Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-861131
Gestörtes Hören
Die apparative Versorgung der Schwerhörigkeit: Konventionelle und implantierbare Hörgeräte
Publication History
Publication Date:
22 April 2005 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/lro/2005S1/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2005-861131-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Im Rahmen des vorliegenden Referates werden die aktuellen Konzepte der apparativen Versorgung Hörgeschädigter in überschaubarem Umfang referiert. Besondere Merkmale zur Beurteilung konventioneller Hörgeräte sind neben der Frage „analoge” versus „digitale” Versorgung unterschiedliche Strategien zur Verbesserung des Hörens im Störgeräusch. Auf dem Gebiet der implantierbaren Hörgeräte sind derzeit ausschließlich Teilimplantate kommerziell erhältlich. Diese bieten vor allem eine Verbesserung der Klangqualität. Deren wesentlicher Nachteil ist die fehlende Richtmikrofonwirkung ihrer externen Komponenten. Zwei unterschiedliche vollimplantierbare Hörgeräte befinden sich momentan in der klinischen Prüfung. Eine der interessantesten neuen Entwicklungen ist die kombinierte elektrische und akustische Stimulation.
Schlüsselwörter
Hören im Störschall - teilimplantierbare Hörgeräte - vollimplantierbare Hörgeräte - elektroakustische Stimulation
Literatur
-
1 Zenner H P.
Implantierbare Hörgeräte - aktueller Stand. In: Jahnke K (Hrsg) Verhandlungsbericht der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. Stuttgart; Thieme 2000: 141-161 - 2 Dazert S, Shehata-Dieler W E, Dieler R, Helms J. Das Mittelohrimplantat „Vibrant Soundbridge” zur Hörrehabilitation bei sensorischer Schwerhörigkeit. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol. 2000; 79 459-464
- 3 Spindel J H. Middle ear implantable hearing devices. Am J Audiol. 2002; 11 104-113
- 4 Wood S A, Lutman M E. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids. Int J Audiol. 2004; 43 144-155
- 5 Parving A. The hearing aid revolution: fact or fiction. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003; 123 245-248
- 6 Mudry A, Dodelé L. History of the technological development of air conduction hearing aids. J Laryngol Otol. 2000; 114 418-423
- 7 Baguley D M, Luxon L M. The future of audiological rehabilitation. J Laryngol Otol. 2000; 114 167-169
- 8 Derleth R P, Dau T, Kollmeier B. Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system. Hear Res. 2001; 159 132-149
- 9 Dhar S, Humes L E, Calandruccio L, Barlow N N, Hipskind N. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing aids. Ear Hear. 2004; 25 147-158
- 10 Boymans M, Dreschler W A. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology. 2000; 39 260-268
- 11 Olsen H L, Hagermann B. Directivity of different hearing aid microphone locations. Int J Audiol. 2002; 41 48-56
- 12 Taylor R S, Paisley S, Davis A. Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of digital hearing aids. Br J Audiol. 2001; 35 271-288
- 13 Bentler R A, Niebuhr D P, Johnson T A, Flamme G A. Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures. Ear Hear. 2003; 24 215-224
- 14 Prinz I, Nubel K, Gross M. Digitale versus analoge Hörgeräte bei Kindern. HNO. 2002; 50 844-849
- 15 Todt I, Seidl R O, Gross M, Ernst A. Comparison of different Vibrant Soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing aids. Otol Neurootol. 2002; 23 669-673
- 16 Gussekloo J, de Bont L E, von Faber M, Eekhof J A, de Laat J A, Huls J H, van Dongen E, Westendorp R G. Auditory rehabilitation of older people from general population - the Leiden 86-plus study. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53 536-540
- 17 Stieger C, Wäckerlin D, Bernhard H, Stahel A, Kompis M, Häusler R, Burger J. Computer assisted optimization of an electromagnetic transducer design for implantable hearing aids. Comput Biol Med. 2004; 34 141-152
- 18 Leysieffer H, Baumann J W, Müller G, Zenner H P. Ein implantierbarer piezoelektrischer Hörgerätewandler für Innenohrschwerhörige. HNO. 1997; 45 792-800
- 19 Javel E, Grant I L, Kroll K. In vivo characterization of piezoelectric transducers for implantable hearing aids. Otol Neurootol. 2003; 24 784-795
- 20 Zenner H P, Leysieffer H, Maassen M, Lehner R, Lenarz T, Baumann J, Keiner S, Plinkert P K, McElveen J T. Human studies of a piezoelectric transducer and a microphone for a totally implantable electronic hearing device. Am J Otol. 2000; 21 196-204
- 21 Maniglia A J, Murray G, Arnold J E, Ko W H. Bioelectric microphone options for a totally implantable hearing device for partial and total hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001; 34 469-483
- 22 Yanagihara H, Sato H, Hinohira Y, Gyo K, Hori K. Long-term results using a piezoelectric semi-implantable middle ear hearing device: The Rion Device E-type. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001; 34 389-400
- 23 Zenner H P, Limberger A, Baumann J W, Reischl G, Zalaman I M, Mauz P S, Sweetow R W, Plinkert P K, Zimmermann R, Baumann I, de Maddalena H, Leysieffer H, Maassen M M. Phase III results with a totally implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: speech audiometry, spatial hearing and psychosocial adjustment. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004; 124 155-164
- 24 Zenner H P, Leysieffer H. Total implantation of the Implex TICA hearing amplifier implant for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001; 34 417-446
- 25 Spindel J H, Lambert P R, Ruth R A. The round window electromagnetic implantable hearing aid approach. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995; 28 189-205
