PDF herunterladen
Aktuelle Traumatol 2005; 35(6): 320-327
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-872995
Originalarbeit

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der zementfreie CLS-Titangeradschaft - Langzeitergebnisse, Indikationen und Limitationen

The Uncemented CLS Femoral Component - Long-Term Results, Indications and LimitationsP. R. Aldinger1 , A. W. Jung1 , D. Parsch1 , S. J. Breusch1
  • 1Stiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Heidelberg
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
02. Januar 2006 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Seit 1985 wird der zementfreie CLS-Geradschaft implantiert und ist mittlerweile mit über 350 000 Implantationen einer der am häufigsten implantierten zementfreien Schäfte in Europa. Selbst bei schwierigen anatomischen Verhältnissen und in den Händen von verschiedenen Operateuren mit unterschiedlichem Ausbildungsstand hat sich die femorale Versorgung mit diesem System bewährt. In diesem Beitrag sollen die Langzeitergebnisse, Indikationen und Limitationen mit diesem zementfreien, korundgestrahlten Titangeradschaft nach bis zu 20 Jahren dargestellt werden. Die Implantation des zementfreien Geradschaftes ist aus der Sicht der Autoren deutlich einfacher und weniger anfällig für technische Fehler als ein gut zementierter Prothesenschaft und bietet damit verlässlichere und konsistentere Langzeitergebnisse selbst bei schwierigen Deformitäten.

Abstract

The uncemented CLS stem has been in clinical use since 1985. With over 350 000 implantations it has become one of the most frequently implanted uncemented femoral hip stems in Europe. Even in femoral deformities and in the hands of surgeons with differing levels of surgical training the long term results have been demonstrated to be outstanding. In this article the long term results, indications and limitations of a straight corundum blasted titanium femoral component with a follow-up up to 20 years are discussed. The insertion of an uncemented straight femoral component is a lot simpler and susceptible to less sources of error than a well cemented hip stem. It can provide more consistent and durable results even in femoral deformities.

