Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870336
Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts: Long-Term Outcome and Procedural Factors Associated with Safe and Successful Treatment
Publication History
Submitted 4 April 2004
Accepted after Revision 15 April 2005
Publication Date:
27 September 2005 (online)
Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic drainage is a widely used treatment modality for pancreatic pseudocysts and has challenged more traditional drainage techniques. This retrospective study evaluates the short-term and long-term results with this technique and aims to identify procedural modifications that may improve its safety and efficacy.
Patients and Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in our hospital between 1983 and 2000 were included in the study. The patients’ charts were reviewed, and long-term follow-up data were obtained by written questionnaires sent to the patients at the end of the follow-up period in November 2002.
Results: A total of 92 patients were included (66 men, 26 women; median age 49 years). The technical success rate of the drainage procedure was 97 % and the mortality rate was 1 %. Complications occurred in 31 patients (34 %), eight of which (9 %) were major and required surgery: hemorrhage in four cases (three of which were caused by erosion of a straight endoprosthesis through the cyst wall), secondary infection in three, and perforation in one. During a median follow-up period of 43 months, 10 patients (11 %) underwent additional (nonendoscopic) treatment for a persistent cyst and five (5 %) for a recurrent cyst. Overall, endoscopic drainage was successful in 65 patients (71 %).
Conclusions: Endoscopic drainage is an effective treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts and offers a definitive solution in almost three-quarters of the cases. The majority of major complications might have been prevented by using pigtail stents instead of straight stents and by taking a more aggressive approach to the prevention and treatment of secondary cyst infection.
References
- 1 Beckingham I J, Krige J E, Bornman P C, Terblanche J. Long term outcome of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94 71-74
- 2 Barthet M, Bugallo M, Moreira L S. et al . Management of cysts and pseudocysts complicating chronic pancreatitis: a retrospective study of 143 patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1993; 17 270-276
- 3 Baillie J. Pancreatic pseudocysts (part I). Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59 873-879
- 4 Gouyon B, Levy P, Ruszniewski P. et al . Predictive factors in the outcome of pseudocysts complicating alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Gut. 1997; 41 821-825
- 5 Vitas G J, Sarr M G. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery. 1992; 111 123-130
- 6 Beebe D S, Bubrick M P, Onstad G R, Hitchcock C R. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984; 159 562-564
- 7 Yeo C J, Bastidas J A, Lynch-Nyhan A. et al . The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990; 170 411-417
- 8 Lehman G A. Pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 49 S81-S84
- 9 Adkisson K W, Baron T H, Morgan D E. Pancreatic fluid collections: diagnosis and endoscopic management. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 1998; 9 61-72
- 10 Boerma D, van Gulik T M, Obertop H, Gouma D J. Internal drainage of infected pancreatic pseudocysts: safe or sorry?. Dig Surg. 1999; 16 501-505
- 11 Lohr-Happe A, Peiper M, Lankisch P G. Natural course of operated pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. Gut. 1994; 35 1479-1482
- 12 Gumaste U V, Dave P B. Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: the needle or the scalpel?. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991; 13 500-505
- 13 Hancke S, Pedersen J F. Percutaneous pancreatic cyst puncture guided by ultrasound. (in Danish). Ugeskr Laeger. 1977; 139 700-701
- 14 Spivak H, Galloway J R, Amerson J R. et al . Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186 507-511
- 15 Boggi U, di Candio G, Campatelli A. et al . Nonoperative management of pancreatic pseudocysts: problems in differential diagnosis. Int J Pancreatol. 1999; 25 123-133
- 16 Vitale G C, Lawhon J C, Larson G M. et al . Endoscopic drainage of the pancreatic pseudocyst. Surgery. 1999; 126 616-621
- 17 Singer M V, Gyr K, Sarles H. Revised classification of pancreatitis. Report of the Second International Symposium on the Classification of Pancreatitis in Marseille, France, March 28 - 30, 1984. Gastroenterology. 1985; 89 683-685
- 18 Balthazar E J. Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology. 2002; 223 603-613
- 19 Baron T H, Harewood G C, Morgan D E, Yates M R. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56 7-17
- 20 De Palma G D, Galloro G, Puzziello A. et al . Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a long-term follow-up study of 49 patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002; 49 1113-1115
- 21 Sharma S S, Bhargawa N, Govil A. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst: a long-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2002; 34 203-207
- 22 Cremer M, Devière J, Engelholm L. Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: long-term follow-up after 7 years of experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989; 35 1-9
- 23 Binmoeller K F, Seifert H, Walter A, Soehendra N. Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42 219-224
- 24 Catalano M F, Geenen J E, Schmalz M J. et al . Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct endoprosthesis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42 214-218
- 25 Barthet M, Sahel J, Bodiou-Bertei C, Bernard J P. Endoscopic transpapillary drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42 208-213
- 26 Clark L A, Pappas T N. Long term outcome of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94 8-9
- 27 Gerolami R, Giovannini M, Laugier R. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts guided by endosonography. Endoscopy. 1997; 29 106-108
- 28 Giovannini M, Binmoeller K, Seifert H. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cystogastrostomy. Endoscopy. 2003; 35 239-245
- 29 Smits M E, Rauws E A, Tytgat G N, Huibregtse K. The efficacy of endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 42 202-207
- 30 Beckingham I J, Krige J E, Bornman P C, Terblanche J. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg. 1997; 84 1638-1645
- 31 Baillie J. Pancreatic pseudocysts (Part II). Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60 105-113
- 32 Harewood G C, Wright C A, Baron T H. Impact on patient outcomes of experience in the performance of endoscopic pancreatic fluid collection drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58 230-235
- 33 Heider R, Meyer A A, Galanko J A, Behrns K E. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients. Ann Surg. 1999; 229 781-787
- 34 Pavlovsky M, Perejaslov A, Chooklin S, Dovgan Y. Current management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998; 45 846-848
D. L. Cahen , M. D.
Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Academic Medical Center · Meibergdreef 9 · 1105 AZ Amsterdam · The Netherlands
Fax: +31-20-6917033
Email: d.l.cahen@amc.uva.nl