Quantitative Analysis of the Microvascular Architecture Observed on Magnification Endoscopy in Cancerous and Benign Gastric Lesions

Background and Study Aims: Gastric cancer remains a common malignant tumor in Japan. The aim of this study was to attempt a quantitative evaluation of the microvascular architecture observed by magnification endoscopy using image analysis, and to investigate whether this method is able to distinguish between gastric cancers and benign lesions.
Patients and Methods: A total of 132 patients were studied using magnification endoscopy, and image analysis was performed in 71 patients (32 patients with early gastric cancer, 39 patients with benign lesions). Analysis was not possible in the other 61 patients because the quality of the image was not good enough. A square region of interest was selected from the magnified images of the gastric mucosa. From this we extracted the vascular images corresponding to microvessels and calculated the mean caliber of vessels in the region of interest.
Results: Image analysis provided good-quality images of microvessels and enabled evaluation of the microvascular architecture. The mean caliber of vessels was 4.454 pixels in 17 differentiated adenocarcinomas, 4.319 pixels in 15 undifferentiated adenocarcinomas, and 4.034 pixels in the 39 benign lesions. This represented a significant difference between gastric cancers and benign lesions (P < 0.0001). Histopathological investigation of surgically resected tumors demonstrated the mean caliber of microvessels in cancerous lesions to be greater than that of microvessels in the surrounding mucosa.
Conclusions: Image analysis was useful for evaluating the microvascular architecture of the gastric mucosa, and calculation of the mean caliber of the vessels may prove helpful in the differential diagnosis of gastric cancers. However, analysis was not possible in 61 of the 132 patients studied because of inadequate image quality, and this represents a significant limitation of this diagnostic method.

References

• 1 Moreto M. Diagnosis of esophagogastric tumors.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 36-42
• 2 Kida M, Kobayashi K, Saigenji K. Routine chromoendoscopy for gastrointestinal diseases: indications revised.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 590-596
• 3 Takemoto T, Sakaki N. Magnification endoscopy. In: Sivak MV Gastroenterological endoscopy. Philadelphia; Saunders 2000: 165-175
• 4 Cales P, Oberti F, Delmotte J S. et al . Gastric mucosal surface in cirrhosis evaluated by magnifying endoscopy and scanning electronic microscopy.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 614-623
• 5 Yagi K, Nakamura A, Sekine A. Comparison between magnifying endoscopy and histological, culture and urease test findings from the gastric mucosa of the corpus.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 376-381
• 6 Otsuka Y, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N. et al . Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 165-169
• 7 Tobita K. Study on minute surface structures of the depressed-type early gastric cancer with magnifying endoscopy.  Dig Endosc. 2001;  13 121-126
• 8 Tajiri H, Doi T, Endo H. et al . Routine endoscopy using magnifying endoscope for gastric cancer diagnosis.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 772-777
• 9 Kiesslish R, Jung M. Magnification endoscopy: does it improve mucosal surface analysis for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplasias?.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 819-822
• 10 Dinis-Ribeiro M, Costa-Pereira A, Lopes C. et al . Magnification chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 498-504
• 11 Yao K, Oishi T, Matsui T. et al . Novel magnified endoscopic findings of microvascular architecture in intramucosal gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 279-284
• 12 Yao K, Yao T, Matsui T. et al . Hemoglobin content in intramucosal gastric carcinoma as a marker of histologic differentiation: a clinical application of quantitative electronic endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 241-245
• 13 Sakaki N, Iida Y, Okazaki Y. et al . Magnifying endoscopic observation of gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis.  Endoscopy. 1978;  10 269-274
• 14 Okada T, Nishizawa M. Magnified observation of elevated lesions of the stomach based on magnifying fiberoptic endoscopy and dissecting microscopy.  Endoscopy. 1981;  13 192-196
• 15 Nishizawa M, Okada T. Magnified observation of elevated borderline lesions (adenoma) of the stomach based on dissecting microscopy and magnifying fiberoptic endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1981;  13 234-237
• 16 Shibuya K, Hoshino H, Chiyo M. et al . Subepithelial vascular patterns in bronchial dysplasias using a high magnification bronchovideoscope.  Thorax. 2002;  57 902-907
• 17 Adachi Y, Mori M, Enjoji M. Microvascular architecture of early gastric carcinoma.  Cancer. 1993;  72 32-36
• 18 Kumagai Y, Inoue Y, Nagai K. et al . Magnifying endoscopy, stereoscopic microscopy, and the microvascular architecture of superficial esophageal carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 364-375
• 19 Konerding M A, Fait E, Gaumann A. 3D microvascular architecture of pre-cancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas of the colon.  Br J Cancer. 2001;  84 1354-1362