Literatur

  • 1 Aldinger P R. et al . A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2003;  85 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aldinger P R. et al .Sinn und Unsinn der Individualprothese. Endoprothetik Forum Münster. 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Aldinger P R. et al . Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA.  Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;  73 115-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Aldinger P R. et al . Long-term fate of uncemented, threaded acetabular components with smooth surface treatment: minimum 10-year follow-up of two different designs.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;  124 469-475
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Aldinger P R. et al . Cementless Spotorno tapered titanium stems: excellent 10 - 15-year survival in 141 young patients.  Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;  74 253-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Birrell F, Johnell O, Silman A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;  58 569-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Blasius K. et al . CLS Multicenter Studie - 8-Jahres-Ergebnisse.  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1993;  131 547-552
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bourne R B. The planning and implementation of the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry.  Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999;  58 128-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bourne R B, Rorabeck C H. Assessing the outcomes: what really works?.  Orthopedics. 1999;  22 823-825
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bourne R B. et al . Tapered titanium cementless total hip replacements: a 10- to 13-year follow-up study.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;  112-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Breusch S J. et al . Verankerungsprinzipien in der Hüftendoprothetik. I: Der Hüftschaft.  Unfallchirurg. 2000;  103 918-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Breusch S J. et al . Ten-year results of uncemented hip stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;  125 304-309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Britton A R. et al . Pain levels after total hip replacement: their use as endpoints for survival analysis.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1997;  79 93-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Callaghan J J. et al . Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2000;  82 487-497
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Capello W N. et al . Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. A concise follow-up of a previous report.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2003;  85-A 885-889
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Capello W N. et al . Hydroxyapatite in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical results and critical issues.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;  200-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1972;  54 61-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Clohisy J C, Harris W H. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1999;  81 66-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Clohisy J C, Harris W H. The Harris-Galante uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement at 10 years.  J Arthroplasty. 1999;  14 915-917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Clohisy J C, Harris W H. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1999;  81 247-255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 D'Antonio J A. et al . Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty: 10- to 13-year followup.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;  101-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Della Valle C J, Paprosky W G. The middle-aged patient with hip arthritis: the case for extensively coated stems.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;  101-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Duffy G P. et al . Primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients < 40 years old: 10- to 14-year results using first-generation proximally porous-coated implants.  J Arthroplasty. 2001;  16 140-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Effenberger H. et al . Anatomically adapted, HA coated SBG stem - ten years of successful implantation.  Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004;  49 290-294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Emery D. et al . The Stanmore total hip arthroplasty. A 15- to 20-year follow-up study.  J Arthroplasty. 1997;  12 728-735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Engh C A, Bobyn J D. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;  231 7-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Glassman A H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1987;  69 45-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Engh C A. et al . Porous-coated total hip replacement.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;  298 89-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Engh Jr C A, Hopper R H. The odyssey of porous-coated fixation.  J Arthroplasty. 2002;  17 102-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Engh Jr C A. et al . Long-term results using the anatomic medullary locking hip prosthesis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;  393 137-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Frankel S. et al . Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study.  Lancet. 1999;  353 1304-1309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Garcia-Cimbrelo E. et al . Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymuller Alloclassic system. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2003;  85 296-303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Grant P, Nordsletten L. Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2004;  86 2636-2641
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Grubl A. et al . Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup: a minimum ten-year follow-up.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2002;  84 425-431
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Grubl A. et al . 6 - 10 Jahresergebnisse der Alloclassic Hüftendoprothese - eine Multicenterstudie.  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003;  141 303-308
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Haddad Jr R J. et al . Clinical and roentgenographic evaluation of noncemented porous-coated anatomic medullary locking (AML) and porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip arthroplasties.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;  176-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Harris W H. Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty secondary to osteolysis induced by wear debris from titanium-alloy modular femoral heads.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1991;  73 470-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Jasty M. et al . Etiology of osteolysis around porous-coated cementless total hip arthroplasties.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;  111-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Jasty M. et al . Wear of polyethylene acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. An analysis of one hundred and twenty-eight components retrieved at autopsy or revision operations.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1997;  79 349-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Karrholm J. et al . Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4 - 7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1994;  76 912-917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kim Y G. et al . Uncemented Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A 10 - 16-year follow-up study.  Acta Orthop Scand. 2005;  76 42-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kim Y H, Kim J S, Cho S H. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 10- to 12-year results of prospective and consecutive series.  J Arthroplasty. 1999;  14 538-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kim Y H, Kim J S, Cho S H. Primary total hip arthroplasty with the AML total hip prosthesis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;  147-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kim Y H. et al . Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2003;  85 1682-1688
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Krismer M. et al . The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA‐FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse - femoral component analysis.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1999;  81 273-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Mallory T H. et al . Minimal 10-year results of a tapered cementless femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2001;  16 (Suppl) 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 McAuley J P. et al . Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;  418 119-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 McLaughlin J R, Lee K R. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients. 8- to 13-year results using an uncemented stem.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;  373 153-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 McNally S A. et al . The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2000;  82 378-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Meding J B. et al . Minimum ten-year follow-up of a straight-stemmed, plasma-sprayed, titanium-alloy, uncemented femoral component in primary total hip arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2004;  86 92-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Morscher E. Experiences, requirements and development of cement-free hip endoprostheses.  Orthopäde. 1987;  16 185-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Murray D W, Carr A J, Bulstrode C J. Which primary total hip replacement?.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1995;  77 520-527
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Nercessian O A, Wu W H, Sarkissian H. Clinical and radiographic results of cementless AML total hip arthroplasty in young patients.  J Arthroplasty. 2001;  16 312-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Neumann L, Freund K G, Sorenson K H. Long-term results of Charnley total hip replacement. Review of 92 patients at 15 to 20 years.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1994;  76 245-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Nunn D. et al . The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1989;  71 629-631
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Parvizi J. et al . Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long-term study of the Taperloc stem.  J Arthroplasty. 2004;  19 151-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Parvizi J. et al . Fifteen-year clinical survivorship of Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2004;  19 672-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Reitman R D. et al . Thirteen year results of total hip arthroplasty using a tapered titanium femoral component inserted without cement in patients with type C bone.  J Arthroplasty. 2003;  18 116-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Robinson R P, Lovell T P, Green T M. Hip arthroplasty using the cementless CLS stem. A 2 - 4-year experience.  J Arthroplasty. 1994;  9 177-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Romagnoli S. Press-fit hip arthroplasty: a European alternative.  J Arthroplasty. 2002;  17 108-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Schramm M. et al . Total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented femoral component with taper design: outcome at 10-year follow-up.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;  120 407-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Siebold R. et al . Langzeitergebnisse mit dem zementfreien Spotornoschaft.  Orthopäde. 2001;  30 317-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Singh S, Trikha S P, Edge A J. Hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stems in young patients. A prospective ten-year study.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2004;  86 1118-1123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Smith S E, Estok 2nd D M. 20-year experience with cemented primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty using so-called second-generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger.  J Arthroplasty. 2000;  15 263-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Spotorno L. et al . The CLS system. Theoretical concept and results.  Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;  59 144-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Spotorno L. et al . Persönliche Ergebnisse mit zementfreien Prothesen.  Orthopäde. 1987;  16 225-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Sutherland C J. et al . A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip-replacement arthroplasties.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1982;  64 970-982
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Teloken M A. et al . Ten to fifteen-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty with a tapered cobalt-chromium femoral component (tri-lock) inserted without cement.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 2002;  84-A 2140-2144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Willert H G, Bertram H, Buchhorn G H. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of bone cement fragmentation.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;  258 108-121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Willert H G, Bertram H, Buchhorn G H. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;  258 95-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Williams H D. et al . The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2002;  84 324-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Zweymuller K. A cementless titanium hip endoprosthesis system based on press-fit fixation: basic research and clinical results.  Instr Course Lect. 1986;  35 203-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. Peter R. Aldinger

Stiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik

Schlierbacher Landstraße 200 a

69118 Heidelberg

Telefon: 06221/968870

Fax: 06221/966347

eMail: peter.aldinger@ok.uni-heidelberg.de