Zusammenfassung
Junge Erwachsene, die sich einer Aortenklappenoperation unterziehen müssen, werden oft eine (relative) Kontraindikation gegen eine orale Antikoagulation aufweisen, weil entweder ein Schwangerschaftswunsch besteht oder ein sehr aktiver Lebensstil geführt wird. Dieser Übersichtsartikel zeigt die chirurgischen Optionen auf, die in solchen Fällen bestehen, und bewertet die zur Verfügung stehende Literatur bezüglich der Frage, welche Erfahrungen für die einzelnen Techniken speziell mit jungen Leuten besteht.
Es liegen keine randomisierten Studien vor, die den mechanischen Herzklappenersatz mit alternativen Verfahren in Bezug auf Überleben, Reoperationshäufigkeit und Lebensqualität in dieser Altersgruppe vergleichen. Als alternative Verfahren erscheinen v. a. die Ross-Operation (pulmonaler Autograft) und die Aortenklappenrekonstruktion attraktiv. Insb. mit der Ross-Operation besteht eine relativ große Erfahrung auch in der Behandlung von jungen Erwachsenen. Bis zu 10 Jahre postoperativ sind die Ergebnisse sehr gut, darüber hinaus besteht bislang leider kaum Erfahrung.
Summary
Young adults who have to undergo aortic valve surgery will frequently have (relative) contraindications to oral anticoagulation therapy because either pregnacy is planned or their life-style is very active. This review focuses on the surgical options available and assesses the literature focusing on the experience with each option obtained in young adults.
There are no randomized studies in this age group which compare mechanical aortic valve replacement with any alternative option with regard to survival, need for reoperation, or quality of life. Among the alternative techniques, the Ross-procedure (pulmonary autograft) and aortic valve repair are of special interest. With the Ross-procedure, there is a rather large experience in young adults, and the results up to 10 years postoperatively are excellent. Unfortunately, there is only limited experience with this technique beyond that time.
Literatur
-
1
Alphonso N, Baghai M, Dhital K. et al .
Midterm results of the Ross procedure.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
2004;
25
925-930
-
2
Aupart M, Babuty D, Neville P, Fauchier L, Sirinelli A, Marchand M.
Influence on age on valve related events with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
1997;
11
929-934
-
3
Bach D S, Goldman B, Verrier E. et al .
Durability and prevalence of aortic regurgitation nine years after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV stentless bioprosthesis.
J Heart Valve Dis.
2004;
13
64-72
-
4
Bach D S, Goldman B, Verrier E. et al .
Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
J Heart Valve Dis.
2002;
11
236-241
-
5
Bellhouse B J, Bellhouse F H.
Mechanism of closure of the aortic valve.
Nature.
1968;
217
86-87
-
6
Blais C, Dumesnil J G, Balloit R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P.
Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement.
Circulation.
2003;
108
983-988
-
7
Bloomfield P, Wheatley D J, Prescott R J, Miller H C.
Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
N Engl J Med.
1991;
324
573-579
-
8
Bonow R O, Carabello B, de Leon A C. et al .
ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease).
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1998;
32
1486-1588
-
9
Carr J A, Savage E B.
Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency in adults: a contemporary review and comparison with replacement techniques.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
2004;
25
6-15
-
10
Chambers J C, Somerville J, Stone S, Ross D N.
Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series.
Circulation.
1997;
96
2206-2214
-
11
David T E, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel C M, Webb G D.
Aortic valve-sparing operations in patients with aneurysms of the aortic root or ascending aorta.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2002;
74
1758-1761
-
12
David T E, Omran A, Ivanov J. et al .
Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2000;
119
210-220
-
13
Deklunder G, Roussel M, Lecroart J L, Prat A, Gautier C.
Microemboli in cerebral circulation and alteration of cognitive abilities in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.
Stroke.
1998;
29
1821-1826
-
14
Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm D H, Reichenspurner H, Reichart B.
Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2002;
50
337-341
-
15
Erasmi A W, Stierle U, Bechtel J FM, Schmidtke C, Sievers H H, Kraatz E G.
Up to 7 years’ experience with valve-sparing aortic root remodeling/reimplantation for acute type A dissection.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2003;
76
99-104
-
16
Farhat F, Lu Z, Lefevre M, Montagna P, Mikaaeloff P, Jegaden O.
Prospective comparison between total sternotomy and ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement.
J Card Surg.
2003;
18
396-401
-
17
Grunkemeier G L, Li H H, Naftel D C, Starr A, Rahimtoola S H.
Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses.
Curr Probl Cardiol.
2000;
25
73-154
-
18
Hammermeister K, Sethi G K, Henderson W G, Grover F L, Oprian C, Rahimtoola S H.
Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs Randomized Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2000;
36
1152-1158
-
19
Haydar H S, He G W, Hovaguimian H, McIrvin D M, King D H, Starr A.
Valve repair for aortic insufficiency: surgical classification and techniques.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
1997;
11
258-265
-
20
Horstkotte D, Piper C.
Improvement of oral anticoagulation therapy by INR self-management.
J Heart Valve Dis.
2004;
13
335-338
-
21
Jamieson W R, David T E, Feindel C M, Miyagishima R T, Germann E.
Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
J Heart Valve Dis.
2002;
11
424-430
-
22
Kalmár P, Irrgang E.
Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2002: A report by the Germany Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2003;
51
25-29
(blaue Seiten))
-
23
Koertke H, Minami K, Boethig D. et al .
