Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic intracorporeal knots have potentially enormous applications in endoscopic surgery. We describe a method for testing the security of various types of endoscopically tied knots using a vessel perfusion manometer system.
Methods: A 4-cm segment of porcine splenic artery was placed on the mucosal surface of a pig stomach. The two ends of the vessel were brought out through the gastric wall and connected to a two-way manometer. One end was also joined to a pressure infusion bag. The stomach was mounted in an Erlangen training model. A long 3/0 nylon thread, previously introduced into the submucosal layer of the stomach and encircling the vessel, was brought out from the mouth. Three-throw square knots, Mayo knots, “surgeon’s” knots and five-throw square knots were tied and pushed into place using a cap attached to a gastroscope. The pressure at the two ends of the artery was compared. If the pressure could be increased to over 200 mm Hg at one end without a change in the other, the knot was considered secure.
Results: Each type of knot was tested 12 times under endoscopic vision. The range for mean knotting time was 3.4 - 4.5 minutes. Five-throw knots took significantly longer to tie than three-throw knots (P < 0.005). There was one loose knot in each of the three-throw and Mayo groups, and three each in the “surgeon’s” and five-throw groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: This system is a reliable model for testing intracorporeal knots tied endoscopically. A three-half-hitches square knot with 3/0 nylon, tied using a flexible endoscope and knot-tightening cap, can withstand pressure up to 200 mm Hg.
References
1
Swain C P, Kadirkamanathan S S, Gong F. et al .
Knot tying at flexible endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
722-729
2
Swain C P, Evans D F, Glynn M. et al .
Endoscopic sewing machine used to achieve continuous noninvasive monitoring of gastric pH for three months in man [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc.
1992;
38
278
3
Swain C P.
Endoscopic suturing.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
1999;
13
97-108
4
Neumann M, Hochberger J, Felzmann T. et al .
The Erlanger endo-trainer.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
887-890
5
Schaffer S R.
The surgeon’s knot tied with one hand.
Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1984;
159
171-172
6
Khatri V P, Cunningham P.
A different technique of tying the surgeon’s knot.
Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1992;
175
464-465
7
Shaw A D, Duthie G S.
A simple assessment of surgical sutures and knots.
J R Coll Surg Edinb.
1995;
40
388-391
8
Dorsey J H, Sharp H T, Chovan J D. et al .
Laparoscopic knot strength: a comparison with conventional knots.
Obstet Gynecol.
1995;
86
536-540
9
Brown R P.
Knotting technique and suture materials.
Br J Surg.
1992;
79
399-400
10
Hanna G B, Frank T G, Cuschieri A.
Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality.
Am J Surg.
1997;
174
410-413
11
Emam T A, Hanna G B, Kimber C. et al .
Differences between experts and trainees in the motion pattern of the dominant upper limb during intracorporeal endoscopic knotting.
Dig Surg.
2000;
17
120-123
12
Emam T A, Hanna G B, Kimber C. et al .
Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements.
Arch Surg.
2000;
135
62-65
S. C. S. Chung, M. D.
Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong ·
Shatin N.T. · Hong Kong SAR · China
Fax: +852-2635-0075
Email: sydneychung@cuhk.edu.hk