Semin Thromb Hemost 2005; 31(5): 495-500
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-922219
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Hemophilia Treatment in Developing Countries: Products and Protocols

Alok Srivastava1 , Steve K. You2 , Yasmin Ayob3 , Ampaiwan Chuansumrit4 , Norma de Bosch5 , Raul Perez Bianco6 , Fereydoun Ala7
  • 1Professor, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
  • 2Korean Hemophilia Foundation, Seoul, Korea
  • 3National Blood Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 4Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 5Centro Nacional de Hemofilia, Caracas, Venezuela
  • 6Hematological Research Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 7Iranian Hemophilia Society, Teheran, Iran
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 November 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT

The most important aspect of management of hemophilia is to provide adequate replacement of safe clotting factor concentrates to prevent or treat bleeding episodes. There has been considerable progress in many countries in the developing world with regard to this aspect of care. However, very little data are available in the literature on the types of products being used for factor replacement and the doses being administered for control or treatment of bleeding in different countries. These data are important to document because only then can data from different centers be compared. This article provides data from seven countries: Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Venezuela, Argentina, Iran, and India. It shows that there is wide variability not only in the types of products used (plasma to recombinant factor concentrates) but also in the doses administered (minimal to very high) for similar indications. Prospective documentation of data on musculoskeletal outcome at these centers and correlation with dose of factor replacement could help identify different models of care. Comparing such data and collating the experience in different countries could be useful for optimizing care and establishing cost-effective models. The combined experience in the developing world in providing hemophilia services should be used to define standards of care that are practical and to set achievable goals.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Berntorp E, Boulyjenkov V, Brettler D et al.. Modern treatment of haemophilia.  Bull World Health Organ. 1995;  73 691-701
  • 2 Mannucci P M, Teitel J M, Gringeri A et al.. Haemophilia treatement protocols around the world: towards a consensus.  Haemophilia. 1998;  4 421-430
  • 3 Srivastava A, Chuansumrit A, Chandy M, Duraiswamy G, Karabus C. Management of haemophilia in the developing world.  Haemophilia. 1998;  4 474-480
  • 4 Chuansumrit A, Pakakasama S, Kuhathong K, Chantanakajornfung A, Hathirat P. Immune tolerance in a haemophilia A patient with high inhibitor using locally prepared lyophilized cryoprecipitate.  Haemophilia. 2000;  6 523-525
  • 5 Evatt B, Austin H, León G, Ruiz-Sáez A, de Bosch N. Haemophilia therapy assessing the cumulative risk of HIV exposure by cryoprecipitate.  Haemophilia. 1999;  5 295-300
  • 6 Srivastava A, Chandy M, Sunderaj G D et al.. Low-dose intermittent factor replacement for post-operative haemostasis in haemophilia.  Haemophilia. 1998;  4 799-801
  • 7 Srivastava A. Dose and response in haemophilia: Optimization of factor replacement therapy.  Br J Haematol. 2004;  127 12-25
  • 8 Srivastava A. Factor replacement therapy in haemophilia-are there models for developing countries?.  Haemophilia. 2003;  9 391-396
  • 9 Ljung R C. Prophylactic treatment in Sweden-overtreatment or optimal model?.  Haemophilia. 1998;  4 409-412

Alok SrivastavaM.D. 

Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore-632004, India

Email: aloks@cmcvellore.ac.in