INR self-management permits lower anticoagulation levels after mechanical heart valve replacement.
Circulation.
2003;
108
(suppl II))
II-75-II-78
-
24
Kofidis T, Fischer S, Leyh R. et al .
Clinical relevance of intracranial high intensity transient signal in patients following prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
2002;
21
22-26
-
25
Kouchoukos N T, Masetti P, Nickerson N J, Castner C F, Shannon W D, Dávila-Román V G.
The Ross procedure: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2004;
78
773-781
-
26
Laas J, Kseibi S, Perthel M, Klingbeil A, El-Ayoubi L E, Alken A.
Impact of high intensity transient signals on the choice of mechanical aortic valve substitutes.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
2003;
23
93-96
-
27
Laforest I, Dumesnil J G, Briand M, Cartier P C, Pibarot P.
Hemodynamic performance at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement: comparison of pulmonary autografts versus aortic homografts.
Circulation.
2002;
106
(suppl I))
I-57-I-62
-
28
Melina G, Mitchell A, Amrani M, Khaghani A, Yacoub M H.
Transvalvular velocities after full root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial between the homograft and the Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis.
J Heart Valve Dis.
2002;
11
54-58
-
29
Mihaljevic T, Cohn L H, Unic D, Aranki S F, Couper G S, Byrne J G.
One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: early and late results.
Ann Surg.
2004;
240
529-534
-
30
O’Brien M F, Harrocks S, Stafford E G. et al .
The homograft aortic valve: A 29-year, 99.3 % follow up of 1,022 valve replacement.
J Heart Valve Dis.
2001;
10
334-345
-
31
Oxenham H, Bloomfield P, Wheatley D J. et al .
Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Heart.
2003;
89
715-721
-
32
Pibarot P, Dumesnil J G, Briand M, Laforest I, Cartier P.
Hemodynamic performance during maximum exercise in adult patients with the Ross operation and comparison with normal controls and patients with aortic bioprosthesis.
Am J Cardiol.
2000;
86
982-988
-
33
Porter G F, Skillington P D, Bjorksten A R, Morgan J G, Yapanis A G, Grigg L E.
Exercise hemodynamic performance of the pulmonary autograft following the Ross procedure.
J Heart Valve Dis.
1999;
8
516-521
-
34
Puvimanasinghe J PA, Takkenberg J JM, Edwards M B. et al .
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.
Heart.
2004;
90
1172-1178
-
35
Rahimtoola S H.
Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2003;
41
893-904
-
36
Rao V, Jamieson W R, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David T E.
Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement.
Circulation.
2000;
102
III-5-III-9
(suppl III))
-
37
Ross D N.
Homograft replacement of the aortic valve.
Lancet.
1962;
2
487
-
38
Ross D N.
Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft.
Lancet.
1967;
2
956-958
-
39
Sabik J F, Lytle B W, Blackstone E H, Marullo A GM, Pettersson G B, Cosgrove D M.
Aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allograft for prosthetic valve endocarditis.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2002;
74
650-659
-
40
Schmidtke C, Stierle U, Sievers H H, Graf B.
Die Ross-Operation (pulmonaler Autograft) als alternativer Aortenklappenersatz.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr.
2003;
128
1759-1764
-
41
Sensky P R, Loubani M, Keal R P, Samani N J, Sosnowski A W, Galiñanes M.
Does the type of prosthesis influence early left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement? Assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.
Am Heart J.
2003;
146
E13
-
42
Sievers H H, Dahmen G, Graf B, Stierle U, Ziegler A, Schmidtke C.
Midterm results of the Ross procedure preserving the patient’s own aortic root.
Circulation.
2003;
108
(suppl II))
II-55-II-60
-
43 Sievers H H, Stierle U, Schmidtke C. 1. Jahresbericht des Deutschen Ross Registers. Lübeck [Eigendruck; zu beziehen über ambulanz@herzchirurgie.uni-luebeck.de] 2004
-
44
Takkenberg J JM, Eijkemans J C, van Herwerden L A. et al .
Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2003;
75
1482-1489
-
45
Takkenberg J JM, Eijkemans M JC, van Herweden L A. et al .
Estimated event-free life expectancy after autograft aortic root replacement in adults.
Ann Thorac Surg.
2001;
71
S344-S348
-
46
Thomson H L, O’Brien M F, Almeida A A, Tesar P J, Davison M B, Burstow D J.
Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement.
Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg.
1998;
13
572-575
-
47
Thubrikar M J, Bosher L P, Nolan S P.
The mechanism of opening the aortic valve.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1979;
77
863-870
-
48
Thubrikar M J, Nolan S P, Bosher L P, Beck J D.
The cyclic changes and structure of the base of the aortic valve.
Am Heart J.
1980;
99
217-224
-
49
Vitale N, de Feo M, de Santo L S, Pollice A, Tedesco N, Cotrufo M.
Dose-dependent fetal complications of warfarin in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1999;
33
1637-1641
-
50
Lindhoff-Last E, Schinzel H, Erbe M, Schächinger V, Bauersachs R.
Antikoagulation in der Schwangerschaft bei mechanischem Herzklappenersatz.
Z Kardiol .
2001;
90 (Suppl.6)
VI/125-VI/130
Prof. Dr. H.-H. Sievers
Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
Ratzeburger Allee 160
23538 Lübeck
Telefon: 0451/5002108
Fax: 0451/5002051
eMail: sievers@medinf.mu-luebeck.de
