RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-922862
Use of Three-Dimensional Computerized Tomography Reconstruction in Complex Facial Trauma
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
23. November 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT
Technological advances in computerized tomography (CT) have reduced data acquisition and reconstruction times so that three-dimensional (3D) CT images of maxillofacial injuries may be economically and quickly generated. 3DCT was judged superior to multiplanar two-dimensional CT in demonstrating the spatial relationships of fracture fragments in complex mandibular and midfacial trauma. Although 3DCT failed to demonstrate soft-tissue injuries well, the surgeon's improved appreciation of the disrupted bony architecture facilitated preoperative planning. 3DCT facilitates the evaluation of complex mandibular and midfacial fractures.
KEYWORDS
Computed tomography - facial fracture - facial trauma - mandible fracture
REFERENCES
- 1 Marentette L J, Maisel R H. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction in midfacial surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988; 98 48-52
- 2 Broumand S R, Labs J D, Novelline R A, Markowitz B L, Yaremchuk M J. The role of three-dimensional computed tomography in the evaluation of acute craniofacial trauma. Ann Plast Surg. 1993; 31 488-494
- 3 Reuben A D, Watt-Smith S R, Dobson D, Golding S J. A comparative study of evaluation of radiographs, CT and 3D reformatted CT in facial trauma: what is the role of 3D?. Br J Radiol. 2005; 78 198-201
- 4 Linnau K F, Stanley R B, Hallam D K, Gross J A, Mann F A. Imaging of high-energy midfacial trauma: what the surgeon needs to know. Eur J Radiol. 2003; 48 17-32
- 5 Dos Santos D T, Costa e Silva A P, Vannier M W, Cavalcanti M G. Validity of multislice computerized tomography for diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures using an independent workstation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98 715-720
- 6 Alder M E, Deahl S T, Matteson S R. Clinical usefulness of two-dimensional reformatted and three-dimensionally rendered computerized tomographic images: literature review and a survey of surgeons’ opinions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 53 375-386
- 7 Klenk G, Kovacs A. Do we need three-dimensional computed tomography in maxillofacial surgery?. J Craniofac Surg. 2004; 15 842-850
- 8 Fox L A, Vannier M W, West O C, Wilson A J, Baran G A, Pilgram T K. Diagnostic performance of CT, MPR and 3DCT imaging in maxillofacial trauma. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1995; 19 385-395
- 9 Mayer J S, Wainwright D J, Yeakley J W, Lee K F, Harris J H, Kulkarni M. The role of three-dimensional computed tomography in the management of maxillofacial trauma. J Trauma. 1988; 28 1043-1053
- 10 Hessel A, Roebuck J C, Perierea K D, Poole M D. 3D computed tomography reconstruction alter management decisions of facial fractures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131 243
Edmund A PribitkinM.D.
Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, Sixth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107