Intra-cyclic Distance per Stroke Phase, Velocity Fluctuations and Acceleration Time Ratio of a Breaststroker's Hip: A Comparison between Elite and Nonelite Swimmers at Different Race Paces

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the intra-cyclic velocity graphs of breaststroke swimmers at two skill levels in relation to their movement phases. Two groups of nine male swimmers were videotaped underwater at three swimming race paces corresponding to their actual competitive times for the 200-m, 100-m and 50-m breaststroke. Their forward intra-cyclic hip velocity was recorded with a velocity-meter. The breaststroke cycle was divided into four phases: leg propulsion, leg-arm lag phase, arm propulsion, and arm and leg recovery. From the velocity-time data, the following parameters were computed: an index of velocity fluctuations (IVF), the distance covered during each stroke phase, and an acceleration-deceleration time ratio (ADTR). The main results showed that in both groups of swimmers, when the race pace increased, the distance covered during the leg-arm lag phase decreased, while the other swimming phases remained stable. When expressed in relative values, the percentage of distance covered during the leg-arm lag phase decreased. In nonelite swimmers, the percentage of distance covered in the other stroke phases increased significantly, while only a tendency was noted in the elite group. Elite swimmers demonstrated a higher ADTR at the 50-m pace than at their 100-m and 200-m paces. An inter-group comparison showed that elite swimmers had higher values for the IVF and ADTR, which indicated their capacity to accelerate to boost the swim and highlighted the relevancy of these factors to discriminate skill level.

Intra-cyclic velocity - velocity-meter - breaststroke

References

• 1 Barbosa T, Santos-Vila J V, Sousa F, Vilas-Boas J P. Comparative study of the response of kinematical variables from the hip and centre of mass in butterfliers. Chatard JC Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of St Etienne 2003: 93-98
• 2 Chollet D, Seifert L, Leblanc H, Boulesteix L, Carter M. Evaluation of arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke.  Int J Sports Med. 2004;  25 486-495
• 3 Chollet D, Tourny-Chollet C, Gleizes F. Evolution of coordination in flat breaststroke in relation to velocity. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 29-32
• 4 Colman V, Persyn U, Daly D, Stijnen V. A comparison of the intra-cyclic velocity variation in breaststroke swimmers with flat and undulating styles.  J Sports Sci. 1998;  16 653-665
• 5 Costill D L, Lee G, D'Acquisto L J. Video-Computer assisted analysis of swimming technique.  J Swim Res. 1987;  3 5-9
• 6 Craig A B, Boomer W L, Skehan P L. Patterns of velocity in competitive breaststroke swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 73-77
• 7 D'Acquisto L J, Costill D L, Gehlsen G M, Young W T, Lee G. Breaststroke economy, skill, and performance: study of breaststroke mechanics using a computer based “velocity-video” system.  J Swim Res. 1988;  4 9-13
• 8 D'Acquisto L J, Costill D L. Relationship between intra-cyclic linear body velocity fluctuations, power, and sprint breaststroke performance.  J Swim Res. 1998;  13 8-14
• 9 Fujishima M, Miyashiata M. Velocity degradation caused by its fluctuations in swimming and guidelines for improvement of average velocity. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 41-45
• 10 Kent M R, Atha J. Intracycle kinematics and body configuration changes in the breaststroke. Clarys JP, Lewillie L Swimming Science II. Baltimore; University Park Press 1975: 125-129
• 11 Kolmogorov S V, Rumyantseva O A, Gordon B J, Cappaert J. Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels.  J Appl Biom. 1997;  13 88-97
• 12 Kornecki S, Bober T. Extreme velocities of swimming cycle as a technique criterion. Eriksson B, Furberg B In Swimming Medicine IV. Baltimore; University Park Press 1978: 402-407
• 13 Leblanc H, Seifert L, Baudry L, Chollet D. Arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke: a comparative study between elite and nonelite swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 787-797
• 14 Mc Elroy K, Blanksby B. Intra-cycle velocity fluctuations of highly skilled breaststroke swimmers. Physical education and recreation.  Austr J Health. 1976;  71 25-34
• 15 Magel J R. Propelling force measured during tethered swimming in the four competitive swimming styles.  Res Quarterly. 1970;  41 68-74
• 16 Maglischo C W, Maglischo E W, Santos T R. The relationship between the forward velocity of the centre of gravity and the hip in the four competitive strokes.  J Swim Res. 1987;  3 11-17
• 17 Manley P K, Atha J. Intra-stroke velocity fluctuations in paced breaststroke swimming. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London; E and FN Spon 1992: 151-159
• 18 Persyn U JJ, Colman V, van Tilborgh L. Movement analysis of the flat and undulating breaststroke pattern. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London; E and FN Spon 1992: 75-80
• 19 Reischle K. Objectives of and requirements for technique diagnosis in swimming. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 147-152
• 20 Sanders R H. Breaststroke technique variations among New Zealand pan pacific squad swimmers. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappeart JN, Trappe TA Biomech Med Swim Sci VII. London; E & FN Spon 1996: 64-69
• 21 Seifert L, Chollet D. A new index of flat breaststroke propulsion: comparison between elite men and women.  J Sports Sci. 2005;  23 309-320
• 22 Silva A, Colman V, Alves F, Soons B, Persyn U. Performance relevant time-space variables in breaststroke: sex differenciation. Chatard JC Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of St Etienne 2003: 179-183
• 23 Soares P M, Sousa F, Vilas-Boas J P. Differences in breaststroke synchronisation induced by different race velocities. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 53-57
• 24 Takagi H, Sugimoto S, Nishijima N, Wilson B. Differences in stroke phases, arm-leg coordination and velocity fluctuation due to event, gender and performance level in breaststroke.  Sports Biom. 2004;  3 15-27
• 25 Thompson K G, Haljand R, McLaren D P. An analysis of selected kinematic variables in national and elite male and female 100 m and 200 m breaststroke swimmers.  J Sports Sci. 2000;  18 421-431
• 26 Tourny C, Chollet D, Micallef J P, Macabies J. Comparative analysis of studies of speed variations within a breaststroke cycle. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London; E and FN Spon 1992: 161-166
• 27 Ungerechts B E, Buckwitz R, Bähr H. Principles of non-stationary swimming - A preliminary attempt. Chatard JC Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Science IX. Saint Etienne, France; University of St Etienne 2003: 45-49
• 28 van Tilborgh L M, Stijnen U V, Persyn U J. Using velocity fluctuations for estimating resistance and propulsion forces in breaststroke swimming. Johnson B Biomechanics XB. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics Publishers 1987: 779-784
• 29 Vilas-Boas J P. Speed fluctuations and energy cost of different breaststroke techniques. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strasse D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Science VII. London; E and FN Spon 1996: 167-171
• 30 Wakayoshi K, Nomura T, Takahashi G, Mutoh Y, Miyashita M. Analysis of swimming races in the 1989 Pan Pacific swimming competitions and 1988 Japanese Olympic Trials. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London; E and FN Spon 1992: 135-141