Information Required to Provide Informed Consent for Endoscopy: an Observational Study of Patients’ Expectations

Background and Study Aims: The aim of this study was to determine how much information patients require about the risk of complications in order to provide informed consent to undergo endoscopy.
Patients and Methods: Endoscopic complications and their consequences were discussed with consecutive patients who had undergone endoscopy. The patients were asked how common each complication would have to be for them to require information about the complication before providing adequately informed consent.
Results: Data were obtained from 150 gastroscopy patients (51 % male, median age 55.5 years) and 150 colonoscopy patients (60 % male, median age 54.4 years). Patients in both groups were more likely to want to know about major rather than minor complications at a lower level of risk (P < 0.001 at a risk greater than one in 1000). Similar proportions of gastroscopy patients (n = 29, 19 %) and colonoscopy patients (n = 21, 14 %) wanted to know about all possible complications, no matter how inconsequential or rare. Colonoscopy patients were less likely to want no information about any complications than gastroscopy patients (n = 1, 0.7 % and n = 15, 10 %, respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The information patients require in order to provide informed consent is very variable. Many appear to make a judgement about the need for information depending on the perceived severity of the complication, but some want information about all complications, irrespective of risk and severity. The level of risk at which they require this information is likely to be higher than the level used by doctors who are obtaining consent from patients. The process may be improved by providing procedure-specific information leaflets that offer information regarding common and serious complications.

References

• 1 Gillon R. Consent.  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;  291 1700-1701
• 2 Skene L, Smallwood R. Informed consent: lessons from Australia.  BMJ. 2002;  324 39-41
• 3 Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee, Queen’s Bench Division, Royal Courts of Justice .London; 1957: 1 WLR 582
• 4 Canterbury v. Spence, US Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit .1972: 464 F2d 772,775 (DC Cir 1972)
• 5 Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital and Others, House of Lords .London; 1985: AC 871 (1985), 1 All ER 643 (1985), 2 WLR 480
• 6 Rogers v. Whitaker, High Court of Australia .Canberra; 1992: 175 CLR 479
• 7 Feld A D. Informed consent: not just for procedures anymore.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 977-980
• 8 Strull W M, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?.  JAMA. 1984;  252 2990-2994
• 9 Levy N, Landmann L, Stermer E. et al . Does a detailed explanation prior to gastroscopy reduce the patient’s anxiety?.  Endoscopy. 1989;  21 263-265
• 10 Mayberry M K, Mayberry J F. Towards better informed consent in endoscopy: a study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;  13 1467-1476
• 11 Quine M A, Bell G D, McCloy R F. et al . Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing and sedation methods.  Gut. 1995;  36 462-423
• 12 Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.  BMJ. 2002;  324 827-830
• 13 Paling J. Strategies to help patients understand risks.  BMJ. 2003;  327 745-748
• 14 Dominitz J A, Eisen G M, Baron T H. et al . Complications of colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 441-445
• 15 British Society of Gastroenterology .Guidelines for informed consent for endoscopic procedures. London; British Society of Gastroenterology (http://www.bsg.org.uk/clinical_prac/guidelines/consent.htm) 1999
• 16 Mayberry M K, Mayberry J F. Consent with understanding: a movement towards informed decisions.  Clin Med. 2002;  2 523-526
• 17 Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry .Learning from Bristol: the report of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary, 1984 - 1995. Bristol; Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry (Command Paper CM 5207; http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/)