Indirect MR Arthrography: Concepts and Controversies

ABSTRACT

Indirect MR arthrography involves intravenous injection of a standard dose of Gadolinium contrast followed, in delayed fashion, by MR imaging. Contrast in taken up by the joint at a rate dependent on a variety of factors including synovial area, vascularity, permeability, and pre-existing joint effusion. Patient acceptance is higher than with direct intra-articular injection, and logical considerations (e.g., not needing a radiologist present) make this an attractive alternative to direct MR arthrography. At best, an indirect MR arthrography exam can look virtually identical to a direct MR arthrogram. However, the radiologist should be aware that vascular tissue inside and outside the joint will enhance, which may be considered either an advantage or disadvantage. Additionally, since all compartments of the joint enhance, information regarding abnormal communication of contrast material is absent. Suboptimal exams occur due to the need for diffusion of contrast into the joint. Exercise can help improve the quality of exams. Using an adequate time delay is essential for optimizing indirect MR arthrography.

KEYWORDS

MR arthrography - Gadolinium - contrast - internal derangement - joints

REFERENCES

• 1 Brossmann J, Preidler K W, Daenen B et al.. Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthrography in cadavers.  Radiology. 1996;  200 509-517
• 2 Winalski C S, Aliabadi P, Wright R J, Shortkroff S, Sledge C B, Weissman B N. Enhancement of joint fluid with intravenously administered gadopentetate dimeglumine: technique, rationale, and implications.  Radiology. 1993;  187 179-185
• 3 Schweitzer M E, Natale P, Winalski C S, Culp R. Indirect wrist MR arthrography: the effects of passive motion versus active exercise.  Skeletal Radiol. 2000;  29 10-14
• 4 Weishaupt D, Schweitzer M E, Rawool N M et al.. Indirect MR arthrography of the knee: effects of low-intensity ultrasound on the diffusion rate of intravenously administered Gd-DTPA in healthy volunteers.  Invest Radiol. 2001;  36 493-499
• 5 Vahlensieck M, Peterfy C G, Wischer T et al.. Indirect MR arthrography: optimization and clinical applications.  Radiology. 1996;  200 249-254
• 6 White L M, Schweitzer M E, Weishaupt D, Kramer J, Davis A, Marks P H. Diagnosis of recurrent meniscal tears: prospective evaluation of conventional MR imaging, indirect MR arthrography, and direct MR arthrography.  Radiology. 2002;  222 421-429
• 7 Wagner S C, Schweitzer M E, Morrison W B, Fenlin Jr J M, Bartolozzi A R. Shoulder instability: accuracy of MR imaging performed after surgery in depicting recurrent injury-initial findings.  Radiology. 2002;  222 196-203
• 8 Yagci B, Manisali M, Yilmaz E et al.. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder in detection of rotator cuff ruptures.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 258-262
• 9 Allmann K H, Schafer O, Hauer M et al.. Indirect MR arthrography of the unexercised glenohumeral joint in patients with rotator cuff tears.  Invest Radiol. 1999;  34 435-440
• 10 Haims A H, Schweitzer M E, Morrison W B et al.. Internal derangement of the wrist: indirect MR arthrography versus unenhanced MR imaging.  Radiology. 2003;  227 701-707
• 11 Wintzell G, Larsson H, Larsson S. Indirect MR arthrography of anterior shoulder instability in the ABER and the apprehension test positions: a prospective comparative study of two different shoulder positions during MRI using intravenous gadodiamide contrast for enhancement of the joint fluid.  Skeletal Radiol. 1998;  27 488-494
• 12 Hantes M E, Zachos V C, Zibis A H et al.. Evaluation of meniscal repair with serial magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study between conventional MRI and indirect MR arthrography.  Eur J Radiol. 2004;  50 231-237