Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2005; 9(2): 161-172
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-872341
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Controversies in Protocol Selection in the Imaging of Articular Cartilage

Garry E. Gold1 , Brian A. Hargreaves2 , Scott B. Reeder1 , Shreyas S. Vasanawala1 , Christopher F. Beaulieu1
  • 1Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 July 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, with its unique ability to noninvasively image and characterize soft tissue, has shown promise in assessment of cartilage. The development of new, fast imaging methods with high contrast will improve the MR evaluation of cartilage morphology. In addition to morphological MR imaging methods, MR imaging contrast mechanisms under development may reveal detailed information regarding the physiology of cartilage. However, many of these methods remain to be tested in the clinical setting. Protocol selection for cartilage imaging requires understanding of the patient population and the advantages and limitations of these techniques.

KEYWORDS

Cartilage - protocol - MRI

REFERENCES

  • 1 Swedberg J A, Steinbauer J R. Osteoarthritis.  Am Fam Physician. 1992;  45 557-568
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Brandt K D. Osteoarthritis.  Clin Geriatr Med. 1988;  4 279-293
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Davis M A. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis.  Clin Geriatr Med. 1988;  4 241-255
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Peyron J G. Epidemiological aspects of osteoarthritis.  Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1988;  77 29-33
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Sangha O. Epidemiology of rheumatic diseases.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;  39(Suppl 2) 3-12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Poole A R. An introduction to the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis.  Front Biosci. 1999;  4 D662-D670
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Roos H, Adalberth T, Dahlberg L, Lohmander L S. Osteoarthritis of the knee after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament or meniscus: the influence of time and age.  Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995;  3 261-267
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 van den Berg W B. Pathophysiology of osteoarthritis.  Joint Bone Spine. 2000;  67 555-556
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gold G E, Bergman A G, Pauly J M et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage repair.  Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;  9 377-392
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Boegard T, Jonsson K. Radiography in osteoarthritis of the knee.  Skeletal Radiol. 1999;  28 605-615
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Coumas J M, Palmer W E. Knee arthrography. Evolution and current status.  Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;  36 703-728
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Disler D G, Recht M P, McCauley T R. MR imaging of articular cartilage.  Skeletal Radiol. 2000;  29 367-377
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Hodler J, Resnick D. Current status of imaging of articular cartilage.  Skeletal Radiol. 1996;  25 703-709
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 McCauley T R, Disler D G. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;  9 2-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Recht M P, Resnick D. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: an overview.  Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;  9 328-336
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Gold G E, McCauley T R, Gray M L, Disler D G. What's new in cartilage?.  Radiographics. 2003;  23 1227-1242
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Rubenstein J D, Li J G, Majumdar S, Henkelman R M. Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;  169 1089-1096
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Meyer C H, Pauly J M, Macovski A, Nishimura D G. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation.  Magn Reson Med. 1990;  15 287-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Eckstein F, Winzheimer M, Westhoff J et al.. Quantitative relationships of normal cartilage volumes of the human knee joint-assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.  Anat Embryol (Berl). 1998;  197 383-390
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Asbeutah A, Morris K, Stuckey S. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume.  J Orthop Res. 2000;  18 580-584
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Disler D G. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;  169 1117-1123
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Recht M P, Piraino D W, Paletta G A, Schils J P, Belhobek G H. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.  Radiology. 1996;  198 209-212
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wang S F, Cheng H C, Chang C Y. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging: a modified FS 3D SPGR technique for assessment of patellofemoral joint chondromalacia.  Clin Imaging. 1999;  23 177-180
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Becker E D, Farrar T C. Driven equilibrium Fourier transform spectroscopy. A new method for nuclear magnetic resonance signal enhancement.  J Am Chem Soc. 1969;  91 7784-7785
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hargreaves B A, Gold G E, Lang P K et al.. MR imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium.  Magn Reson Med. 1999;  42 695-703
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Escobedo E M, Hunter J C, Zink-Brody G C, Wilson A J, Harrison S D, Fisher D J. Usefulness of turbo spin-echo MR imaging in the evaluation of meniscal tears: comparison with a conventional spin-echo sequence.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  167 1223-1227
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Eckstein F, Sittek H, Milz S, Putz R, Reiser M. The morphology of articular cartilage assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Reproducibility and anatomical correlation.  Surg Radiol Anat. 1994;  16 429-438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hardy P A, Recht M P, Piraino D, Thomasson D. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;  6 329-335
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ruehm S, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J. MRI of patellar articular cartilage: evaluation of an optimized gradient echo sequence (3D-DESS).  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;  8 1246-1251
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Mosher T J, Pruett S W. Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;  10 178-182
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Reeder S B, Wen Z, Yu H et al.. Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least-squares estimation method.  Magn Reson Med. 2004;  51 35-45
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Reeder S B, Pineda A R, Wen Z et al.. Iterative “Dixon” water-fat separation with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL): application to fast spin-echo imaging.  Magn Reson Med. 2005;  , In press
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Menick B J, Bobman S A, Listerud J, Atlas S W. Thin-section, three-dimensional Fourier transform, steady-state free precession MR imaging of the brain.  Radiology. 1992;  183 369-377
