Semin intervent Radiol 2005; 22(1): 10-14
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-869571
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical Interventional Radiology: Parallels with the Evolution of General Surgery

Gregory M. Soares1 , Timothy P. Murphy1
  • 1Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
12. Mai 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT

Parallels between the evolution of surgery into an accepted clinical specialty and changes in the practice of interventional radiology (IR) have been drawn. Technical advances have mandated a change in the role of interventional radiologists from diagnostic radiologist to that of the treating physician. The development of “modern” IR is an accelerated repetition of the evolution of “modern” clinical surgery. The resistance or delay of some to accept IR as a clinical specialty is a duplication of the resistance to accept surgery as a clinical specialty by medicine in general. It is clearly time to understand that the benefits the interventional radiologist brings to the patient far exceed his ability to synthesize imaging data with catheter skills. Those of us who have accepted this can take some comfort in the fact that we now tread a path already proven in its destination.

REFERENCES

Timothy P MurphyM.D. F.S.I.R. F.A.H.A. F.S.V.M.B. 

Associate Professor of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown Medical School

Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street

Providence, RI 02903