The Current Status of the Acticon^® Neosphincter

ABSTRACT

Severe fecal incontinence is a very debilitating condition with a tremendous impact on an individual's life. In the past if a patient was not amenable to a tissue repair or failed a tissue repair, a colostomy was his or her only surgical option. New innovations have emerged giving patients more options to regain continence. The Acticon^® Neosphincter, which is an artificial bowel sphincter, is one of those newer options. The device is reserved for patients with severe fecal incontinence that is not amenable to lesser forms of therapy. Because it is an artificial device, the risk of infection is of particular concern. With experience, however, the infection rate has declined and the artificial bowel sphincter has become a good option for patients with severe fecal incontinence. The results are quite impressive with a significant number of patients obtaining complete continence.

KEYWORDS

Artificial bowel sphincter - fecal incontinence - Acticon^® Neosphincter

REFERENCES

• 1 Drossman D A, Li Z, Andruzzi E et al.. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact.  Dig Dis Sci. 1993;  38 1569-1580
• 2 Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal continence.  Lancet. 1987;  2 244-245
• 3 Wong W D, Congliosi S M, Spencer M P et al.. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1139-1153
• 4 Parker S C, Spencer M P, Madoff R D, Jensen L L, Wong W D, Rothenberger D A. Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 722-729
• 5 Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi A M, Denis P. Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution.  Ann Surg. 2003;  237 52-56
• 6 Devesa J M, Rey A, Hervas P L et al.. Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 1154-1163
• 7 Lehur P A, Roig J V, Duinslaeger M. Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1100-1106
• 8 Ortiz H, Armendariz P, DeMiguel M, Ruiz M, Alos R, Roig J V. Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 877-881
• 9 Gregorcyk S G, Tuckson W B, Sullivan T C et al.. Artificial bowel sphincter: low infection rates are achievable. In progress. 
• 10 Ortiz H, Armendariz P, DeMiguel M, Solana A, Alos R, Roig J V. Prospective study of artificial anal sphincter and dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;  18 349-354
• 11 Christiansen J, Rasmussen O, Lindorff-Larsen K. Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence.  Ann Surg. 1999;  230 45-48
• 12 Colquhoun P H, Efron J, Wexner S D. Attainment of continence with J-pouch and artificial bowel sphincter for concomitant imperforate anus and familial adenomatous polyposis: report of a case.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 538-541
• 13 Romano G, LaTorre F, Cutini G, Bianco F, Esposito P, Montori A. Total anorectal reconstruction with the artificial bowel sphincter: report of eight cases. A quality-of-life assessment.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 730-734