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Duerk J L, Lewin J S, Wendt M, Petersilge C. Remember true FISP? A high SNR, near 1-second imaging method for T2-like contrast in interventional MRI at 2 T.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;  8 203-208
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Vasnawala S S, Pauly J M, Nishimura D G, Gold G E. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.  Skeletal Radiol. 2002;  31 574-580
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Hargreaves B A, Gold G E, Beaulieu C F, Vasanawala S S, Nishimura D G, Pauly J M. Comparison of new sequences for high-resolution cartilage imaging.  Magn Reson Med. 2003;  49 700-709
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Vasanawala S S, Pauly J M, Nishimura D G. Fluctuating equilibrium MRI.  Magn Reson Med. 1999;  42 876-883
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Vasanawala S S, Pauly J M, Nishimura D G. Linear combination steady-state free precession MRI.  Magn Reson Med. 2000;  43 82-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Scheffler K, Heid O, Hennig J. Magnetization preparation during the steady state: fat-saturated 3D TrueFISP.  Magn Reson Med. 2001;  45 1075-1080
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Hargreaves B A, Vasanawala S S, Pauly J M, Nishimura D G. Characterization and reduction of the transient response in steady-state MR imaging.  Magn Reson Med. 2001;  46 149-158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Reeder S B, Pelc N J, Alley M T, Gold G E. Rapid MR imaging of articular cartilage with steady-state free precession and multipoint fat-water separation.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;  180 357-362
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Reeder S B, Hargreaves B A, Brittain J H. Homodyne reconstruction with IDEAL (Dixon) water-fat decomposition.  Magn Reson Med. 2005;  , In press
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Reeder S B, Herzka D A, McVeigh E R. Signal-to-noise ratio behavior of steady-state free precession.  Magn Reson Med. 2004;  52 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Hargreaves B A, Vasanawala S S, Nayak K S, Hu B S, Nishimura D G. Fat-suppressed steady-state free precession imaging using phase detection.  Magn Reson Med. 2003;  50 210-213
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Poon C S, Henkelman R M. Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;  2 541-553
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Smith H E, Mosher T J, Dardzinski B J et al.. Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;  14 50-55
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Dardzinski B J, Mosher T J, Li S, Van Slyke M A, Smith M B. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage.  Radiology. 1997;  205 546-550
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Goodwin D W, Wadghiri Y Z, Dunn J F. Micro-imaging of articular cartilage: T2, proton density, and the magic angle effect.  Acad Radiol. 1998;  5 790-798
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Mosher T J, Dardzinski B J, Smith M B. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2-preliminary findings at 3 T.  Radiology. 2000;  214 259-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Grunder W, Wagner M, Werner A. MR-microscopic visualization of anisotropic internal cartilage structures using the magic angle technique.  Magn Reson Med. 1998;  39 376-382
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Henkelman R M, Stanisz G J, Kim J K, Bronskill M J. Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues.  Magn Reson Med. 1994;  32 592-601
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Xia Y. Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: a review.  Invest Radiol. 2000;  35 602-621
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Kneeland J B. MRI probes biophysical structure of cartilage.  Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1996;  18 36-40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Xia Y, Farquhar T, Burton-Wurster N, Lust G. Origin of cartilage laminae in MRI.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;  7 887-894
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Burstein D, Gray M L, Hartman A L, Gipe R, Foy B D. Diffusion of small solutes in cartilage as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and imaging.  J Orthop Res. 1993;  11 465-478
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Butts K, Pauly J, de Crespigny A, Moseley M. Isotropic diffusion-weighted and spiral-navigated interleaved EPI for routine imaging of acute stroke.  Magn Reson Med. 1997;  38 741-749
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Xia Y, Farquhar T, Burton-Wurster N, Vernier-Singer M, Lust G, Jelinski L W. Self-diffusion monitors degraded cartilage.  Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;  323 323-328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Miller K L, Hargreaves B A, Gold G E, Pauly J M. Steady state diffusion imaging of knee cartilage.  Magn Reson Med. 2004;  51 394-398
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Shapiro E M, Borthakur A, Dandora R, Kriss A, Leigh J S, Reddy R. Sodium visibility and quantitation in intact bovine articular cartilage using high field (23)Na MRI and MRS.  J Magn Reson. 2000;  142 24-31
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Reddy R, Insko E K, Noyszewski E A, Dandora R, Kneeland J B, Leigh J S. Sodium MRI of human articular cartilage in vivo.  Magn Reson Med. 1998;  39 697-701
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Boada F E, Shen G X, Chang S Y, Thulborn K R. Spectrally weighted twisted projection imaging: reducing T2 signal attenuation effects in fast three-dimensional sodium imaging.  Magn Reson Med. 1997;  38 1022-1028
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Borthakur A, Shapiro E M, Beers J, Kudchodkar S, Kneeland J B, Reddy R. Sensitivity of MRI to proteoglycan depletion in cartilage: comparison of sodium and proton MRI.  Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2000;  8 288-293
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Hancu I, Boada F E, Shen G X. Three-dimensional triple-quantum-filtered (23)Na imaging of in vivo human brain.  Magn Reson Med. 1999;  42 1146-1154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Tiderius C JJC, Leander P, Olsson I E, Ekberg O, Dahlberg I. Gadolinium enhanced MRI indicates a relationship between physical exercise and human knee cartilage structure. In: Proceedings of the 48th Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2002: abstract 0362
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 65 Tiderius C J, Olsson L E, de Verdier H, Leander P, Ekberg O, Dahlberg L. Gd-DTPA2-enhanced MRI of femoral knee cartilage: a dose-response study in healthy volunteers.  Magn Reson Med. 2001;  46 1067-1071
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Kim Y JIC, Millis M B, Jaramillo D, Gray M L, Burstein D. Assessment of early osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia and pelvic osteotomy using delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC). In: Proceedings International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Honolulu, HI; ISMRM 2002
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 67 Stevens K JBF, Hishioka H, Steines D, Genovese M, Lang P K. Contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of GAG concentrations in articular cartilage of knees with early osteoarthritis. In: Proceedings Radiol Soc of North America Chicago, IL; Radiological Society of North America 2001: 275
    Search in Google Scholar

Garry E GoldM.D. 

300 Pasteur Drive S0-68B, Stanford, CA 94305-5105