - Doppler sonography - hepatic artery - ultrasonic contrast agent
References
1
Kleber G, Steudel N, Behrmann C. et al .
Hepatic arterial flow volume and reserve in patients with cirrhosis: Use of intraarterial Doppler and adenosine infusion.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
116
906-914
2
Richter G M, Brado M, Simon C. et al .
Changes in liver perfusion caused by transjugular intrahepatic stent shunt (TIPSS).
Zentralbl Chir.
1997;
122
108-116
3
Hübner G H, Steudel N, Kleber G. et al .
Hepatic arterial blood flow velocities: assessment by transcutaneous and intravascular Doppler sonography.
J Hepatol.
2000;
32
893-899
4
Fisher A J, Paulson E K, Kliewer M A. et al .
Doppler sonography of the portal vein and hepatic artery: measurement of a prandial effect in healthy subjects.
Radiology.
1998;
207
711-715
5
Paulson E K, Kliewer M A, Frederick M G. et al .
Hepatic artery: variability in measurement of resistive index and systolic acceleration time in healthy volunteers.
Radiology.
1996;
200
725-729
6
Sacerdoti D, Gaiani S, Buonamico P. et al .
Interobserver and interequipment variability of hepatic, splenic, and renal arterial Doppler resistance indices in normal subjects and patients with cirrhosis.
J Hepatol.
1997;
27
986-992
7
Gutberlet M, Venz S, Neuhaus R. et al .
Contrast agent enhanced duplex ultrasonography: visualization of the hepatic artery after orthotopic liver transplantation.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
1997;
166
411-416
8
Forsberg F, Liu J B, Burns P N. et al .
Artifacts in ultrasonic contrast agent studies.
J Ultrasound Med.
1994;
13
357-365
9
Sponheim N, Myhrum M.
An in vitro study on the influence of limited frequency resolution on contrast agent-enhanced Doppler signals.
Ultrasonics.
1996;
34
599-601
10
Gaiani S, Serra C, Piscaglia F. et al .
Effect of Levovist on splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic patients.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
2003;
29
643-648
11
Colli A, Cocciolo M, Mumoli N. et al .
Hepatic artery resistance in alcoholic liver disease.
Hepatology.
1998;
28
1182-1186
12
Iwao T, Toyonaga A, Oho K. et al .
Value of Doppler ultrasound parameters of portal vein and hepatic artery in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1997;
92
1012-1017
13
Pierce M E, Sewell R.
Identification of hepatic cirrhosis by duplex Doppler ultrasound value of the hepatic artery resistive index.
Australas Radiol.
1990;
34
331-333
14
Sacerdoti D, Merkel C, Bolognesi M. et al .
Hepatic arterial resistance in cirrhosis with and without portal vein thrombosis: relationships with portal hemodynamics.
Gastroenterology.
1995;
108
1152-1158
15
Schneider A W, Kalk J F, Klein C P.
Hepatic arterial pulsatility index in cirrhosis: correlation with portal pressure.
J Hepatol.
1999;
30
876-881
16
Piscaglia F, Zironi G, Gaiani S. et al .
Relationship between splanchnic, peripheral and cardiac haemodynamics in liver cirrhosis of different degrees of severity.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
1997;
9
799-804
17
Taourel P, Blanc P, Dauzat M. et al .
Doppler study of mesenteric, hepatic, and portal circulation in alcoholic cirrhosis: relationship between quantitative Doppler measurements and the severity of portal hypertension and hepatic failure.
Hepatology.
1998;
28
932-936
18
Vassiliades V G, Ostrow T D, Chezmar J L. et al .
Hepatic arterial resistive indices: correlation with the severity of cirrhosis.
Abdom Imaging.
1993;
18
61-65
19
Lautt W W.
Mechanism and role of intrinsic regulation of hepatic arterial blood flow: hepatic arterial buffer response.
Am J Physiol.
1985;
249
G549-556
20
Kawasaki T, Carmichael F J, Saldivia V. et al .
Relationship between portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flows: spectrum of response.
Am J Physiol.
1990;
259
G1010-1018
21
Burchell A R, Moreno A H, Panke W F. et al .
Hepatic artery flow improvement after portacaval shunt: A single hemodynamic correlate.
Ann Surg.
1976;
184
289-302
22
Steudel N, Kleber G, Behrmann C. et al .
Prognostic value of hepatic arterial buffer response in patients with cirrhosis with and without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
Hepatology.
1997;
26 (Suppl. 4)
139 A
23
Aoki H, Hasumi A, Hashizume M. et al .
Hemodynamic analysis of findings in patients with portal hypertension: multicenter analysis in Japan. Japan Portal Hypertension Study Group.
Hepatogastroenterology.
1995;
42
1030-1038
24
Bolondi L, Zironi G, Gaiani S. et al .
Caliber of splenic and hepatic arteries and spleen size in cirrhosis of different etiology.
Liver.
1991;
11
198-205
25
Tanaka K, Mitsui K, Morimoto M. et al .
Increased hepatic arterial blood flow in acute viral hepatitis: assessment by color Doppler sonography.
Hepatology.
1993;
18
21-27
26
Piscaglia F, Gaiani S, Zironi G. et al .
Intra- and extrahepatic arterial resistances in chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis.
Ultrasound Med Biol.
1997;
23
675-682
27
Sabba C, Merkel C, Zoli M. et al .
Interobserver and interequipment variability of echo-Doppler examination of the portal vein: effect of a cooperative training program.
Hepatology.
1995;
21
428-433
28
Gutberlet M, Venz S, Zendel W. et al .
Do ultrasonic contrast agents artificially increase maximum Doppler shift? In vivo study of human common carotid arteries.
J Ultrasound Med.
1998;
17
97-102
29
von Bibra H, Sutherland G, Becher H. et al .
Clinical evaluation of left heart Doppler contrast enhancement by a saccharide-based transpulmonary contrast agent. The Levovist Cardiac Working Group.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1995;
25
500-508
30
Albrecht T, Urbank A, Mahler M. et al .
Prolongation and optimization of Doppler enhancement with a microbubble US contrast agent by using continuous infusion: preliminary experience.
Radiology.
1998;
207
339-347
Dr. Georg H. Hübner
Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Kreiskrankenhaus Köthen
Friederikenstr. 30
06366 Köthen
Germany
Phone: ++ 49/34 96/15 01
Fax: ++ 49/34 96/15 09
Email: huebner@krankenhaus-koethen.de