- 26 Hüttenbrink K B. Middle ear mechanics and their interface with respect to implantable electronic otologic devices. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001; 34 315-335
- 27 Priwin C, Stenfeldt S, Granström G, Tjellström A, Hakansson B. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114 77-84
- 28 Tjellström A, Hakansson B, Granström G. Bone-anchored hearing aids. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001; 34 337-364
- 29 Snik A FM, Bosman A J, Mylanus E AM, Cremers C WRJ. Candidacy for the bone-anchored hearing aid. Audiol Neurootol. 2004; 9 190-196
- 30 Federspil P A, Plinkert P K. Knochenverankerte Hörgeräte immer beidseitig!. HNO. 2002; 50 405-409
- 31 Bance M, Abel S M, Papsin B C, Wade P, Vendramini J. A comparison of the audiometric performance of bone anchored hearing aids and air conduction hearing aids. Otol Neurootol. 2002; 23 912-919
- 32 Mißfeldt N, Braun A, Zwirner P. Beidseitige BAHA-Versorgung bei Kindern mit Ohrmuscheldysplasie und/oder Gehörgangsatresie. HNO. 2002; 50 495-499
- 33 Niparko J K, Cox K M, Lustig L R. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurootol. 2003; 24 73-78
- 34 MacLarnon C M, Davison T, Johnson I JM. Bone-anchored hearing aid: comparison of benefit by patient subgroups. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114 942-944
- 35 Weber P C. Medical and surgical considerations for implantable hearing prosthetic devices. Am J Audiol. 2002; 11 134-138
- 36 Sterkers O, Boucarra D, Labassi S, Bebear J P, Dubreuil C, Frachet B, Fraysse B, Lavieille J P, Magnan J, Martin C, Truy E, Uziel A, Vaneecloo F M. A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: Retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France. Otol Neurootol. 2003; 24 427-436
- 37 Snik A FM, Mylanus E AM, Cremers C WRJ, Dillier N, Fisch U, Gnadeberg D, Lenarz T, Mazolli M, Babighian G, Uziel A S, Cooper H R, O'Connor A F, Fraysse B, Charachon R, Shehata-Dieler W E. Multicenter audiometric results with the Vibrant Soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing impairment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001; 34 373-388
- 38 Snik A FM, Cremers C WRJ. Vibrant semi-implantable hearing device with digital sound processing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 127 1433-1437
- 39 Uziel A, Mondain M, Hagen P, Dejean F, Doucet G. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: A comparative study. Otol Neurootol. 2003; 24 775-783
- 40 Fraysse B, Lavieille J P, Schmerber S, Enée V, Truy E, Vincent C, Vaneecloo F M, Sterkers O. A multicenter study of the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant: Early clinical results and experience. Otol Neurootol. 2001; 22 952-961
- 41 Fredrickson J M, Coticchia J M, Khosla S. Ongoing investigations into implantable electromagnetic hearing aid for moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995; 28 107-120
- 42 Waldmann B, Maier H, Leuwer R. Indicators for efficient coupling of the Otologics MET ossicular stimulator. 3rd symposium of middle ear mechanics in research and otology. Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan, 9. - 12. 07. 2003.
- 43 Jenkins H A, Niparko J K, Slattery W H, Neely J G, Fredrickson J M. Otologics middle ear transducer ossicular stimulator: Performance results with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004; 124 391-394
- 44 Hough J VD, Dyer R K, Matthews P, Wood M W. Early clinical results: Soundtec implantable hearing device phase II study. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111 1-8
- 45 Roland P S, Shoup A G, Shea M C, Richey H S, Jones D B. Verification of improved patient outcomes with partially implantable hearing aid, the Soundtec direct hearing system. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111 1682-1686
- 46 Hough J VD, Matthews P, Wood M W, Dyer R K. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device. Otol Neurootol. 2002; 23 895-903
- 47 Dyer R K, Dormer K J, Hough J VD, Nakmali U, Wickersham R. Biomedical influences of magnetic resonance imaging on the Soundtec direct system implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 127 520-530
- 48 Hoth S, Lohaus M, Waldmann B. Frühe akustisch evozierte Potenziale bei direkter mechanischer Stimulation der Gehörknöchelchenkette. HNO. 2003; 51 550-557
- 49 Snik A, Noten J, Cremers C. Gain and maximum output of two electromagnetic middle ear implants: are real ear measurements helpful?. J Am Acad Audiol. 2004; 15 249-257
- 50 Cayé-Thomasen P, Jensen J H, Bonding P, Tos M. Long-term results and experience with the first-generation semi-implantable electromagnetic hearing aid with ossicular replacement device for mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurootol. 2002; 23 904-911
- 51 von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Pfenningsdorff T, Hartmann R, Stürzebecher E, Klinke R. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL. 1999; 61 334-340
- 52 Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach M H, Lehnert T, Gstoettner W. Development and Evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114 1237-1241
- 53 Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W D, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004; 124 348-352
- 54 Gantz B J, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004; 124 344-347
Prof. Dr. R. Leuwer
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martinistr. 52 · 20246 Hamburg
Email: leuwer@uke.uni-hamburg.de