Abstract
Alkoxyl radicals 9 (XO• ), generated by photolysis of thiocarbamates 8 , were found to initiate and undergo self-terminating radical oxygenations, in which alkynes are transformed into ketones. With this result, we have shown that every major class of organic O -centered radicals can act as O -atom synthon in this sequence, demonstrating the generality of this novel concept in radical chemistry. Theoretical investigations of the terminating homolytic scission of the O-X bond reveal that resonance stabilization in the cleaved radical X• (e.g. benzyl, allyl) both lowers the activation barrier, ΔE‡
, and increases the exothermicity, whereas radical stabilization by inductive effects (as in tert -butyl) only reduces ΔE‡
, compared to non-stabilized radicals. The experimental results indicate that the final homolytic bond scission is not the only crucial step in this mechanism, but that generation of XO• as well as the initial radical addition to the alkyne triple bond must be of similar importance.
Key words
radicals - alkynes - oxidations - photochemistry - computational chemistry
References
1a
Linker T.
Schmittel M.
Radikale und Radikalionen in der Organischen Synthese
Wiley-VCH;
Weinheim:
1999.
1b
Hartung J.
Suárez E.
Rodriguez MS.
Boukouvalas J.
Haynes RK. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis
Vol. 2:
Renaud P.
Sibi M.
Wiley-VCH;
Weinheim:
2001.
Chap 5.
2
Fossey J.
Lefort D.
Sorba J.
Free Radicals in Organic Chemistry
Masson;
Paris:
1995.
3 To our knowledge, rate data for the addition of alkoxyl radicals to alkynes have not been determined so far.
XO•
= NO3
• :
4a
Wille U.
Plath C.
Liebigs Ann./Recl.
1997,
111
4b
Wille U.
Lietzau L.
Tetrahedron
1999,
55:
10119
4c
Lietzau L.
Wille U.
Heterocycles
2001,
55:
377
4d
Wille U.
Chem.-Eur. J.
2002,
8:
340
4e
Stademann A.
Wille U.
Aust. J. Chem.
2004,
57:
1055
5 XO•
= SO4
-
• : Wille U.
Org. Lett.
2000,
2:
3485
6 XO
• = HO
• : Wille U.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2002,
43:
1239
7 XO
• = RC(O)O
• : Wille U.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
14
8 XO
• = ROC(O)O•
, ROC(O)C(O)O•
, R2 NC(O)O
• , R2 NO•
: Jargstorff C.
Wille U.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2003,
2173
9 The mechanism shown in Scheme 1 for NO3
• induced self-terminating radical oxygenations was verified by DFT calculations: Dreessen T.
PhD Thesis
Universität Kiel;
Germany:
2004.
Examples for the intermolecular addition of O -centered radicals to CºC triple bonds:
10a
Walling C.
Clark RT.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974,
96:
4530
10b
Walling C.
El-Taliawi G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1973,
95:
848
10c
Bottle S.
Busfield WK.
Jenkins ID.
Skelton BW.
White AH.
Rizzardo E.
Solomon DH.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1991,
1001
11 Because of the strong transannular interactions, cycloalkyne 1 had proven to be a very suitable trial horse for studying self-terminating radical oxygenations.4-8
12
Kim S.
Lim CJ.
Song S.-E.
Kang H.-Y.
Synlett
2001,
688
13 The up-scaling of photochemical reactions is normally not straight forward, because, in contrast to thermal reactions, generally a non-linear increase of both irradiation time and solvent amount is required. We have found earlier that the best way to accomplish photo-induced, self-terminating radical oxygenations on preparative scales is by accordingly increasing the amount of reaction flasks containing up to 10 mM of reactants (alkyne and radical precursor), irradiating them simultaneously and combining them for work-up.8
14 No attempt was made to separate 5 and 6 . Earlier work has shown that the products are formed with a ratio of 5 :6 = 3:1.4a
15
Frisch MJ.
Trucks GW.
Schlegel HB.
Scuseria GE.
Robb MA.
Cheeseman RR.
Montgomery JA.
Vreven T.
Kudin KN.
Burant JC.
Millam JM.
Iyengar SS.
Tomasi J.
Barone V.
Mennucci B.
Cossi M.
Scalmani G.
Rega N.
Petersson GA.
Nakatsuji H.
Hada M.
Ehara M.
Toyota K.
Fukuda R.
Hasegawa J.
Ishida M.
Nakajima T.
Honda Y.
Kitao O.
Nakai H.
Klene M.
Li X.
Knox JE.
Hratchian HP.
Cross JB.
Adamo C.
Jaramillo J.
Gomperts R.
Stratmann RE.
Yazyev O.
Austin AJ.
Cammi R.
Pomelli C.
Ochterski W.
Ayala PY.
Morokuma K.
Voth GA.
Salvador P.
Dannenberg JJ.
Zakrzewski VG.
Dapprich S.
Daniels AD.
Strain MC.
Farkas O.
Malick DK.
Rabuck AD.
Raghavachari K.
Foresman JB.
Ortiz JV.
Cui Q.
Baboul AG.
Clifford S.
Cioslowski J.
Stefanov BB.
Liu G.
Liashenko A.
Piskorz P.
Komaromi I.
Martin RL.
Fox DJ.
Keith T.
Al-Laham MA.
Peng CY.
Nanayakkara A.
Challacombe M.
Gill PMW.
Johnson B.
Chen W.
Wong MW.
Gonzalez C.
Pople JA.
Gaussian 03, Revision B.04
Gaussian, Inc.;
Pittsburgh PA:
2003.
Actually, the energy barrier for the addition of alkyl radicals to the carbonyl oxygen was calculated to be significantly higher than for the addition to the carbon site of a carbonyl bond:
16a
Hippler H.
Viskolcz B.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2002,
4:
4663
16b
Henry DJ.
Coote ML.
Gómez-Balderas R.
Radom L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004,
126:
1732
17
Henry DJ.
Parkinson CJ.
Radom L.
J. Phys. Chem. A
2002,
106:
7927 ; and literature cited therein
18 Steric repulsion by the bulky methyl substituents may be the reason for the slightly longer O-X bond in the tert -butyl substituted radical 12 .
19 A comparable result was found for the reverse addition of a methyl radical to the oxygen atom in formaldehyde, calculated at the G3MP2//B3LYP/SVP level of theory.16a
20 This is in agreement with literature, where comparison of the reaction barriers for radical reactions with these two functionals has shown the B3LYP barriers to be somewhat too low, whereas the BHandHLYP barriers are slightly too high in many cases; see for example: Wang Y.
Grimme S.
Zipse H.
J. Phys. Chem. A
2004,
108:
2324
21 BHandHLYP calculations performed with the cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVDZ and cc-pVTZ basis set, respectively, resulted in comparable results for ΔE‡
and ΔE than obtained with the 6-311G** basis set. MP2 calculations with these basis sets generally reflected the results of the B3LYP method.